Money back guarantee of PEGAPCDC80V1 real questions at killexams.com

With all the assistance of the particularly tested killexams.com Pegasystems Pega Certified Decisioning Consultant real questions and study guide you may figure out just how to create your own PEGAPCDC80V1 knowledge. Our PEGAPCDC80V1 questions and answers are usually updated also to the purpose. The Pegasystems PEGAPCDC80V1 braindumps make your own vision tremendous plus help you extremely in planning associated with the PEGAPCDC80V1 exam.

Exam Code: PEGAPCDC80V1 Practice exam 2022 by Killexams.com team
PEGAPCDC80V1 Pega Certified Decisioning Consultant

Exam subjects (% of exam)
Next-Best-Action Concepts (8%)
Customer Decision Hub overview
Optimizing customer value in the contact center
Next-Best-Action Designer (15%)
Defining and managing propositions
Authoring Next-Best-Action decisions
Configuring Next-Best-Action designer for real-life scenarios
Decision Strategies (47%)
Using propositions in a decision strategy canvas
Calculating dynamic prices
Selecting the most profitable proposition
Selecting the target audience
Defining proposition eligibility rules
Learning from historical interactions
Using aggregated data to select the best offer
Designing decision strategies for real-life scenarios
Testing strategies en masse with simulations
Understanding decision strategy execution
Arbitrating between propositions
Evaluating customer credit score
Avoiding redundant product offerings
AI Powered 1-to-1 Customer Engagement (30%)
Predicting customer behavior
Using third party predictive models
Predicting customer behavior using real-time data
Utilizing text analytics to Strengthen business performance

Pega Certified Decisioning Consultant
Pegasystems Decisioning study
Killexams : Pegasystems Decisioning study - BingNews https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/PEGAPCDC80V1 Search results Killexams : Pegasystems Decisioning study - BingNews https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/PEGAPCDC80V1 https://killexams.com/exam_list/Pegasystems Killexams : Study the Permanent Things

“Study Everything, Do Anything,” read the motto of my alma mater, Notre Dame’s College of Arts and Letters. No phrase better encapsulates the state of contemporary liberal arts education on university and college campuses. The modern university offers nearly limitless academic paths, clubs by the carload, and amenities galore. Students are prompted to drink deeply of all the options—to study everything—during their four years on campus. But even as the modern university offers a multitude of majors and minors, the abundance of options and the absence of any real guidance leaves students adrift.

The hard truth is that the contemporary university no longer knows what it means to be educated. Where the university was once able to articulate the telos of its activities—the cultivation of the good life or the formation of gentlemen, for example—today it can offer little more than vacuous statements about shaping students to enact meaningful change or empowering them to be a force for good. Focused on producing all-star consultants and future lawyers, universities devote little attention to true education, which is less the accumulation of knowledge and more the art of pursuing truth and understanding the human condition. 

Pursued correctly, education relies upon community and relationship with others while enabling students to participate more fully in culture and society. Today, the university addresses not the student but the atomized will—a project that fails because its fundamental premise contradicts the genuine nature of education.

Despite their professed mission statements, modern universities operate on the terms of expressive individualism, which conceives of the person as defined by her individual psychological core. American sociologist Robert Bellah, who first coined the term, explained that expressive individualism understands the purpose of life to be the social expression of that inner core, through which a person “lives her truth” and manifests her authentic self to the world.

This cultural focus on individual authenticity and self-expression has flipped what it means to be educated on its head, detaching the pursuit of truth and knowledge from any notions of relationship, responsibility, or community. By the logic of expressive individualism, relationships and social structures are only good if they facilitate the self-definition of individual wills. Higher education, then, cannot be good if it constrains or represses that pursuit of self-expression.

By this logic, the choose-your-own-adventure model of education, in which a student has nearly complete freedom to choose from a wide array of electives, makes sense. Most colleges retain graduation requirements, but these merely ensure that a student has selected elective classes across a handful of disciplines. Any robust core requirements that subject a student to authors like Plato, Aristotle, and Augustine hinder the self-direction of education. Perhaps a student will choose to read a few of the classics, but perhaps she will take a class on 20th century French feminist film noir. No courses are better or more worthwhile than any others when expressive individualism turns education into a four-year passion project.

This relativism is unlikely to relinquish its hold on our institutions in the foreseeable future. But within the world of higher education, students can still seek out true intellectual formation. For now, at least, students can still get an education in college.

When I entered Notre Dame as a freshman, I was overwhelmed by the humanities offerings—35 majors, 17 supplementary majors, and 48 minors. The College of Arts and Letters offered little direction, encouraging me to “Study Everything!” (And worse, “Do Anything!”) As long as I pursued my passions and fulfilled a few cursory graduation requirements, I would walk across the stage four years later with my diploma. Mission accomplished!

Over several years, I realized the flaws inherent in the elite university’s prioritization of the atomized individual and the unfettered pursuit of one’s passions, but I wish I’d learned this lesson much sooner.

By a providential skepticism towards academic specialization, I started my freshman year with classes in the Program of Liberal Studies—Notre Dame’s only liberal arts major with a structured curriculum and no electives. practicing Homer’s epics, studying Greek tragedies, and making my first foray into Platonic dialogues completely changed my perspective on education.

It was intoxicating, practicing the books that have shaped Western civilization and realizing the immense freedom found in studying a canon instead of blindly following my personal interests. It took me a few years to understand how to structure my course schedule so that I would receive a real education, but under the influence of the great books and authors stricken from once-required core classes, I began to fill in the gaps in my education.

Freed from the myopia of expressive individualism, education can be understood holistically—not only as a project of intellectual development, but also as growth in the capacity for the good life. By setting aside bromides about pursuing my passions and studying everything, I found a lodestar by which to navigate the endless menu of electives offered each semester: the relationships and duties to which I must attend.

As an American with duties to my country and my fellow citizens, I sought out classes on our nation’s history, government, and underlying political theory. And as a Christian, I have duties to God and to my conscience. To ensure the education of the heart alongside the mind, I took classes in moral theology and the Catholic intellectual tradition.

As a daughter, a sister, and someday a mother, I also have duties to my family. And while I have no obligation to devote my life to the humanities, wouldn’t it have been a shame if I had altogether neglected the art, books, music, and ideas that we have inherited from previous generations? If I could not someday pass on to my children at least a smattering of the good and beautiful produced by our civilization?

Fri, 18 Nov 2022 23:30:00 -0600 en-US text/html https://www.theamericanconservative.com/study-the-permanent-things/
Killexams : Across time and space: Psychological distance and inventory decision making

In operations management, there's a well-known model called the newsvendor problem. Based on the classic scenario of a paper carrier deciding how many papers to try to sell each day, the newsvendor problem illustrates the challenge of determining supply in advance of knowing demand.

"The newsvendor problem serves as a workhorse of issues because it captures, in its simplest form, the challenge of balancing the cost of excess inventory with the cost of a shortage," said Brent Moritz, associate professor of supply chain management in the Penn State Smeal College of Business. "There's a cost of having too much—because the value of a day-old newspaper is zero—and a cost of not having enough—because you don't want to run out when you could have sold more."

Complicating inventory issues are that can affect how inventory managers perceive their suppliers. Moritz, along with co-author Samuel Kirshner, associate professor in the School of Information Systems and Technology Management at the University of New South Wales, Australia, recently published a paper in Production and Operations Management that examines how psychological distance factors affect order quantity decisions.

"Many businesses have to place orders for inventory ahead of knowing demand," explained Moritz, whose area of research is behavioral . "If a business knows the costs of either too much inventory or too little inventory and can estimate expected demand, it's possible to select an optimal order quantity. In our study, however, we found that individual decision makers are not especially good at doing this, even if they have all the information they need."

The researchers looked at two common measures of psychological distance—spatial distance (suppliers that are geographically near or far) and temporal distance (short or long lead time from order to receipt). Across four experiments with 663 participants acting as inventory managers, they found that a far psychological distance, both spatial and temporal, increases order quantities.

In general, this increase in order quantities leads to better outcomes for high-profit-margin settings and poorer outcomes for low-profit-margin settings. In the case of high-margin items—those with a high price markup—Moritz said, "You don't want to run out because every sale is profitable. In the electronics world, for example, it's not TVs where retailers make their money—rather, they make their money on TV accessories like cables and mounting brackets. If you're Best Buy, you don't want to run out of mounting brackets because they might sell for close to $100 but probably cost the retailer about $10. So you might over-order to make sure you have enough."

