Latest syllabus of S90.03A is provided by killexams.com

killexams.com helps big numbers of check takers to obtain high marks within their exams plus achieve their professional goals. Simply signing up and downloading material will make a person sure you may pass your SOA Design & Architecture along with high marks. S90.03A Exam dumps are usually updated on a normal basis and down load is ready within your account, constantly.

S90.03A SOA Design & Architecture resources | http://babelouedstory.com/

S90.03A resources - SOA Design & Architecture Updated: 2024

Guarantee your prosperity with this S90.03A dumps questions
Exam Code: S90.03A SOA Design & Architecture resources January 2024 by Killexams.com team

S90.03A SOA Design & Architecture

Exam: S90.03A SOA Design & Architecture

Exam Details:
- Number of Questions: The exam consists of approximately 40 multiple-choice questions.
- Time: Candidates are given 60 minutes to complete the exam.

Course Outline:
The S90.03A SOA Design & Architecture exam focuses on assessing professionals' knowledge and skills in designing and architecting Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) solutions. The course covers the following topics:

1. Service-Oriented Analysis
- Service identification and modeling techniques
- Domain-driven design principles
- Service granularity and composition
- Service contract design and management

2. SOA Design Patterns
- Design patterns for service-oriented solutions
- Patterns for service composition and orchestration
- Integration patterns for service-oriented systems
- Patterns for service security and reliability

3. Service-Oriented Architecture Implementation
- SOA infrastructure components and technologies
- Service deployment and runtime environments
- SOA governance and management
- Service versioning and lifecycle management

4. Service-Oriented Solution Assessment and Validation
- Quality assurance techniques for SOA
- Performance testing and optimization
- Security testing and vulnerability assessment
- Solution validation and compliance

Exam Objectives:
The exam aims to assess candidates' understanding and proficiency in the following areas:

1. Service-oriented analysis and modeling techniques
2. Knowledge of SOA design patterns and best practices
3. Understanding of SOA implementation and infrastructure components
4. Ability to assess and validate SOA solutions for quality and compliance

Exam Syllabus:
The exam syllabus covers the following topics:

- Service-Oriented Analysis
- Service identification and modeling techniques
- Domain-driven design principles
- Service granularity and composition
- Service contract design and management

- SOA Design Patterns
- Design patterns for service-oriented solutions
- Patterns for service composition and orchestration
- Integration patterns for service-oriented systems
- Patterns for service security and reliability

- Service-Oriented Architecture Implementation
- SOA infrastructure components and technologies
- Service deployment and runtime environments
- SOA governance and management
- Service versioning and lifecycle management

- Service-Oriented Solution Assessment and Validation
- Quality assurance techniques for SOA
- Performance testing and optimization
- Security testing and vulnerability assessment
- Solution validation and compliance
SOA Design & Architecture
SOA Architecture resources

Other SOA exams

S90.01A Fundamental SOA & Service-Oriented Computing
S90.02A SOA Technology Concepts
S90.03A SOA Design & Architecture
S90.04A SOA Project Delivery & Methodology
S90.05A SOA Technology Lab
S90.08A Advanced SOA Design & Architecture
S90.09A SOA Design & Architecture Lab
S90.18A Fundamental SOA Security
S90.19A Advanced SOA Security
S90.20A SOA Security Lab
C90-06A Cloud Architecture Lab