For low-margin items, those that sell for minimal profit, over-ordering is less profitable. Moritz posed another example: "Let's say you're going to sell Penn State T-shirts featuring Homecoming 2022," he said. "If you buy shirts at $10 each and then sell them for $12 each, you don't want to have too much left over because what happens when Homecoming weekend of 2022 is over? You're stuck with extra inventory."

The researchers found it especially interesting that psychological distance in both space and time influenced order quantity, even though those factors shouldn't matter. "It shouldn't influence the order quantity at all," Moritz said. "While an inventory manager might place an order earlier from a with a longer lead time, there's no reason to order more from that same supplier."

Adding another layer to the psychological distance phenomenon, the researchers applied construal level theory, which speaks to how someone construes or perceives distance. In one phase of the study, the researchers asked two groups to focus on a provider that is 100 miles away. For the first group, suppliers ranged from 10 to 100 miles away, and the participants were asked to focus on the provider that was 100 miles away. For the second group, suppliers ranged from 100 to 1,000 miles away, and subjects were again asked to focus on the provider 100 miles away.

"So in each case, participants made ordering decisions from a provider located 100 miles away, but with respect to the firm's other suppliers, 100 miles away was framed as being relatively close or relatively far," Moritz explained. The researchers found that when ordering low-profit-margin items, framing the provider as spatially close led to a significant decrease in orders, and for high-margin conditions, framing the provider as far away led to an increase in orders.

"Given that spatial and temporal distances occur naturally in supply chains, these results show us that psychological distance is one driver of decisions, and distance framing could be used to decrease biased inventory ordering," he said. "Applying theory from to show the intersection of human nature and supply chain and operations decisions, as we did in this study, can lead to improved performance in inventory ordering."

More information: Samuel N. Kirshner et al, For the future and from afar: Psychological distance and inventory decision‐making, Production and Operations Management (2022). DOI: 10.1111/poms.13829

Citation: Across time and space: Psychological distance and inventory decision making (2022, November 11) retrieved 9 December 2022 from https://phys.org/news/2022-11-space-psychological-distance-decision.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Fri, 11 Nov 2022 05:08:00 -0600 en text/html https://phys.org/news/2022-11-space-psychological-distance-decision.html
Killexams : Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Analysis Report 2023 Along with Statistics Figures, Forecasts till 2025

The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.

Dec 02, 2022 (The Expresswire) -- Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market 2022 Report [Report Pages-112) offers a Comprehensive assessment regarding the competitive landscape of the market and includes a deep description of performance by some of the key global players (Automation Anywhere (U.S.), Blue Prism (U.K.), Celaton Ltd (U.K.), Ipsoft (U.S.), Nice Systems Ltd. (Israel), Pegasystems (U.S.), Redwood Software (U.S.), Uipath (Romania), Verint (U.S.), Xerox Corporation (U.S.)) completing in the market. It offers an updates of business strategies including mergers, acquisitions, partnerships, R and D, product launch, expansion of production units, and collaborations adopted by these major global players.

What are the Key Industry Development in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market?

Robotic process automation is an application technology where software with capabilities of artificial intelligence and machine learning are used for handling high volume, repeatable tasks. RPA allows employees to configure and program a computer software or a robot to interpret exiting application in the organization for manipulating data, processing transactions and communicating with digital systems.

North America region accounts for largest share in robotic process automation market owing to high development in field of technology and presence of developed countries. Europe is one of the prominent player in the market of robotic process automation. Countries such as U.K., Germany and Italy are the major contributors in the market growth due to the rich manufacturing and automotive industry. Asia-Pacific is expected to emerge as fastest growing market during the forecast period. Development of Asian countries and demand for consumer electronic products is forcing the manufacturers to adopt a cost effective technology in the manufacturing process.

The Robotic Process Automation (RPA) market was valued at Million USD in 2018 and is projected to reach Million USD by 2025, at a CAGR of % during the forecast period. In this study, 2018 has been considered as the base year and 2019 to 2025 as the forecast period to estimate the market size for Robotic Process Automation (RPA).

This report presents the worldwide Robotic Process Automation (RPA) market size (value, production and consumption), splits the breakdown (data status 2014-2019 and forecast to 2025), by manufacturers, region, type and application.

This study also analyzes the market status, market share, growth rate, future trends, market drivers, opportunities and challenges, risks and entry barriers, sales channels, distributors and Porter's Five Forces Analysis.

Get a demo PDF of report -https://www.marketgrowthreports.com/enquiry/request-sample/14199376

Which are the prominent Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market players across the Globe?

● Along with this survey you also get their Product Information Types (Automated Solution, Decision Support And Management Solution, Interaction Solution), Applications (BFSI, Healthcare and Pharmaceuticals, Manufacturing and Logistics, IT and Telecommunication, Retail, Travel, Hospitality, Transportation, Others), and Specification. Detailed profiles of the Top major players in the industry:Automation Anywhere (U.S.), Blue Prism (U.K.), Celaton Ltd (U.K.), Ipsoft (U.S.), Nice Systems Ltd. (Israel), Pegasystems (U.S.), Redwood Software (U.S.), Uipath (Romania), Verint (U.S.), Xerox Corporation (U.S.)

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Effect Factor Analysis.

● Technology Process/Risk Considering Substitute Threat and Technology Progress InRobotic Process Automation (RPA) Industry. ● Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market research contains an in-depth analysis of report complete data on factors influencing demand, growth, opportunities, challenges, and restraints, and Analysis of Pre and Post COVID-19 Market.

What Overview Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Says?

● This Overview Includes Diligent Analysis of Scope, Types, Application, Sales by region, types and applications. ● Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market, USD Forecast till Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

What Is Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Competition

● considering Manufacturers, Types and Application? Based on Thorough Research of Key Factors

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Manufacturing Cost Analysis

● This Analysis is done by considering prime elements like Key RAW Materials, Price Trends, Market Concentration Rate of Raw Materials, Proportion of Raw Materials and Labour Cost in Manufacturing Cost Structure. ● Political/Economical Change. with unexpected CAGR during the forecast period. ● Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market size is expected to extent multi million by 2025, in comparison to 2022

To Know How Covid-19 Pandemic and Russia Ukraine War Will Impact This Market- REQUEST SAMPLE

What are Industry Insights?

The Global Robotic Process Automation (RPA) market is expected to rise at a considerable rate during the forecast period, between 2022 and Robotic Process Automation (RPA). In 2021, the market is rising at a steady rate and with the expanding adoption of strategies by key players, the market is expected to rise over the projected horizon.

What are the top key players in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market?

● Automation Anywhere (U.S.)
● Blue Prism (U.K.)
● Celaton Ltd (U.K.)
● Ipsoft (U.S.)
● Nice Systems Ltd. (Israel)
● Pegasystems (U.S.)
● Redwood Software (U.S.)
● Uipath (Romania)
● Verint (U.S.)
● Xerox Corporation (U.S.)

and more…

Get a demo PDF of report -https://www.marketgrowthreports.com/enquiry/request-sample/14199376

Key Stakeholders:

Raw material suppliersDistributors/traders/wholesalers/suppliersRegulatory bodies, including government agencies and NGOCommercial research and development institutionsImporters and exportersGovernment organizations, research organizations, and consulting firmsTrade associations and industry bodiesEnd-use industries

Moreover, it helps new businesses perform a positive assessment of their business plans because it covers a range of subjects market participants must be aware of to remain competitive.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Report identifies various key players in the market and sheds light on their strategies and collaborations to combat competition. The comprehensive report provides a two-dimensional picture of the market. By knowing the global revenue of manufacturers, the global price of manufacturers, and the production by manufacturers during the forecast period of 2022 to Robotic Process Automation (RPA), the reader can identify the footprints of manufacturers in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) industry.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market - Competitive and Segmentation Analysis:

As well as providing an overview of successful marketing strategies, market contributions, and exact developments of leading companies, the report also offers a dashboard overview of leading companies' past and present performance. Several methodologies and analyses are used in the research report to provide in-depth and accurate information about the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market.

The current market dossier provides market growth potential, opportunities, drivers, industry-specific challenges and risks market share along with the growth rate of the global Robotic Process Automation (RPA) market. The report also covers monetary and exchange fluctuations, import-export trade, and global market

status in a smooth-tongued pattern. The SWOT analysis, compiled by industry experts, Industry Concentration Ratio and the latest developments for the global Robotic Process Automation (RPA) market share are covered in a statistical way in the form of tables and figures including graphs and charts for easy understanding.

Get a demo Copy of the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Report 2022

Research Methodology:

Research report world follows a primary and secondary methodology that involves data based on top-down, bottom-up approaches, and validation of the estimated numbers through research. The information used to estimate market size, share, and forecast of various segments-sub segments at the global, country level, regional level is derived from the unique sources and the right stakeholders.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Growth rate or CAGR exhibited by a market certain forecast period is calculate on the basic types, application, company profile and their impact on the market. Secondary Research Information is collected from a number of publicly available as well as paid databases. Public sources involve publications by different associations and governments, annual reports and statements of companies, white papers and research publications by recognized industry experts and renowned academia, etc. Paid data sources include third-party authentic industry databases.

On the basis of product typethis report displays the production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, primarily split into:

● Automated Solution
● Decision Support And Management Solution
● Interaction Solution

On the basis of the end users/applicationsthis report focuses on the status and outlook for major applications/end users, consumption (sales), market share and growth rate for each application, including:

● BFSI
● Healthcare and Pharmaceuticals
● Manufacturing and Logistics
● IT and Telecommunication
● Retail
● Travel
● Hospitality
● Transportation
● Others

Inquire more and share questions if any before the purchase on this report at-https://www.marketgrowthreports.com/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/14199376

Target Audience of Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market:

● Manufacturer / Potential Investors ● Traders, Distributors, Wholesalers, Retailers, Importers and Exporters. ● Association and government bodies.

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market - Regional Analysis:

Geographically, this report is segmented into several key regions, with sales, revenue, market share and growth Rate of Robotic Process Automation (RPA) in these regions, from 2015 to 2025, covering

● North America (United States, Canada and Mexico) ● Europe (Germany, UK, France, Italy, Russia and Turkey etc.) ● Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, Australia, Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines, Malaysia and Vietnam) ● South America (Brazil, Argentina, Columbia etc.) ● Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa)

This Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Research/Analysis Report give Answers to following Questions:

● How Porter's Five Forces model helps you to study Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market? ● What Was Global Market Status of Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market? What Was Capacity, Production Value, Cost and PROFIT of Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market? ● What is the major industry objective of the report? What are the critical discoveries of the report? ● What are the TOP 10 KEY PLAYERS of Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market? ● What Should Be Entry Strategies, Countermeasures to Economic Impact, and Marketing Channels for Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Industry? ● On what Parameters Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market research is carried out? ● Which Manufacturing Technology is used for Robotic Process Automation (RPA)? What Developments Are Going On in That Technology? Which Trends Are Causing These Developments? ● Which PLAYERS hold a LION’s SHARE in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market? ● What is the market size and growth rate of Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market by various segmentation? ● What are the Key Industry Development in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market?

Get a demo PDF of report -https://www.marketgrowthreports.com/enquiry/request-sample/14199376

Our research analysts will help you to get customized details for your report, which can be modified in terms of a specific region, application or any statistical details. In addition, we are always willing to comply with the study, which triangulated with your own data to make the market research more comprehensive in your perspective.

With tables and figures helping analyse worldwide Global Robotic Process Automation (RPA) market trends, this research provides key statistics on the state of the industry and is a valuable source of guidance and direction for companies and individuals interested in the market.

Detailed TOC of Global Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Research Report 2022

1 Introduction

1.1 Objective of the Study

1.2 Definition of the Market

1.3 Market Scope

1.3.1 Market Segment by Type, Application and Marketing Channel

1.3.2 Major Regions Covered (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Mid East and Africa)

1.4 Years Considered for the Study (2015-2025)

1.5 Currency Considered (U.S. Dollar)

1.6 Stakeholders

2 Key Findings of the Study

3 Market Dynamics

3.1 Driving Factors for this Market

3.2 Factors Challenging the Market

3.3 Opportunities of the Global Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market (Regions, Growing/Emerging Downstream Market Analysis)

3.4 Technological and Market Developments in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market

3.5 Industry News by Region

3.6 Regulatory Scenario by Region/Country

3.7 Market Investment Scenario Strategic Recommendations Analysis

4 Value Chain of the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market

4.1 Value Chain Status

4.2 Upstream Raw Material Analysis

4.3 Midstream Major Company Analysis (by Manufacturing Base, by Product Type)

4.4 Distributors/Traders

4.5 Downstream Major Customer Analysis (by Region)

5 Global Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market-Segmentation by Type

Get a demo PDF of report -https://www.marketgrowthreports.com/enquiry/request-sample/14199376

6 Global Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market-Segmentation by Application

7 Global Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market-Segmentation by Marketing Channel

7.1 Traditional Marketing Channel (Offline)

7.2 Online Channel

8 Competitive Intelligence Company Profiles

9 Global Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market-Segmentation by Geography

9.1 North America

9.2 Europe

9.3 Asia-Pacific

9.4 Latin America

9.5 Middle East and Africa

10 Future Forecast of the Global Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market from 2022-2025

10.1 Future Forecast of the Global Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market from 2022-2025 Segment by Region

10.2 Global Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Production and Growth Rate Forecast by Type (2022-2025)

10.3 Global Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Consumption and Growth Rate Forecast by Application (2022-2025)

11 Appendix

11.1 Methodology

12.2 Research Data Source

Continued….

Purchase this report (Price 4900 USD for a single-user license) https://www.marketgrowthreports.com/purchase/14199376

Contact Us:

Market Growth Reports

Phone: US + 1 424 253 0807

UK + 44 203 239 8187

E-mail: sales@marketgrowthreports.com

Web:https://www.marketgrowthreports.com

For More Related Reports Click Here :

Marine Leisure Market for the period 2023 To 2028, Report analyse growth plans with the help of Statistical Figures, SWOT analysis

Industrial Grade Salt Market 2023 Size Industry, Current Trends, Demand and Size Share Estimation by 2028 with SWOT analysis, MarketGrowthReports.com

What is a CAGR of Poly Aluminium Chloride (PAC) Market? Poly Aluminium Chloride (PAC) Market Value in 2028 with Competition Analysis Data of Top Key Players

Automotive Financing Market Insights: Industry changing aspects, New Technologies and Forecast to 2028 | Market Growth Reports

By 2025, Automotive Embedded Telematics Market 2023 is progresses across Manufacturing and Industrial Capabilities with Statistical Significance Owing, Investment Feasibility

Contact Adhesives Market 2023 Expected to Reach Significant Rate by 2026

Diffraction Gratings Market Insights: Industry changing aspects, New Technologies and Forecast to 2028 | Market Growth Reports

Fumaric Acid Market 2023 Size Industry, Current Trends, Demand and Size Share Estimation by 2025 with Top Players MarketGrowthReports.com

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Market 2023 Expected to Reach Significant Rate by 2027

Alarm Clock Market Analysis Report 2023 Along with Statistics Figures, Forecasts till 2028

Press Release Distributed by The Express Wire

To view the original version on The Express Wire visit Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Analysis Report 2023 Along with Statistics Figures, Forecasts till 2025

COMTEX_420050230/2598/2022-12-02T01:36:41

Is there a problem with this press release? Contact the source provider Comtex at editorial@comtex.com. You can also contact MarketWatch Customer Service via our Customer Center.

The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.