Doing lot of struggle on S90.03A text books and instructor lead trainings is good stuff but real S90.03A exam is tricky. Our S90.03A dumps that consists of real exam mock test with vce exam simulator for practice. Once you go through our S90.03A dumps questions and practice with our vce exam simulator, makes you confident to pass the real S90.03A exam at first attempt.
SOA
S90.03A
SOA Design & Architecture
https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/S90.03A
Question: 90
The service-orientation principle primarily concerned with ensuring the runtime behavioral
predictability of a service is: Select the correct answer.
A. Service Prediction
B. Service Loose Coupling
C. Service Abstraction
D. None of the above.
Answer: D
Question: 91
The _______________ principle encourages services within the boundary of a specific service
inventory to share messages based on the same data models. This practice directly supports the
_____________ principle, which is concerned with designing services so that they can be
effectively and repeatedly aggregated into different solutions. Select the correct answer.
A. Service Abstraction, Service Autonomy
B. Service Autonomy, Service Composability
C. Standardized Service Contract, Service Composability
D. None of the above.
Answer: C
Question: 92
Which of the following characteristics directly supports or enables behavioral predictability
within services? Select the correct answer.
A. availability (service downtime and periods of unavailability are minimized)
B. maintainability (the service is easily evolved over time without disrupting existing
relationships with service consumers)
C. reliability (the service provides consistent results and performance)
D. All of the above.
Answer: D
31
http://www.ipass4sure.com
Question: 93
A service is sometimes referred to as an enterprise resource because: Select the correct
answer.
A. It establishes itself as a resource that is of use to more than one part of the enterprise.
B. It can only be defined by enterprise architects.
C. It always depends on the availability of enterprise legacy systems.
D. None of the above.
Answer: A
Question: 94
The Service Loose Coupling principle advocates which of the following coupling types?
Select the correct answer.
A. Contract-to-Implementation
B. Consumer-to-Contract
C. Logic-to-Contract
D. None of the above.
Answer: C
Question: 95
Which of the following statements correctly explains the difference between the Service
Reusability and Service Composability principles? Select the correct answer.
A. Service Reusability is focused on creating generic, reusable service logic, whereas Service
Composability is focused on creating services that are effective participants of multiple service
compositions.
B. Service Reusability is focused on creating non-agnostic service logic, whereas Service
Composability is focused on creating agnostic service logic.
C. Service Reusability is focused on creating highly scalable services, whereas Service
Composability is focused on creating highly isolated services.
D. There is no difference between these two principles. One principle name is used instead of
the other depending on whether you are building a task or entity service.
Answer: A
32
http://www.ipass4sure.com
Question: 96
Which of the following statements is true? Select the correct answer.
A. A composition initiator must exist as a service.
B. A composition initiator can be any type of program capable of invoking a service and
therefore does not need to be service-oriented.
C. A composition initiator is often associated with the intermediary role.
D. None of the above statements are true.
Answer: B
Question: 97
The Service Statelessness principle aims to establish a mechanism for the runtime deferral of
state data in order to minimize a _____________ condition when the service is
_____________. Select the correct answer.
A. stateful, passive
B. stateless, passive
C. stateful, active
D. stateless, active
Answer: C
Question: 98
Which of the following statements are true? SELECT ALL THAT APPLY
A. The application of service-orientation leads to reduced awareness of underlying service
implementation details because the Service Abstraction principle advocates limiting what is
published about services.
B. The application of service-orientation leads to increased consistency in how functionality is
expressed in the service contract because the Service Reusability principle advocates deferring
service contract information at runtime.
C. The application of service-orientation leads to increased behavioral predictability and
increased availability and scalability as a result of applying the Service Autonomy and Service
Statelessness design principles.
33
http://www.ipass4sure.com
D. The application of service-orientation leads to increased awareness of available services
because the Service Discoverability design principle advocates improving the communications
quality of published service information.
Answer: A, C, D
Question: 99
Which of the following is not an influence of service-orientation? Select the correct answer.
A. Object-Oriented Analysis and Design (OOAD)
B. Business Process Management (BPM)
C. Enterprise Application Integration (EAI)
D. Fluid Dynamics (FD)
Answer: D
Question: 100
Which of the following statements is true? Select the correct answer.
A. A composition member is a service that is not composed by other services.
B. A composition member is a service that is composed by another service.
C. A composition member is the same as a sub-controller.
D. None of the above statements are true.
Answer: B
34
http://www.ipass4sure.com
For More exams visit http://killexams.com

SOA Architecture resources - BingNews https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/S90.03A Search results SOA Architecture resources - BingNews https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/S90.03A https://killexams.com/exam_list/SOA Service-oriented architecture (SOA)

Cellebrite sees silver lining in the NetSuite cloud

It’s only natural that companies invest in business software solutions to bring about growth in their organisation. But in times of uncertainty, the narrative is around doing more with less, how to increase productivity and efficiency through automation, and how to get better control of supply chains. We see how one company is doing just that Continue Reading

Fri, 21 Aug 2020 05:19:00 -0500 en text/html https://www.computerweekly.com/resources/Service-oriented-architecture-SOA
Progress Software Rolls Out SOA Program

The OpenEdge division of Progress Software on Monday rolled out a program to help VARs accelerate the ability to enhance their business applications with a series of products, services and best practices through a systems-oriented architecture (SOA) enablement process.

The Accelerator Program allows new application partners to subscribe to a customized program that helps them rearchitect their applications and go-to-market with Open-Edge-based applications. The new program is based on the company's Application Transformation Approach (ATA).

"With these programs, we can offer partners more of a common-sense approach to adopting newer technologies or rearchitecting existing ones without being disruptive to their business. We can provide the business resources and the technology to deliver adaptive SOA-enabled applications," says Julie Christiansen, director of partner development and marketing for the Progress OpenEdge Division.

The program has several offerings, including the Learning Accelerator, which company officials describe as a first step toward becoming a Progress partner. The program offers new solution providers specific information on how Open Edge products can support their application.

Another offering is the Development Accelerator, which supports new solution providers with technical and business resources they need to migrate their application over to the OpenEdge platform. A third offering is the Market Accelerator, which gives solution providers who have already rearchitected their application help in shaping a go-to-market strategy, company officials says.

ATA is based on the OpenEdge Reference Architecture--essentially a blueprint and best practices for designing applications built to exploit an SOA. ATA supplies a phased methodology with assessment, analysis and modeling, along with redesign and the reuse of existing components. The architecture also helps with the building and testing of pilot modules so partners can extract all they can from their existing technology.

Sun, 10 Dec 2023 22:35:00 -0600 text/html https://www.crn.com/news/applications-os/171200751/progress-software-rolls-out-soa-program
HP, SAP Expand Their SOA Bond

HP's new SAP program follows the latter company's service-oriented architecture blueprint for improving workflow, automating business processes, and distributing information throughout an organization. The components supported by HP include SAP NetWeaver Portal, Exchange Infrastructure, and Business Intelligence.

The SAP-based services include HP's tools and applications for SOA quality testing, governance, security, and management. The latest offerings are part of HP's full life cycle of SAP services, which stretch from strategy and design through implementation, integration, and management.

HP's SOA service partners include chipmaker Intel and IDS Scheer, a specialist in business process management.