Thu, 01 Dec 2022 16:58:00 -0600 en-US text/html https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/robotic-process-automation-rpa-market-analysis-report-2023-along-with-statistics-figures-forecasts-till-2025-2022-12-02
Killexams : Understanding exact colonoscopy study

Understanding exact colonoscopy study

WELCOME BACK. A NEW STUDY FROM THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE TOOK A LOOK AT HOW EFFECTIVE COLON B’S ARE. DR. ROGERIO LIN FROM JUPITER MEDICAL CENTER JOINS US THIS MORNING TO BREAK DOWN THIS STUDY AND EXPLAIN WHY THESE SCREENINGS SO IMPORTANT. WELCOME, DOCTOR. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR BEING HERE. SO FIRST, I DO WANT TO GET THIS STUDY. IT WAS DONE IN EUROPE, CORRECT? OKAY. TELL US ABOUT WHAT THE STUDY REVEALED. SURE. THANKS FOR HAVING ME. FIRST, THE STUDY WAS CONDUCTED IN POLAND, NORWAY, SWEDEN AND THE NETHERLANDS. IT HAD 85,000 PARTICIPANTS, 28,000 OF THOSE PARTICIPANTS, AN INVITATION TO UNDERGO SCREENING COLONOSCOPY. THE OTHER 57,000 PEOPLE WERE JUST FOLLOWED AS. OKAY. RIGHT. AND THEN AT THE OF TEN YEARS, THEY REALIZED THAT FOR THOSE WHO WERE IN ENTIRE STUDY. EIGHT. THERE WAS A REDUCTION OF 18% IN THE RISK OF DEVELOPING COLORECTAL CANCER. HOWEVER, AN IMPORTANT LEAP FOR THE STUDY, THERE WAS NO REDUCTION IN MORTALITY FROM CANCER. SO WHAT WAS THE CONCERN FOR YOU AND OTHER DOCTORS ALSO AFTER THAT STUDY WAS PUBLISHED? COLONOSCOPIES CONSIDERED IN SCREENING TECHNIQUE. AND IT DOES SAVE LIVES. SO THE FACT THAT THIS STUDY DID NOT SHOW A REDUCTION IN THE RISK OF DEATH WAS QUITE WORRISOME FOR ALL OF US. YEAH. AND YOU GUYS WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU GET AN IMPORTANT MESSAGE OUT HERE TODAY. YES. SO WHEN YOU TAKE A DEEPER INTO THE STUDY, YOU REALIZE THAT OF THOSE INVITED TO HAVE THE COLONOSCOPY, ONLY 42% ACTUALLY HAD THE TEST. SO LESS THAN HALF OF THE INDIVIDUALS VISUALS ACTUALLY WERE SCREENED WITH THE COLONOSCOPY. AND IF YOU TAKE THAT SUBSET OUT THOSE HAD A 31% REDUCTION IN THE RISK HAVING CANCER IN A 50% REDUCTION IN THE RISK OF MORTALITY. SO THE MESSAGE HERE IS TO GO AHEAD, GET THAT COLONOSCOPY TO, DO THAT SCREENING. SO JUST A REMINDER FOR PEOPLE, YOU KNOW, WHY ARE THEY SO IMPORTANT? AND THIS IS AN IMPORTANT TECHNIQUE TO DETECT CANCER AT AN EARLY AND ACTUALLY PRE-CANCEROUS LESIONS FROM THE COLON AND THE RECTUM. COLONOSCOPY SAVES LIVES. IT’S AN IMPORTANT TECHNIQUE FOR US TO DECREASE THE OVERALL MORTALITY FROM CANCER IN THE UNITED STATES AND IN WORLD. AND DR. LINDBLOM, THERE’S BEEN SO MANY ADVANCES OVER JUST THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS FOR PEOPLE. YEAH. SO EVEN FOR THOSE WHO ARE DIAGNOSED WITH COLON CANCER, -- CANCER TREATMENT TODAY IS MUCH MORE EFFECTIVE. IT USED TO BE A DECADE OR TWO DECADES AGO. SO IT’S IMPORTANT TO HAVE THAT STUDY. IF YOU HAVE CANCER, IMPORTANT TO CATCH IT AT AN EARLY STAGE. AND THOSE WHO ARE DIAGNOSED WITH EARLY STAGE COLORECTAL CANCER HAVE A VERY VERY HIGH CHANCE OF BEING CURATIVE THAT DISEASE. OKAY. SO JUST REMIND US AGAIN WHO, SHOULD BE GETTING THESE SCREENINGS. HOW OFTEN, WHAT AGE SHOULD THEY START? SO FOR THE AVERAGE PERSON YOU SHOULD AT AGE 45 AND GO UNTIL 75. ALL RIGHT. SOME INDIVIDUALS MAY GO BEYOND 75, BUT THAT’S THE USUAL RECOMMENDATION, PEOPLE WHO HAVE OTHER RISK FACTORS FOR COLON CANCER, A FAMILY HISTORY, WHO HAVE HAD A LESION REMOVED BEFORE THEY HAVE TO START BEFORE THE AGE OF 45 AND THEY NEED TO DO IT MORE FREQUENTLY. OKAY. SO IF YOU’RE STARTING AT THE AGE OF 45, HOW OFTEN SHOULD YOU DO IT? SO IF YOU HAVE YOUR FIRST COLONOSCOPY AT AGE 45 AND IT’S COMPLETELY NORMAL, CAN WAIT TEN YEARS. OH, LOOK AT THAT. YES. IF THERE’S A FINDING, YOU MAY HAVE TO COME BACK IN ABOUT THREE YEARS OR FIVE YEARS TO HAVE IT DONE AGAIN. OKAY WELL, ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT TO SHARE THAT? I DIDN’T ASK YOU OR WE DIDN’T TOUCH UPON? YEAH. IS AN IMPORTANT PROBLEM. AND WE CAN CONVINCE TO HAVE SCREENING TESTS NOT JUST FOR COLON CANCER, FOR LUNG CANCER, FOR BREAST CANCER, FOR PROSTATE CANCER. WE WILL THE FACE OF THE DISEASE IN, THE FUTURE. ALL RIGHT. WELL, THANK YOU SO MUCH TO US. AND PUTTING OUT THIS IMPORTANT MESSAGE. IF YOU WANT MORE INFORMATION, YOU

Understanding exact colonoscopy study

The New England Journal of Medicine published a exact study conducted in Europe regarding the effectiveness of colonoscopies as a screening tool.Dr. Rogerio Lilenbaum, Chief Physician Executive at Jupiter Medical Center, stopped by our studios to speak on the importance of the screening procedure. Never miss anything: Sign up for personalized newsletters and alerts from WPBF 25 News

The New England Journal of Medicine published a exact study conducted in Europe regarding the effectiveness of colonoscopies as a screening tool.

Dr. Rogerio Lilenbaum, Chief Physician Executive at Jupiter Medical Center, stopped by our studios to speak on the importance of the screening procedure.

Never miss anything: Sign up for personalized newsletters and alerts from WPBF 25 News

Fri, 18 Nov 2022 01:02:00 -0600 en text/html https://www.wpbf.com/article/understanding-recent-colonoscopy-study/42004109
Killexams : STUDY: 74% of IT Decision-Makers Side with IT Vendors Who Prioritize Education

Foundry (formerly IDG Communications, Inc.)

Foundry’s new research also found product demos are a critical, invaluable tool for IT decision-make

Boston, MA, Nov. 17, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Foundry (an IDG, Inc. company), the global leader in media, martech and data for the tech community, today released the 2022 Customer Engagement Study to gain a better understanding of the various types and volume of content consumed throughout the purchase process for major technology products and services. In its ninth year, the study provides insight into the engagement preferences of IT decision-makers (ITDMs) when it comes to technology vendor follow-up and relationships.

IT decision-makers have increased pressure on them to provide technology solutions for economic disruptions. Because of this, technology professionals are seeking out more information to help them meet their business needs. Now more than ever, they need relevant and reliable educational resources placed in their paths as they explore solutions.

As a result, the study shows 74% of ITDMs are more likely to consider an IT vendor who educates them through each stage of the decision process. A similar number of respondents (72%) report that if a vendor does not supply educational content during research, it negatively impacts their impression. A majority (91%) say it’s challenging to find high-quality information, with the top reasons being due to lack of truly independent, unbiased information, too much marketing hype or empty buzzwords, and that the information is too general.

Here is a closer look at the survey’s findings:

Understanding Content Value and Timing

While the majority (91%) of ITDMs are willing to register for content from a technology vendor, not all content is helpful as only 48% stated their downloaded work-related content has provided them with value over the last 12 months, up from 41% in 2021. To receive value, an overwhelming majority (96%) of ITDMs are interested in custom tailored content, with the top customizations being by industry (54%), technology platform(s) they already have installed at their organization (49%), company size (31%), and job responsibilities (28%).

When downloading content, ITDMs typically read or consume it an average of 3 days after. However, 43% will read it that day, and 32% will read it 2-3 days after. So it’s important for technology vendors to think of this timeframe prior to following up with the prospect.

It’s important for tech vendors to think about these customizations and preferences prior to outreach as well. The survey states 96% of ITDMs have responded to outreach from a potential vendor. However, respondents said they are more likely to respond if the vendor shared valuable content or information with them (50%), was knowledgeable about their business/specific challenges (45%), demonstrated honesty/transparency (43%), reached out at the right time (37%), and showed respect for their time (37%).

When IT decision-makers fill out a form to be contacted, the expected follow-up time is much more prompt, lowering to 16 hours compared to 19 hours in 2021. Almost one-third (31%) expect a response within 24 hours, and 30% expect a near immediate response within 6 hours.

“Developing content to provide value is a significant part of how vendors can help IT leadership navigate their purchase decisions, but vendors need to understand how the role of technology continues accelerating,” said Stacey Raap, Marketing & Research Manager, Foundry. “Using appropriate channels and knowing the right time to make contact with a prospect can be a critical component of having a positive engagement.”

Curating Content to Maximize Impact and Value

When asked which types of content ITDMs rely on most throughout the purchase process, the top five are product testing/reviews/opinions (49%), product demo/product literature (44%), technology news (43%), vendor presentations (41%), and analyst research (35%). Buyer’s guides (18%), opinion columns (12%), and vendor directories (10%) are labeled the least relied on.

By the purchase process stage, technology news is the number one content type relied upon when determining the business need. Product testing and product demos are top pieces of content relied upon when determining tech requirements, evaluating products and services, and recommending vendors. When selling internally, analyst research comes more into play and how-to content becomes more popular in the post-sale process.

Almost all IT decision-makers (97%) say they have received value from a product demo. The most useful formats are a limited time, full function trial (52%), an in-person demonstration of how the product works (51%), and a virtual live demonstration (44%). When researching a new technology, information subjects of most interest are business value of the technology, pain points the technology addresses, and skills/roles information needed due to the technology.

When looking at the desired length of content, the data shows ITDMs have the highest tolerance for webcast (16.4 minutes) and in-depth product reviews (16.3 minutes), followed by interviews with industry experts (14.6 minutes), and how-to videos (14.3 minutes). The data also shows the average desired length of a podcast is 12.5 minutes, and average written content is 4.6 pages for research survey results/analyst research and 4.5 pages for white papers/case studies.

About 2022 Customer Engagement Study

Foundry’s 2022 Customer Engagement Study was conducted among the audience of 624 IT and business decision-makers. Foundry conducted this survey to better understand the various types and volume of content consumed throughout the purchase process for major technology products and services. All respondents had IT or management titles, with 53% based in North America, 28% in Asia/Pacific (APAC) regions, and 18% from Europe/Middle East/Africa (EMEA).

To learn more about this year’s Customer Engagement Study, obtain the white paper here.

About Foundry, an IDG, Inc. company

Foundry has played a key role in every major milestone, announcement, and development in modern technology since 1964. Today, Foundry continues to lead in the technology space by helping companies bring their visions to reality through a combination of media, marketing technologies and proprietary data. Our technology platforms of Triblio, Selling Simplified, KickFire and LeadSift are powered by data from an owned and operated ecosystem of global editorial brands, awards, and events, all engineered and integrated to drive marketing campaigns for technology companies. Foundry is dedicated to generating and innovating with data, driving demand for technology marketers with 38 offices in markets around the globe. Foundry is a wholly owned subsidiary of International Data Group, Inc. (IDG), the world’s leading market intelligence and demand generation company focused on the technology industry.

To learn more about Foundry, visit www.foundryco.com.

CONTACT: Stacey Raap Marketing & Research Manager stacey_raap@idg.com
Thu, 17 Nov 2022 00:18:00 -0600 en-US text/html https://finance.yahoo.com/news/study-74-decision-makers-side-140000545.html
Killexams : RPA and Hyper Automation Market 2022 Size, Revenue Analysis, Sales, Share and Research Depth Study 2028

The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.

Nov 26, 2022 (The Expresswire) -- Final Report will add the analysis of the impact of Russia-Ukraine War and COVID-19 on this industry.

"RPA and Hyper Automation Market" Insights 2022 - By Applications ( Manufacturing, Automotive, Healthcare, Other), By Types ( Intelligent Process Automation, Hyperautomation), By Segmentation analysis, Regions and Forecast to 2028. The Global RPA and Hyper Automation market Report provides In-depth analysis on the market status of the RPA and Hyper Automation Top manufacturers with best facts and figures, meaning, Definition, SWOT analysis, PESTAL analysis, expert opinions and the latest developments across the globe., the RPA and Hyper Automation Market Report contains Full TOC, Tables and Figures, and Chart with Key Analysis, Pre and Post COVID-19 Market Outbreak Impact Analysis and Situation by Regions.

RPA and Hyper Automation Market Size is projected to Reach Multimillion USD by 2028, In comparison to 2021, at unexpected CAGR during the forecast Period 2022-2028.

Browse Detailed TOC, Tables and Figures with Charts that provides exclusive data, information, vital statistics, trends, and competitive landscape details in this niche sector.

Considering the economic change due to COVID-19 and Russia-Ukraine War Influence, RPA and Hyper Automation, which accounted for % of the global market of RPA and Hyper Automation in 2021

TO KNOW HOW COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND RUSSIA UKRAINE WAR WILL IMPACT THIS MARKET - REQUEST SAMPLE

Moreover, it helps new businesses perform a positive assessment of their business plans because it covers a range of subjects market participants must be aware of to remain competitive.

RPA and Hyper Automation Market Report identifies various key players in the market and sheds light on their strategies and collaborations to combat competition. The comprehensive report provides a two-dimensional picture of the market. By knowing the global revenue of manufacturers, the global price of manufacturers, and the production by manufacturers during the forecast period of 2022 to 2028, the reader can identify the footprints of manufacturers in the RPA and Hyper Automation industry.

Get a demo PDF of report -https://www.360researchreports.com/enquiry/request-sample/21598791

RPA and Hyper Automation Market - Competitive and Segmentation Analysis:

RPA and Hyper Automation Market Reportproviding an overview of successful marketing strategies, market contributions, and exact developments of leading companies, the report also offers a dashboard overview of leading companies' past and present performance. Several methodologies and analyses are used in the research report to provide in-depth and accurate information about the RPA and Hyper Automation Market.

The Major players covered in the RPA and Hyper Automation market report are:

● IBM (US)
● Microsoft (US)
● SAP (Germany)
● Alteryx (US)
● Appian (US)
● Juniper Networks (US)
● NICE (Israel)
● Zendesk (US)
● Pegasystems (US)
● Automation Anywhere (US)
● UiPath (US)
● ProcessMaker (US)
● SolveXia (Australia)
● PagerDuty (US)

Short Description About RPA and Hyper Automation Market:

The Global RPA and Hyper Automation market is anticipated to rise at a considerable rate during the forecast period, between 2022 and 2028. In 2021, the market is growing at a steady rate and with the rising adoption of strategies by key players, the market is expected to rise over the projected horizon.

Highlights

The global RPA and Hyper Automation market is projected to reach USD million by 2028 from an estimated USD million in 2022, at a CAGR of % during 2023 and 2028.

North American market for RPA and Hyper Automation is estimated to increase from USD million in 2022 to reach USD million by 2028, at a CAGR of % during the forecast period of 2023 through 2028.

Asia-Pacific market for RPA and Hyper Automation is estimated to increase from USD million in 2022 to reach USD million by 2028, at a CAGR of % during the forecast period of 2022 through 2028.

The major global companies of RPA and Hyper Automation include IBM (US), Microsoft (US), SAP (Germany), Alteryx (US), Appian (US), Juniper Networks (US), NICE (Israel), Zendesk (US), Pegasystems (US), Automation Anywhere (US), UiPath (US), ProcessMaker (US), SolveXia (Australia), PagerDuty (US)etc. In 2021, the world's top three vendors accounted for approximately % of the revenue.

The global market for RPA and Hyper Automation is estimated to increase from USD million in 2022 to USD million by 2028, at a CAGR of % during the forecast period of 2022 through 2028.