Sun, 10 Dec 2023 22:35:00 -0600 text/html https://www.crn.com/news/applications-os/197001483/hp-sap-expand-their-soa-bond
Griffin 2.0: Instacart Revamps Its Machine Learning Platform

Instacart created the next-generation platform based on experiences using the original Griffin machine-learning platform. The company wanted to Improve user experience and help manage all ML workloads. The revamped platform leverages the latest developments in MLOps and introduces new capabilities for current and future applications.

Instacart introduced its original Griffin platform in 2022 to support its journey toward leveraging machine learning for product development. Using a unified platform helped triple the number of ML applications in a year as it provided some key capabilities, including containerized environments, workflow management, feature marketplace, and real-time inference. Despite all the benefits, the first incarnation of the ML platform proved to be cumbersome to use by machine learning engineers (MLEs) due to relatively complex tooling, fragmented user experience, lack of standardization and metadata management, and insufficient scalability.

The company wanted to address the deficiencies identified in the first-generation platform and focus on providing a unified and scalable platform with a great user experience that would offer new and emerging capabilities such as distributed training and fine-tuning of Large Language Models (LLMs).

Griffin 1.0 Architecture Overview (Source: Instacart Technology Blog)

The second version of the Griffin platform replaced CLI and Git-based tooling with a service-oriented service-oriented architecture exposing REST APIs. These APIs are used by the web UI to provide a seamless experience to ML engineers, and Griffin SDK, which enables integrating other tools with Griffin, for instance, BentoLM, Instacart’s in-house ML notebook cloud-based development environment.

The platform backend comprises three major subsystems. The model training platform (MLTP) leverages Ray to offer a horizontally scalable computing environment that supports the distributed training of ML models. MLTP unifies various training backend platforms on Kubernetes and provides configuration-based runtimes for Tensorflow and LightGBM.

The model service platform (MLSP) provides streamlined and automated model artifact storage, model deployments, and provisioning of inference services. MLSP allows fine-tuning service resources and scalability configurations, which results in a quick and low-maintenance approach toward making ML models available for usage at scale.

The feature store supports feature computation, ingestion, discoverability, and shareability. With the new UI-based workflow, the users can configure new feature sources and fine-tune feature computation. Feature data validation helps catch errors much earlier, and storage optimization provides low-latency access to features.

Griffin 2.0 Architecture Overview (Source: Instacart Technology Blog)

All platform capabilities are available to ML engineers in a unified web UI application where they can create ML services end-to-end. At the same time, the process is guided by built-in validation at different stages to help rectify errors earlier in the process.

Rajpal Paryani, engineering manager at Instacart, summarizes the company’s journey in building and operating ML platforms:

Since our early days, we’ve witnessed rapid advancements in MLOps. The emergence of technologies like ChatGPT has revolutionized the utilization of Large Language Models (LLMs) across various industries. Our company is at the forefront of these developments. The guiding principles behind Griffin 2.0 [...] ensure that our ML infrastructure is well-prepared for advanced applications like LLM training, fine-tuning, and serving in the future.

Sun, 31 Dec 2023 18:21:00 -0600 en text/html https://www.infoq.com/news/2024/01/instacart-machine-learning/
Service Oriented

Joe McKendrick is an author and independent analyst who tracks the impact of information technology on management and markets. As an independent analyst, he has authored numerous research reports in partnership with Forbes Insights, IDC, and Unisphere Research, a division of Information Today, Inc. Joe speaks frequently on cloud, data, and enterprise computing courses at industry events and Webcasts. He is co-author, along with 16 leading industry leaders and thinkers, of the SOA Manifesto, which outlines the values and guiding principles of service orientation. In a previous life, Joe served as director of the Administrative Management Society (AMS), an international professional association dedicated to advancing knowledge within the IT and business management fields. He is a graduate of Temple University.

Wed, 13 Dec 2023 10:01:00 -0600 en text/html https://www.zdnet.com/blog/service-oriented/
Top 120 Hotel Architecture Firms for 2023

Top 120 Hotel Architecture Firms for 2023

Giants 400

Gensler, WATG, HKS, DLR Group, and HBG Design top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest hotel and resort architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.


By BD+C Staff | January 2, 2024

Top 120 Hotel Architecture Firms for 2023 - Image by bikson walder from Pixabay
Image by bikson walder from Pixabay