Report Scope

This report aims to provide a comprehensive presentation of the global market for RPA and Hyper Automation, with both quantitative and qualitative analysis, to help readers develop business/growth strategies, assess the market competitive situation, analyze their position in the current marketplace, and make informed business decisions regarding RPA and Hyper Automation.

The RPA and Hyper Automation market size, estimations, and forecasts are provided in terms of output/shipments (K PCs) and revenue (USD millions), considering 2021 as the base year, with history and forecast data for the period from 2017 to 2028. This report segments the global RPA and Hyper Automation market comprehensively. Regional market sizes, concerning products by types, by application, and by players, are also provided. The influence of COVID-19 and the Russia-Ukraine War were considered while estimating market sizes.

For a more in-depth understanding of the market, the report provides profiles of the competitive landscape, key competitors, and their respective market ranks. The report also discusses technological trends and new product developments.

The report will help the RPA and Hyper Automation manufacturers, new entrants, and industry chain related companies in this market with information on the revenues, production, and average price for the overall market and the sub-segments across the different segments, by company, product type, application, and regions.

Get a demo Copy of the RPA and Hyper Automation Report 2022

RPA and Hyper Automation Market is further classified on the basis of region as follows:

● North America (United States, Canada and Mexico) ● Europe (Germany, UK, France, Italy, Russia and Turkey etc.) ● Asia-Pacific (China, Japan, Korea, India, Australia, Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines, Malaysia and Vietnam) ● South America (Brazil, Argentina, Columbia etc.) ● Middle East and Africa (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa)

This RPA and Hyper Automation Market Research/Analysis Report Contains Answers to your following Questions

● What are the global trends in the RPA and Hyper Automation market? Would the market witness an increase or decline in the demand in the coming years? ● What is the estimated demand for different types of products in RPA and Hyper Automation? What are the upcoming industry applications and trends for RPA and Hyper Automation market? ● What Are Projections of Global RPA and Hyper Automation Industry Considering Capacity, Production and Production Value? What Will Be the Estimation of Cost and Profit? What Will Be Market Share, Supply and Consumption? What about Import and Export? ● Where will the strategic developments take the industry in the mid to long-term? ● What are the factors contributing to the final price of RPA and Hyper Automation? What are the raw materials used for RPA and Hyper Automation manufacturing? ● How big is the opportunity for the RPA and Hyper Automation market? How will the increasing adoption of RPA and Hyper Automation for mining impact the growth rate of the overall market? ● How much is the global RPA and Hyper Automation market worth? What was the value of the market In 2020? ● Who are the major players operating in the RPA and Hyper Automation market? Which companies are the front runners? ● Which are the exact industry trends that can be implemented to generate additional revenue streams? ● What Should Be Entry Strategies, Countermeasures to Economic Impact, and Marketing Channels for RPA and Hyper Automation Industry?

Customization of the Report

Our research analysts will help you to get customized details for your report, which can be modified in terms of a specific region, application or any statistical details. In addition, we are always willing to comply with the study, which triangulated with your own data to make the market research more comprehensive in your perspective.

Inquire more and share questions if any before the purchase on this report at -https://www.360researchreports.com/enquiry/pre-order-enquiry/21598791

Detailed TOC of Global RPA and Hyper Automation Market Insights and Forecast to 2028

1 RPA and Hyper Automation Market Overview
1.1 Product Overview and Scope of RPA and Hyper Automation
1.2 RPA and Hyper Automation Segment by Type
1.2.1 Global RPA and Hyper Automation Market Size Growth Rate Analysis by Type 2022 VS 2028
1.3 RPA and Hyper Automation Segment by Application
1.3.1 Global RPA and Hyper Automation Consumption Comparison by Application: 2022 VS 2028
1.4 Global Market Growth Prospects
1.4.1 Global RPA and Hyper Automation Revenue Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.4.2 Global RPA and Hyper Automation Production Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.5 Global Market Size by Region
1.5.1 Global RPA and Hyper Automation Market Size Estimates and Forecasts by Region: 2017 VS 2021 VS 2028
1.5.2 North America RPA and Hyper Automation Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.5.3 Europe RPA and Hyper Automation Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.5.4 China RPA and Hyper Automation Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.5.5 Japan RPA and Hyper Automation Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)
1.5.6 South Korea RPA and Hyper Automation Estimates and Forecasts (2017-2028)

2 Market Competition by Manufacturers
2.1 Global RPA and Hyper Automation Production Market Share by Manufacturers (2017-2022)
2.2 Global RPA and Hyper Automation Revenue Market Share by Manufacturers (2017-2022)
2.3 RPA and Hyper Automation Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3)
2.4 Global RPA and Hyper Automation Average Price by Manufacturers (2017-2022)
2.5 Manufacturers RPA and Hyper Automation Production Sites, Area Served, Product Types
2.6 RPA and Hyper Automation Market Competitive Situation and Trends
2.6.1 RPA and Hyper Automation Market Concentration Rate
2.6.2 Global 5 and 10 Largest RPA and Hyper Automation Players Market Share by Revenue
2.6.3 Mergers and Acquisitions, Expansion

3 Production by Region
3.1 Global Production of RPA and Hyper Automation Market Share by Region (2017-2022)
3.2 Global RPA and Hyper Automation Revenue Market Share by Region (2017-2022)
3.3 Global RPA and Hyper Automation Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
3.4 North America RPA and Hyper Automation Production
3.4.1 North America RPA and Hyper Automation Production Growth Rate (2017-2022)
3.4.2 North America RPA and Hyper Automation Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
3.5 Europe RPA and Hyper Automation Production
3.5.1 Europe RPA and Hyper Automation Production Growth Rate (2017-2022)
3.5.2 Europe RPA and Hyper Automation Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
3.6 China RPA and Hyper Automation Production
3.6.1 China RPA and Hyper Automation Production Growth Rate (2017-2022)
3.6.2 China RPA and Hyper Automation Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
3.7 Japan RPA and Hyper Automation Production
3.7.1 Japan RPA and Hyper Automation Production Growth Rate (2017-2022)
3.7.2 Japan RPA and Hyper Automation Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
3.8 South Korea RPA and Hyper Automation Production
3.8.1 South Korea RPA and Hyper Automation Production Growth Rate (2017-2022)
3.8.2 South Korea RPA and Hyper Automation Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)

4 Global RPA and Hyper Automation Consumption by Region
4.1 Global RPA and Hyper Automation Consumption by Region
4.1.1 Global RPA and Hyper Automation Consumption by Region
4.1.2 Global RPA and Hyper Automation Consumption Market Share by Region
4.2 North America
4.2.1 North America RPA and Hyper Automation Consumption by Country
4.2.2 United States
4.2.3 Canada
4.3 Europe
4.3.1 Europe RPA and Hyper Automation Consumption by Country
4.3.2 Germany
4.3.3 France
4.3.4 U.K.
4.3.5 Italy
4.3.6 Russia
4.4 Asia Pacific
4.4.1 Asia Pacific RPA and Hyper Automation Consumption by Region
4.4.2 China
4.4.3 Japan
4.4.4 South Korea
4.4.5 China Taiwan
4.4.6 Southeast Asia
4.4.7 India
4.4.8 Australia
4.5 Latin America
4.5.1 Latin America RPA and Hyper Automation Consumption by Country
4.5.2 Mexico
4.5.3 Brazil

5 Segment by Type
5.1 Global RPA and Hyper Automation Production Market Share by Type (2017-2022)
5.2 Global RPA and Hyper Automation Revenue Market Share by Type (2017-2022)
5.3 Global RPA and Hyper Automation Price by Type (2017-2022)

6 Segment by Application
6.1 Global RPA and Hyper Automation Production Market Share by Application (2017-2022)
6.2 Global RPA and Hyper Automation Revenue Market Share by Application (2017-2022)
6.3 Global RPA and Hyper Automation Price by Application (2017-2022)

7 Key Companies Profiled
7.1 Company 1
7.1.1 Company 1 RPA and Hyper Automation Corporation Information
7.1.2 Company 1 RPA and Hyper Automation Product Portfolio
7.1.3 Company 1 RPA and Hyper Automation Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2017-2022)
7.1.4 Company 1 Main Business and Markets Served
7.1.5 Company 1 exact Developments/Updates

Continued..

8 RPA and Hyper Automation Manufacturing Cost Analysis
8.1 RPA and Hyper Automation Key Raw Materials Analysis
8.1.1 Key Raw Materials
8.1.2 Key Suppliers of Raw Materials
8.2 Proportion of Manufacturing Cost Structure
8.3 Manufacturing Process Analysis of RPA and Hyper Automation
8.4 RPA and Hyper Automation Industrial Chain Analysis

9 Marketing Channel, Distributors and Customers
9.1 Marketing Channel
9.2 RPA and Hyper Automation Distributors List
9.3 RPA and Hyper Automation Customers

10 Market Dynamics
10.1 RPA and Hyper Automation Industry Trends
10.2 RPA and Hyper Automation Market Drivers
10.3 RPA and Hyper Automation Market Challenges
10.4 RPA and Hyper Automation Market Restraints

11 Production and Supply Forecast
11.1 Global Forecasted Production of RPA and Hyper Automation by Region (2023-2028)
11.2 North America RPA and Hyper Automation Production, Revenue Forecast (2023-2028)
11.3 Europe RPA and Hyper Automation Production, Revenue Forecast (2023-2028)
11.4 China RPA and Hyper Automation Production, Revenue Forecast (2023-2028)
11.5 Japan RPA and Hyper Automation Production, Revenue Forecast (2023-2028)
11.6 South Korea RPA and Hyper Automation Production, Revenue Forecast (2023-2028)

12 Consumption and Demand Forecast
12.1 Global Forecasted Demand Analysis of RPA and Hyper Automation
12.2 North America Forecasted Consumption of RPA and Hyper Automation by Country
12.3 Europe Market Forecasted Consumption of RPA and Hyper Automation by Country
12.4 Asia Pacific Market Forecasted Consumption of RPA and Hyper Automation by Region
12.5 Latin America Forecasted Consumption of RPA and Hyper Automation by Country

13 Forecast by Type and by Application (2023-2028)
13.1 Global Production, Revenue and Price Forecast by Type (2023-2028)
13.1.1 Global Forecasted Production of RPA and Hyper Automation by Type (2023-2028)
13.1.2 Global Forecasted Revenue of RPA and Hyper Automation by Type (2023-2028)
13.1.3 Global Forecasted Price of RPA and Hyper Automation by Type (2023-2028)
13.2 Global Forecasted Consumption of RPA and Hyper Automation by Application (2023-2028)
13.2.1 Global Forecasted Production of RPA and Hyper Automation by Application (2023-2028)
13.2.2 Global Forecasted Revenue of RPA and Hyper Automation by Application (2023-2028)
13.2.3 Global Forecasted Price of RPA and Hyper Automation by Application (2023-2028)

14 Research Finding and Conclusion

15 Methodology and Data Source
15.1 Methodology/Research Approach
15.1.1 Research Programs/Design
15.1.2 Market Size Estimation
15.1.3 Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
15.2 Data Source
15.2.1 Secondary Sources
15.2.2 Primary Sources
15.3 Author List
15.4 Disclaimer

Purchase this report (Price 3660 USD for a single-user license) -https://www.360researchreports.com/purchase/21598791

About Us:

360 Research Reports is the credible source for gaining the market reports that will provide you with the lead your business needs. At 360 Research Reports, our objective is providing a platform for many top-notch market research firms worldwide to publish their research reports, as well as helping the decision makers in finding most suitable market research solutions under one roof. Our aim is to provide the best solution that matches the exact customer requirements. This drives us to provide you with custom or syndicated research reports.

Press Release Distributed by The Express Wire

To view the original version on The Express Wire visit RPA and Hyper Automation Market 2022 Size, Revenue Analysis, Sales, Share and Research Depth Study 2028

COMTEX_419748575/2598/2022-11-26T09:07:40

Is there a problem with this press release? Contact the source provider Comtex at editorial@comtex.com. You can also contact MarketWatch Customer Service via our Customer Center.

The MarketWatch News Department was not involved in the creation of this content.

Fri, 25 Nov 2022 23:07:00 -0600 en-US text/html https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/rpa-and-hyper-automation-market-2022-size-revenue-analysis-sales-share-and-research-depth-study-2028-2022-11-26
Killexams : DIY investors make worse decision when platforms ‘gamify’ trading, study says

Trading platforms that reward do-it-yourself investors through “gamification” strategies are increasing the risk of losses in online portfolios, a new study says.

In a research report scheduled to be released on Thursday, the Ontario Securities Commission in collaboration with British-based Behavioural Insights Team found that investors who received rewards from trading platforms – such as digital points or online badges for buying or selling stocks – made almost 40 per cent more trades than those who were not exposed to the same gamification rewards.

Gamification is the practice of incentivizing users to trade more frequently or in larger amounts by adding game-like features to trading platforms. Competitive features such as leaderboards, which display the names of users who do the most trades per day, or images of badges or bursts of confetti that reward a first trade in a margin account or a family referral, are encouraging investors to trade more often.

Investing apps 101: What apps are available in Canada and are they safe?

Regulators face pressure to review discount brokerage rules as DIY investors turn to social-media posts for advice

As well, the OSC found investors who were shown lists of “top-traded” or “most popular” stocks were 14 per cent more likely to buy and sell the company shares that they are nudged toward. Top-stock lists promote “herding” behaviour – where a person follows what others are doing rather than deciding independently.

Herding can result in “significantly poorer” returns for investors, the report said, citing a separate study that showed an average 20-day return of minus 4.7 per cent for top stocks purchased each day. That’s because herding increases trading frequency, and can shift investors into higher-risk securities.

Other incentives, such as setting up a goal tracker, were found not to have any negative correlation to an investor’s behaviour or how often he or she traded.

As a result, the OSC is recommending regulators – such as the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada, which oversees discount brokerages – consider whether to limit digital-trading platforms from offering points or rewards for trading activity.

“More broadly, we encourage regulators to consider whether any of the gamification and behavioural techniques examined have attributes similar to recommendations and/or result in investor behaviour that is [on average] detrimental to investor outcomes,” the OSC added.

The study involved 2,430 participants, who were given $10,000 in play money to buy and sell stocks in a simulated, digital-trading environment.

During the pandemic, Ontario’s provincial watchdog began to pay closer attention to the impact of gamification on retail investing as the number of DIY investors – many of whom were new to investing – began to rise as Canadians poured COVID-19 savings into the market.

Also known as order-execution-only (OEO) websites, discount brokerages are prohibited by regulations from providing any type of investing advice to clients. But the lack of advice is now becoming problematic for trading platforms that have growing numbers of unsophisticated investors.

In 2021, more than 3.6 million new DIY accounts were opened at discount brokerages, according to data provided by Toronto-based Investor Economics, a unit of ISS Market Intelligence. That was an increase from 2.3 million in 2020, and 846,000 in 2019.

As well, a wave of mobile-only, self-directed platforms have emerged in both Canada and the United States, along with several zero-fee trading platforms, increasing the number of participants who can easily set up accounts with a few clicks on a phone.

The gamification business model first grew in popularity with U.S.-based fintech startup Robinhood Markets Inc. HOOD-Q, a zero-fee online trading platform. Robinhood began to reward its users for trading more frequently, trading with larger amounts, and trading in much riskier products, such as margin accounts.

In 2021, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission flagged concerns about gamification, saying the features may encourage investors to trade more often, invest in products that may not be appropriate for them, or influence their risk tolerance.

The OSC, in its report, found several incentives that can affect an investor’s behaviour. In addition to leaderboards and badges, some discount brokerages may use “gamblification” – rewards with economic benefits such as cash payouts or language that evokes gambling, such as jackpots or scratch cards.

“Trading frequency or volume is a critical behaviour of interest, given the strong negative correlation with investor return,” the OSC said in its report. “Offering rewards [points] with negligible economic value may dramatically increase trading frequency.”

The study urges regulators to close “major gaps” in empirical evidence by collecting more data through studies as well as data that can be collected directly from digital-trading platforms that have implemented gamification or other behavioural techniques.

“These actions will enable the OSC and other regulators to set new empirically-driven regulatory strategies and approaches,” the OSC added.