Gensler, WATG, HKS, DLR Group, and HBG Design top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest hotel and resort architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Top 120 Hotel Architecture Firms for 2023
  FIRM 2022 REVENUE
1 Gensler $79,064,883
2 WATG $77,924,699
3 HKS $72,000,000
4 DLR Group $24,440,000
5 HBG Design $20,074,000
6 Cooper Carry $19,400,953
7 Perkins Eastman $17,596,156
8 Baskervill $14,381,252
9 Arcadis North America $14,193,249
10 Stantec $14,152,080
11 JCJ Architecture $12,039,538
12 Solomon Cordwell Buenz (SCB) $11,891,646
13 G70 $11,535,128
14 Perkins&Will $10,311,923
15 Smallwood $8,257,494
16 RATIO Design $7,535,753
17 GSB $7,230,000
18 Skidmore, Owings & Merrill $7,070,000
19 AO $6,903,000
20 KTGY $6,742,437
21 LEO A DALY $6,707,417
22 Nunzio Marc DeSantis Architects $6,450,000
23 AE7 $5,617,800
24 Kohn Pedersen Fox $5,226,972
25 Page Southerland Page $5,163,600
26 BASE4 $4,796,900
27 MWT Architecture $4,700,000
28 Premier $4,425,800
29 NORR $4,226,719
30 Becker Morgan Group $4,162,115
31 Álvarez-Díaz & Villalón $3,770,220
32 Elkus Manfredi Architects $3,109,129
33 LK Architecture $3,100,000
34 TVS $3,086,330
35 Orcutt | Winslow $2,870,564
36 LS3P Associates $2,798,008
37 //3877 $2,735,000
38 HDR $2,700,000
39 Goettsch Partners $2,590,000
40 FSB Architects + Engineers $2,478,377
41 SmithGroup $2,443,340
42 WDG $2,375,000
43 BRP Architects $2,364,409
44 Nelson Worldwide $2,300,000
45 Niles Bolton Associates $2,278,395
46 MG2 $2,225,152
47 Urbahn Architects $2,100,000
48 PGAL $1,960,000
49 Think Architecture $1,925,974
50 McMillan Pazdan Smith $1,828,112
51 Luminaut $1,800,000
52 HOK $1,740,493
53 Quinn Evans $1,699,819
54 Hafer $1,634,508
55 Rule Joy Trammell Rubio $1,535,000
56 BAR Architects & Interiors $1,507,670
57 Cuningham $1,436,122
58 bKL Architecture $1,400,000
-- Kahler Slater $1,400,000
60 RSP Architects $1,349,000
61 RDC-S111, Inc. $1,268,085
62 AHL $1,203,524
63 GGLO $1,168,301
64 Cromwell Architects Engineers $1,129,468
65 NBJ Architecture $1,098,663
66 Bergmeyer $1,085,216
67 Architecture, Inc. $1,085,025
68 Ware Malcomb $1,060,114
69 Randall-Paulson Architects $1,056,080
70 Oculus $1,049,275
71 Moody Nolan $996,370
72 Mithun $907,831
73 Goodwyn Mills Cawood $846,219
74 Cushing Terrell $819,616
75 Handel Architects $745,981
76 HGA $730,386
77 CetraRuddy Architecture $638,819
78 RDG Planning & Design $615,310
79 CosciaMoos Architecture $572,348
80 Populous $572,015
81 TowerPinkster $535,813
82 GPD Group $535,000
83 CSO $482,154
84 LRK $480,000
85 EUA $480,000
86 45 Architecture $438,350
87 FK Architecture $410,000
88 TPG Architecture $372,000
89 Carrier Johnson + Culture $360,963
90 KGD Architecture $345,200
91 BSB Design $329,669
92 Dyer Brown & Associates $328,786
93 Kirksey Architecture $317,781
94 Nadel Architecture + Planning $311,194
95 MA Design $310,270
96 KG+D Architects $282,512
97 VLK Architects $245,300
98 Core States Group $215,369
99 Montroy DeMarco Architecture $210,000
100 H2M Architects + Engineers $190,308
101 INVISION Architecture $179,957
102 ATA Beilharz Architects $176,899
103 Interior Architects $136,957
104 MBH Architects $124,000
105 Tighe & Bond $121,492
106 NAC Architecture $106,900
107 NSPJ Architects $104,450
108 JLL $100,612
109 Elevatus Architecture $97,500
110 Legat Architects $86,000
111 Michael Baker Intl. $61,295
112 DAG Architects $53,331
113 Finegold Alexander Architects $51,338
114 Eckenhoff Saunders Architects $50,000
115 FitzGerald $48,000
116 ZGF $44,301
117 Schmidt Associates $25,000
118 Shepley Bulfinch $24,032
119 Weber Thompson $19,836
120 S3 Design $19,000
121 Bailey Edward Design $18,042
122 ThenDesign Architecture $17,185
123 SWBR $16,750
124 DLA+ Architecture & Interior Design $10,450
125 Aria Group Architects $10,333
126 Barge Design Solutions $10,162
127 BKV Group $10,100
128 Dahlin Architecture | Planning | Interiors $10,000
129 GFF $4,590
130 Gresham Smith $2,880

Source: 2023 Giants 400 Report

Giants 400 | Jan 3, 2024

Top 140 Reconstruction Contractors in 2023

STO Building Group, Turner Construction, HITT Contracting, Gilbane, and Whiting-Turner top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest building reconstruction/renovation general contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Jan 3, 2024

Top 70 Reconstruction Engineering Firms for 2023

Integrated Project Services, Alfa Tech, WSP, CRB Group, and McKinstry head BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest building reconstruction/renovation engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Jan 3, 2024

Top 200 Reconstruction Architecture Firms for 2023

Gensler, Stantec, HDR, Corgan, and PBK Architects top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest building reconstruction/renovation architecture and architecture engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Jan 2, 2024

Top 80 Hotel Construction Firms for 2023

Suffolk Construction, STO Building Group, PCL Construction Enterprises, AECOM, and Brasfield & Gorrie top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest hotel and resort general contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Jan 2, 2024

Top 70 Hotel Engineering Firms for 2023

Jacobs, EXP, IMEG, Tetra Tech, and Langan top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest hotel and resort engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Dec 20, 2023

Top 100 Apartment and Condominium Construction Firms for 2023

Clark Group, Suffolk Construction, Summit Contracting Group, and McShane Companies top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest apartment building and condominium general contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Dec 20, 2023

Top 70 Apartment and Condominium Engineering Firms for 2023

Kimley-Horn, WSP, Tetra Tech, and Thornton Tomasetti head BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest apartment building and condominium engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Dec 20, 2023

Top 160 Apartment and Condominium Architecture Firms for 2023

Gensler, Humphreys and Partners, Solomon Cordwell Buenz, and AO top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest apartment building and condominium architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.  