Wed, 16 Nov 2022 20:27:00 -0600 en-CA text/html https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-trading-platforms-gamification-diy-investors-loss/
Killexams : Got the sniffles? Here's how to make the right decision around family gatherings

With what some are calling a "tripledemic" of COVID-19, the influenza virus and respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV, soaring in many parts of the country, the holiday season will come with some tough decisions again this year:

Should you go to that Thanksgiving gathering even though you woke up with the sniffles? Send your child to that school performance even though she was coughing last night? Wear a mask to the grocery store after you learned your friend has COVID-19?

New University of Colorado Boulder research, published in the journal PNAS Nexus, shows that when people simply take a moment to reflect on the consequences of their behavior they tend to choose options that impose fewer risks on other people.

The international study of 13,000 people also found that, almost universally, people value others' health and wellbeing.

"Most people aspire to behave in a way that considers others' wellbeing but often, in the moment, they behave more selfishly than they aspire to," said senior author Leaf Van Boven, a professor of psychology and neuroscience at CU Boulder. "Our lab is trying to devise ways to help people better align their in-the-moment behavior with their values."

For the study, conducted at the height of the pandemic, Van Boven and collaborators in London, Austria, Singapore, Israel, Italy and Sweden presented participants in those countries and the United States with three hypothetical scenarios:

In one, they owned a small restaurant and were considering reducing capacity as the virus surged.

In another, they were supposed to meet with 50 friends for a birthday party after months of isolation but their government cautioned that, due to a COVID-19 surge, gatherings of 10 or more were unwise.

In a third, they considered whether to cancel a planned Thanksgiving celebration with 30 family members, including older adults and young children.

Before making a decision, half of study subjects were instructed to pause and practice a technique called "structured reflection," developed in Van Boven's lab, aimed at helping people be more mindful of their own values.

They asked themselves two questions contrasting how their decision would impact them personally vs. how it would impact public health. For instance, in the Thanksgiving scenario, they asked,

"How much (on a scale of 1 to 7) should your decision be influenced by the likelihood that COVID-19 may spread among family members?" And "How much should your decision be influenced by your satisfaction of spending time with family members?"

Across all countries, cultures, ages and political parties, almost everyone gave at least equal weight to others' wellbeing.

"That's encouraging," said Van Boven. "Our study and others suggest it is a universal human tendency that people believe they should care about how their behavior affects other people."

Those in the structured reflection group were significantly more likely to say they would cancel Thanksgiving, and in the other scenarios they were more likely to err on the side of minimizing public health risks.

Van Boven said that such techniques could be applied to achieve a host of public health goals in which in-the-moment personal benefit tends to overshadow broader public health considerations.

"People know that they should not text while driving, that it's better for the planet if they take the bus instead of drive, that they should eat more vegetables and exercise, but knowing is only the first step," Van Boven said.

While public health campaigns often focus on changing people's minds, Van Boven's team takes a different approach: to help people be their best selves and do what they already know they should do.

As COVID-19 restrictions lift, such personal responsibility will grow increasingly important, he said.

"I would encourage everyone to develop a habit of asking themselves when they are considering any sort of large social gathering: What is the risk you might impose on other people and is the benefit of the gathering worth the risk?"

Wed, 16 Nov 2022 09:02:00 -0600 en text/html https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/11/221116150645.htm
Killexams : Got the sniffles? International study examines how people make the right decision about holiday gatherings

With what some are calling a "tripledemic" of COVID-19, the influenza virus and respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV, already soaring in many parts of the country, the holiday season will come with some tough decisions again this year:

Should you go to that Thanksgiving gathering even though you woke up with the sniffles? Send your child to that school performance even though she was coughing last night? Wear a mask to the after you learned your friend has COVID-19?

New University of Colorado Boulder research, published this month in the journal PNAS Nexus, shows that when people simply take a moment to reflect on the consequences of their behavior they tend to choose options that impose fewer risks on other people.

The international study of 13,000 people also found that, almost universally, people value others' health and well-being.

"Most people aspire to behave in a way that considers others' well-being but often, in the moment, they behave more selfishly than they aspire to," said senior author Leaf Van Boven, a professor of psychology and neuroscience at CU Boulder. "Our lab is trying to devise ways to help people better align their in-the-moment behavior with their values."

A global look at personal values

For the study, conducted at the height of the pandemic, Van Boven and collaborators in London, Austria, Singapore, Israel, Italy and Sweden presented participants in those countries and the United States with three :

In one, they owned a small restaurant and were considering reducing capacity as the virus surged.

In another, they were supposed to meet with 50 friends for a after months of isolation but their government cautioned that, due to a COVID-19 surge, gatherings of 10 or more were unwise.

In a third, they considered whether to cancel a planned Thanksgiving celebration with 30 family members, including older adults and young children.

Before making a decision, half of study subjects were instructed to pause and practice a technique called "structured reflection," developed in Van Boven's lab, aimed at helping people be more mindful of their own values.

They asked themselves two questions contrasting how their decision would impact them personally vs. how it would impact public health. In the Thanksgiving scenario, they asked,

"How much (on a scale of 1 to 7) should your decision be influenced by the likelihood that COVID-19 may spread among family members?" And "How much should your decision be influenced by your satisfaction of spending time with family members?"

Across all countries, cultures, ages and political parties, almost everyone gave at least equal weight to others' well-being.

"That's encouraging," said Van Boven. "Our study and others suggest it is a universal human tendency that people believe they should care about how their behavior affects other people."

Those in the structured reflection group were significantly more likely to say they would cancel Thanksgiving, the study found. And the other scenarios yielded similar results, with the structured reflection group more likely to err on the side of minimizing public health risks.

Mandates only go so far

Van Boven said that such techniques could be applied to achieve a host of public health goals in which in-the-moment personal benefit, by human nature, tends to overshadow broader public health considerations.

"People know that they should not text while driving, that it's better for the planet if they take the bus instead of drive, that they should eat more vegetables and exercise, but knowing is only the first step," Van Boven said.

While campaigns often focus on changing people's minds, Van Boven's team takes a different approach: to help people be their best selves and do what they already know they should do.

As COVID-19 restrictions lift, such personal responsibility will grow increasingly important.

"In many ways, the pandemic put into stark relief the degree to which we rely on people voluntarily making decisions not only for their own betterment but also for the betterment of others," he said, noting that the moment mask mandates lifted, most shed them, regardless of how much COVID-19 was circulating. "Mandates can only go so far."

He stressed that are also critically important, so sometimes it may be worth the risk to have or attend a gathering while taking precautions like opening windows, masking or limiting group size.

The key is to take the time to weigh those risk and benefits.

"I would encourage everyone to develop a habit of asking themselves when they are considering any sort of large social gathering: What is the risk you might impose on other people and is the benefit of the gathering worth the risk?"

More information: Jairo Ramos et al, Structured reflection increases intentions to reduce other people's health risks during COVID-19, PNAS Nexus (2022). DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac218

Citation: Got the sniffles? International study examines how people make the right decision about holiday gatherings (2022, November 16) retrieved 9 December 2022 from https://medicalxpress.com/news/2022-11-sniffles-international-people-decision-holiday.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Wed, 16 Nov 2022 03:39:00 -0600 en text/html https://medicalxpress.com/news/2022-11-sniffles-international-people-decision-holiday.html
Killexams : Undergraduate study

Our updated medical curriculum enhances and improves our successful MB ChB Medicine course.

Building on areas of strength and innovation, we have updated our curriculum to ensure it is integrated, dynamic and challenging.

We develop doctors with intellectual depth, who have the flexibility, resilience and integrity to respond to the challenges of 21st century, global healthcare environments.

Why study medicine at Bristol?

Intercalated degrees

An intercalated award is an additional undergraduate degree (BSc or BA) or master's level programme that you complete in an intensive year away from your normal medical, dental or veterinary studies.

All UK and international medical, dental and vet students can intercalate onto a number of undergraduate courses at Bristol.

Industrial Placements

For visiting students

Inspiring our students

The University of Bristol is a research intensive university. INSPIRE is an initiative that helps our students become more involved in research.

Wed, 30 Nov 2022 20:55:00 -0600 en text/html https://www.bristol.ac.uk/medical-school/study/undergraduate/
PEGAPCDC80V1 exam dump and training guide direct download
Training Exams List