Giants 400 | Dec 20, 2023

Top 40 Student Housing Construction Firms for 2023

Findorff, Juneau Construction, JE Dunn Construction, and Weitz Company top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest student housing facility general contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Dec 20, 2023

Top 30 Student Housing Engineering Firms for 2023

Kimley-Horn, Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, KPFF Consulting Engineers, and Olsson head BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest student housing facility engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Top 140 Reconstruction Contractors in 2023

STO Building Group, Turner Construction, HITT Contracting, Gilbane, and Whiting-Turner top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest building reconstruction/renovation general contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report.


Top 70 Reconstruction Engineering Firms for 2023

Integrated Project Services, Alfa Tech, WSP, CRB Group, and McKinstry head BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest building reconstruction/renovation engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report.


Top 200 Reconstruction Architecture Firms for 2023

Gensler, Stantec, HDR, Corgan, and PBK Architects top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest building reconstruction/renovation architecture and architecture engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report.


Top 80 Hotel Construction Firms for 2023

Suffolk Construction, STO Building Group, PCL Construction Enterprises, AECOM, and Brasfield & Gorrie top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest hotel and resort general contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Tue, 02 Jan 2024 06:09:00 -0600 en text/html https://www.bdcnetwork.com/top-120-hotel-architecture-firms-2023
Top 200 Reconstruction Architecture Firms for 2023

Top 200 Reconstruction Architecture Firms for 2023

Giants 400

Gensler, Stantec, HDR, Corgan, and PBK Architects top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest building reconstruction/renovation architecture and architecture engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report.


By BD+C Staff | January 3, 2024

Top 200 Reconstruction Architecture Firms for 2023 photo Federal House at Penn State Behrend, Brad Feinknopf
Pictured: The oldest brick structure in Erie, Pa., once a link along the un­derground railroad, the Federal House at Penn State Behrend is gracefully preserved and repurposed by an expansive addition. The project provides a new offices, classrooms, and event space for the Susan Hirt Hagen Center for Community Outreach, Research, and Evaluation (CORE). On the team: Penn State Behrend (owner), GBBN (architect), WBCM (structural engineer), Tower Engineering (MEP engineer), evolveEA (sustainability consultant), Urban Engineers (civil engineer), EE Austin (contractor), Merritt Chase (landscape architect). Photo: Brad Feinknopf

Gensler, Stantec, HDR, Corgan, and PBK Architects top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest building reconstruction/renovation architecture and architecture engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Top 200 Reconstruction Architecture Firms for 2023
  FIRM 2022 REVENUE
1 Gensler $704,058,846
2 Stantec $331,956,574
3 HDR $224,276,500
4 Corgan $222,525,761
5 PBK Architects $165,356,199
6 CannonDesign $140,000,000
7 HOK $121,939,268
8 DLR Group $117,096,000
9 HKS $99,113,053
10 Nelson Worldwide $96,000,000
11 HGA $91,427,248
12 Interior Architects $85,786,711
13 Ware Malcomb $79,846,538
14 HED $78,039,000
15 DGA $62,151,142
16 ZGF $61,148,886
17 Flad Architects $59,800,000
18 Cushing Terrell $58,130,639
19 RSP Architects $57,477,000
20 HMC Architects $57,412,285
21 NORR $56,195,725
22 S/L/A/M Collaborative, The $53,152,673
23 Huckabee $49,525,681
24 Quinn Evans $47,707,544
25 SmithGroup $43,415,490
26 MBH Architects $43,185,000
27 EwingCole $42,982,646
28 EUA $42,173,000
29 E4H Environments for Health Architecture $42,096,807
30 Wold Architects and Engineers $41,420,700
31 LEO A DALY $40,271,258
32 WD Partners $37,030,000
33 Arcadis North America $36,415,946
34 LaBella Associates $35,681,815
35 Vocon $34,786,275
36 Ted Moudis Associates $34,000,000
37 Whitman, Requardt & Associates $33,787,876
38 H2M Architects + Engineers $30,859,971
39 Cooper Carry $30,133,327
40 Moseley Architects $29,172,838
41 Little Diversified Architectural Consulting $28,795,040
42 Baskervill $28,155,623
43 SMMA $27,898,455
44 RS&H $27,880,000
45 TreanorHL $27,582,310
46 LPA $27,445,146
47 NAC Architecture $26,270,660
48 Alliiance $26,153,687
49 BSA LifeStructures $25,862,534
50 SGA Design Group $25,848,750
51 Moody Nolan $25,420,973
52 Shepley Bulfinch $24,653,152
53 BWBR $24,552,980
54 Barge Design Solutions $24,312,858
55 GPD Group $23,707,000
56 HNTB $23,430,577
57 Hord Coplan Macht $23,169,832
58 TowerPinkster $22,315,452
59 VLK Architects $22,286,400
60 LS3P Associates $21,000,486
61 Skidmore, Owings & Merrill $20,941,000
62 FCArchitects $20,841,431
63 RATIO Design $19,484,584
64 CSArch $19,028,240
65 GBBN $18,870,000
66 Legat Architects $18,810,400
67 Champlin Architecture $18,341,136
68 Fanning Howey $18,311,630
69 Orcutt | Winslow $18,261,316
70 Elkus Manfredi Architects $17,738,765
71 Bergmeyer $17,352,820
72 Chipman Design Architecture $17,250,000
73 SWBR $17,032,073
74 Huntsman Architectural Group $16,941,351
75 FSB Architects + Engineers $16,812,771
76 Ballinger $16,788,763
77 Schmidt Associates $16,755,000
78 Ayers Saint Gross $15,752,500
79 WATG $15,272,996
80 JCJ Architecture $15,251,242
81 Lord Aeck Sargent Planning & Design $15,190,801
82 Clark & Enersen $14,726,714
83 MSA Design + MSA Sport $14,200,250
84 Hanbury $14,053,265
85 MS Consultants $13,890,647
86 Margulies Perruzzi $13,843,218
87 FXCollaborative $13,823,591
88 Taylor Design $13,766,280
89 Quattrocchi Kwok Architects $13,565,350
90 TETER $12,863,588
91 Grimm + Parker Architects $12,681,626
92 Hoefer Welker $12,600,000
93 RRMM Architects $12,433,705
94 AE Works $12,185,000
95 Carrier Johnson + Culture $12,060,737
96 Ashley McGraw Architects $11,994,829
97 CTA Architects $11,980,554
98 Stengel Hill Architecture $11,870,957
99 Fogarty Finger $11,770,000
100 Bray Architects $11,483,459
101 Solomon Cordwell Buenz (SCB) $11,373,013
102 STR Partners $11,026,301
103 Cromwell Architects Engineers $10,972,285
104 Bailey Edward Design $10,708,666
105 Kirksey Architecture $10,652,262
106 Architecture, Inc. $10,416,000
107 Cordogan Clark & Associates $10,390,012
108 DLA Architects $10,339,051
109 Ratcliff Architecture $10,300,000
110 CO Architects $10,225,255
111 BBS Architects, Landscape Architects & Engineers $10,213,838
112 Urbahn Architects $10,000,400
113 Guidon $9,796,423
114 Hendy $9,623,210
115 Kahler Slater $9,620,000
116 Parkhill $9,237,066
117 Dattner Architects $9,186,500
118 CetraRuddy Architecture $9,123,256
119 BCA Architects & Engineers $8,700,000
120 SHP $8,606,288
121 Sasaki $8,296,956
122 Massa Multimedia Architecture $7,923,872
123 Oculus $7,867,111
124 Payette $7,831,437
125 Blair + Mui Dowd Architects $7,689,001
126 Dyer Brown & Associates $7,614,869
127 Hollis + Miller Architects $7,350,351
128 GWWO Architects $7,226,708
129 FitzGerald $7,223,000
130 HuntonBrady Architects $6,834,561
131 Studio+ $6,770,168
132 Grace Hebert Curtis Architects $6,618,639
133 Montroy DeMarco Architecture $6,607,000
134 LRK $6,500,000
135 Luminaut $6,331,200
136 MG2 $6,303,366
137 BKV Group $6,300,000
138 RKTB Architects $6,201,389
139 CB Design Group $5,877,473
140 G70 $5,781,855
141 INVISION Architecture $5,650,413
142 Garmann Miller $5,579,076
143 Elevatus Architecture $5,500,000
144 HFG Architecture $5,470,182
145 May Architecture $5,364,017
146 Manning $5,156,431
147 //3877 $5,011,000
148 BLDD Architects $4,996,000
149 SchraderGroup Architecture $4,952,000
150 AHL $4,942,288
151 McKinley Architecture and Engineering $4,657,093
152 Curtis + Ginsberg Architects $4,524,880
153 DLA+ Architecture & Interior Design $4,286,838
154 REES $4,240,800
155 Miller Dunwiddie $4,223,540
156 CosciaMoos Architecture $4,159,112
157 HBG Design $4,100,000
158 Dahlin Architecture | Planning | Interiors $4,000,000
159 Method Architecture $3,923,975
160 AG Architecture $3,916,605
161 Anderson Mikos Architects $3,906,500
162 BAR Architects & Interiors $3,770,169
163 LMN Architects $3,613,000
164 RDG Planning & Design $3,576,489
165 MKM Architecture + Design $3,519,092
166 ThenDesign Architecture $3,483,546
167 HERA Laboratory Planners $3,392,481
168 RBB Architects $3,348,000
169 GMB Architecture + Engineering $3,326,895
170 Davis Brody Bond $3,225,134
171 AE7 $3,183,752
172 KSS Architects $3,047,522
173 Lantz-Boggio Architects $3,044,000
174 PF&A Design $3,014,476
175 IKM Architecture $3,000,000
176 Jeffrey Berman Architect $2,975,000
177 OSports $2,900,000
178 KG+D Architects $2,898,905
179 Hastings+Chivetta Architects $2,875,169
180 GFF $2,872,839
181 Finegold Alexander Architects $2,600,962
182 Thriven Design $2,576,042
183 Macgregor Associates Architects $2,519,713
184 WDG $2,499,000
185 Glenn|Partners $2,400,000
186 JRS Architect $2,350,000
187 Handel Architects $2,236,630
188 GRW $2,194,381
189 Mackey Mitchell Architects $2,155,987
190 Rossetti $2,085,382
191 TSK Architects $2,082,614
192 Tricarico Architecture and Design $2,051,100
193 Reztark Design Studio $1,946,011
194 Creative Design Solutions $1,884,000
195 Rule Joy Trammell Rubio $1,880,000
196 Nunzio Marc DeSantis Architects $1,800,000
197 Hill West Architects $1,724,200
198 Wilson Butler Architects $1,637,195
199 Randall-Paulson Architects $1,636,865
200 Cooper Robertson $1,612,695
201 Nextgen Architects $1,527,000
202 Mascari Warner Dinh Architects $1,417,370
203 SAS Architects & Planners $1,364,948
204 Roth Sheppard Architects $1,351,466
205 HMFH Architects $1,214,742
206 GGLO $1,208,506
207 ATA Beilharz Architects $1,201,010
208 Goettsch Partners $1,080,000
209 Lawson Group Architects $975,000
210 Álvarez-Díaz & Villalón $565,000
211 S3 Design $544,200
212 Scientia Architects $500,000
213 Robert Siegel Architects $497,837
214 NBJ Architecture $461,438
215 Weber Thompson $249,160
216 bKL Architecture $200,000
217 Greenberg Farrow $200,000
218 Dwell Design Studio $71,977

Source: 2023 Giants 400 Report 

Giants 400 | Jan 3, 2024

Top 140 Reconstruction Contractors in 2023

STO Building Group, Turner Construction, HITT Contracting, Gilbane, and Whiting-Turner top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest building reconstruction/renovation general contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Jan 3, 2024

Top 70 Reconstruction Engineering Firms for 2023

Integrated Project Services, Alfa Tech, WSP, CRB Group, and McKinstry head BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest building reconstruction/renovation engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Jan 2, 2024

Top 80 Hotel Construction Firms for 2023

Suffolk Construction, STO Building Group, PCL Construction Enterprises, AECOM, and Brasfield & Gorrie top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest hotel and resort general contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Jan 2, 2024

Top 70 Hotel Engineering Firms for 2023

Jacobs, EXP, IMEG, Tetra Tech, and Langan top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest hotel and resort engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Jan 2, 2024

Top 120 Hotel Architecture Firms for 2023

Gensler, WATG, HKS, DLR Group, and HBG Design top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest hotel and resort architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report. 

Giants 400 | Dec 20, 2023

Top 100 Apartment and Condominium Construction Firms for 2023

Clark Group, Suffolk Construction, Summit Contracting Group, and McShane Companies top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest apartment building and condominium general contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Dec 20, 2023

Top 70 Apartment and Condominium Engineering Firms for 2023

Kimley-Horn, WSP, Tetra Tech, and Thornton Tomasetti head BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest apartment building and condominium engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Dec 20, 2023

Top 160 Apartment and Condominium Architecture Firms for 2023

Gensler, Humphreys and Partners, Solomon Cordwell Buenz, and AO top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest apartment building and condominium architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.  

Giants 400 | Dec 20, 2023

Top 40 Student Housing Construction Firms for 2023

Findorff, Juneau Construction, JE Dunn Construction, and Weitz Company top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest student housing facility general contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Dec 20, 2023

Top 30 Student Housing Engineering Firms for 2023

Kimley-Horn, Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, KPFF Consulting Engineers, and Olsson head BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest student housing facility engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Top 140 Reconstruction Contractors in 2023

STO Building Group, Turner Construction, HITT Contracting, Gilbane, and Whiting-Turner top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest building reconstruction/renovation general contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report.


Top 70 Reconstruction Engineering Firms for 2023

Integrated Project Services, Alfa Tech, WSP, CRB Group, and McKinstry head BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest building reconstruction/renovation engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report.


Top 80 Hotel Construction Firms for 2023

Suffolk Construction, STO Building Group, PCL Construction Enterprises, AECOM, and Brasfield & Gorrie top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest hotel and resort general contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.


Top 70 Hotel Engineering Firms for 2023

Jacobs, EXP, IMEG, Tetra Tech, and Langan top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest hotel and resort engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Wed, 03 Jan 2024 04:03:00 -0600 en text/html https://www.bdcnetwork.com/top-200-reconstruction-architecture-firms-2023
New LEVC electric car architecture to bring major range expansion

The London Electric Vehicle Company says it “is transforming from a high-end taxi manufacturer to a leading provider of pure electric global mobility solutions”. The Geely-owned firm, which has roots in the century-old London Taxi Company, has detailed an all-new flexible electric platform called SOA, or Space Oriented Architecture, for this purpose. 

LEVC has already begun to expand operations beyond its core product, the TX hackney carriage, to the VN5 van which uses the same platform, itself used as the basis for a campervan concept which didn’t reach production. SOA will allow the company to offer a much more diverse range of vehicles.

Co-developed with Geely in China, the UK, Sweden and Germany over the last two and a half years, SOA is designed for larger vehicles from 4,860mm in length all the way up to 5,995mm, with wheelbases ranging from 3,000mm to 3,800mm. 73kWh, 102kWh and 120kWh battery packs can be fitted, giving a potential range figure of up to 432 miles. Multiple motor configurations are possible, too, meaning SOA-underpinned vehicles can be either front, rear or all-wheel drive. 

As implied by the first bit of the SOA acronym, interior space is a high priority for the SOA. A four-row configuration is possible, with a foldable fourth row plus the two middle benches mounted on 1.9-metre-long rails to provide flexible seating positions. Geely’s vehicle architecture boss Kent Bovellan has confirmed that while there are some shared parts between the company’s SEA (Sustainable Experience Architecture) platform - which is set to be used for the Polestar 4 - the two are largely unrelated. Interestingly, SOA isn’t to be used at other Geely-owned brands - LEVC managing director Chris Allen referred to it as "specific to LEVC's activities". 

The platform will be used for larger ‘F+’ class vehicles - think MPVs, big SUVs and commercial vehicles like pick-up trucks, although an image in LEVC’s presentation featured five sheet-covered cars all with similar, van-like silhouettes. The vehicles were named Leisure Space, Business Space, Utility Space, Delivery Space and are collectively referred to as the ‘Xspace family’. 

LEVC SOA platform 2

Inside there’s a completely flat floor adding to the utility of the space. Cleverly packaging various elements that might normally be at the front of the car - like the low-voltage battery, which is instead under the driver’s seat - also makes for a short front overhang. LEVC is claiming a ‘cabin space utilisation’ figure eight per cent better than competitors on average. 

For the chassis, there’s a MacPherson strut arrangement at the front with a double lower control arm and a multilink setup at the rear. Adaptive suspension with air springs will feature. 

LEVC is remaining tight-lipped about exactly what vehicles it intends to make using SOA, and when it’ll make them. Speaking during a roundtable interview at the platform reveal event, Chris Allen said the announcement was “about demonstrating a new foundation that is layering on top of our existing products to enable us to start moving into those sectors”. He added: “It's very much more today about the platform and giving us the freedom to start thinking towards new models rather than the specifics of what we going to do. That's the next exciting phase for us.”

Need to sell your car?

Find your best offer from over 5,000+ dealers. It’s that easy.

We’re similarly in the dark about where SOA-underpinned cars will be made. Allen did, at least, note that it would be possible to build them at LEVC’s existing facility in Coventry. As it stands, the factory has the capacity to produce up to 20,000 cars a year if extra shifts were added (currently around 3,000 vehicles - mostly TXs - are built there annually), a figure which could be expanded.

“The adaptability of this facility is one of its strengths,” Allen said, adding “We can grow the capacity, we can extend the footprint, and we've got complete modular approaches.”

He concluded: “The purpose of launching this platform today here in the UK, the home of the Black Cab, is very much to demonstrate that new capability coming into this business.”

Click here for our list of the best electric cars on sale right now...

Thu, 04 May 2023 11:09:00 -0500 en text/html https://www.autoexpress.co.uk/levc/360146/new-levc-electric-car-architecture-bring-major-range-expansion
New E-Resource: Bloomsbury Architecture Library

The Library has subscribed to Bloomsbury Architecture Library, available now via the Library Databases page.

is a leading digital resource for the study of architecture, urbanism, and interior design. Its dynamic digital platform offers access to wide-ranging collections of text and image content, from architectural history to cutting-edge design guidance. The platform is comprised of multiple collections:

The Core Collection
Explore 5,500 years of the world’s architecture through Sir Banister Fletcher’s Global History of Architecture 21st edition; browse through an interactive visual timeline of global architectural history; or undertake in-depth research through Bloomsbury’s library of architecture ebooks.
Architecture Design & Practice Online
In partnership with Taylor and Francis, the Architecture Design & Practice Online collection includes 200+ titles focusing on studio design, technical detail, and professional practice.

Full details of all our databases and e-resources can be found on the Library Databases page.

Tue, 29 Jun 2021 21:53:00 -0500 en-GB text/html https://www.ulster.ac.uk/library/updates/resources/new-e-resource-bloomsbury-architecture-library
natural resources: The Latest Architecture and News

Ailton Krenak is a renowned environmentalist, philosopher, writer, and poet who holds honorary doctorates from the Federal University of Minas Gerais and the Federal University of Juiz de Fora. As an Indigenous leader, he played a pivotal role in advocating for Indigenous Rights, which were eventually enshrined in the 1988 Constitution of Brazil. His profound ideas have been disseminated through lectures, educational courses, and books, including notable works such as Ideas to Postpone the End of the World, Life is not Useful, and Ancestral Future.

Krenak has a unique talent for transforming his life experiences into profound concepts, which he conveys through oral and poetic language. His worldview blurs the boundaries between landscapes, human beings, animals, rivers, and mountains. He strongly advocates for a reassessment of our lifestyle, emphasizing the importance of 'breaking up the ground to allow the channeled waters to resurface.' On September 5th, he participated in a discussion in São Paulo during the Archtrends Summit 2023, organized by Portobello. During this event, he shared his insights on courses such as cities, forests, and the future of our planet.

Sun, 12 Nov 2023 09:59:00 -0600 en-US text/html https://www.archdaily.com/tag/natural-resources




S90.03A reality | S90.03A information hunger | S90.03A guide | S90.03A history | S90.03A tricks | S90.03A techniques | S90.03A study help | S90.03A benefits | S90.03A guide | S90.03A book |


Killexams exam Simulator
Killexams Questions and Answers
Killexams Exams List
Search Exams
S90.03A exam dump and training guide direct download
Training Exams List