MB-340 test contents - Microsoft Dynamics 365 Commerce Functional Consultant Updated: 2023

Microsoft Teams has become the best video conferencing and team collaborative platform since the beginning of the pandemic. It offers a lot of great features and the share tray is one among them. You can use it to make your video conferences with your team, truly a better experience. In this guide, we show you what is Share Tray in Microsoft Teams and how you can use it.

What is Share Tray in Microsoft Teams

Share Tray in Microsoft Teams is a Share button that lets you share content in the meetings. The content could be your screen, or window, or PowerPoint, or Whiteboard, or File, etc. Microsoft named the button that lets you share as Share Tray. There is no restriction on using Share Tray. Every user in the meeting gets the option to share unless the host of your meeting restricted the option. Share Tray has the ability to make your meetings on Microsoft Teams more lively and interactive. Only thing is that you can only access Share Tray during the meetings.

To start sharing in Microsoft Teams, follow these steps:

1. While in a Teams Meeting, click on the Share button
2. You will see options like Screen, Window, etc.
3. Select what you want to share
4. Once you do that, it will be visible to all
5. To end sharing click on the button with an X mark
6. You can also use these keyboard shortcuts to start and stop sharing.

Share Tray feature is only available during the meetings. To use Share Tray, click on the Share button on the top-right of the meeting and select what you want to share from the options like Screen, Window, etc.

Whatever you select and start sharing, it will be visible to all the members or participants in the meeting.

When you are sharing something using the Share Tray, you see a small dialog box at the bottom-right of your screen with some options like mute or end meeting.

To end sharing but not meeting, you have to go to meeting screen and click on the button with an X mark on the top-right of the meeting window.

Alternatively, you can use keyboard shortcuts to start and stop sharing using the Share Tray.

To access Share Tray you can press Ctrl+Shift+Space on your keyboard. To stop sharing you can press Ctrl+Shift+E.

Read: How to send an Urgent or Important Message on Microsoft Teams.

There have been a few trends at E3 this year, most of them more or less welcome. Cartoony action, giant dragons, cops and robbers, and of course "we listened to your feedback," as a way of directly appealing to fans.

But there's a trend that's popping up in nearly every AAA game presentation at the show, one that's quickly becoming one of the more irritating memes of the video game industry.

Both Sony and Microsoft spent a good chunk of time in their own presentations turning things over to third party devs like Activision and Ubisoft to show off their games. That's fine and good, but the reason behind which games appear on which shows is the central issue.

There's a war going on right now, where through endless negotiation, big promises and cold, hard cash, both Sony and  Microsoft are extracting platform-exclusive content from the larger devs. That can mean any number of things, from first-run access to betas and content, or real in-game items like extra missions or DLC. Microsoft has deals worked out with Call of Duty, Evolve and Dragon Age. Sony has so much special content and early access for Destiny, they're treating it like a platform exclusive.

I understand that holding onto exclusive games can be expensive. Microsoft recently did so with EA/Respawn and Titanfall, and it's looking like that didn't really pan out for them, with the running theory that Titanfall 2 will absolutely be cross-platform.

But still, you can sell a console on exclusive games. You can't sell it on exclusive extra content, DLC or betas for random games that your customers can't predict.

Is there really a clear "winner" when it comes to all this extra exclusive content? In trying to buy the favor of publishers left and right, both sides have ended up with exclusive add-ons or early access to practically every upcoming AAA game. But this is not a selling point.

No one is going to start buying consoles because maybe, sometimes a AAA game will come with an extra mission or early beta access. This system acts like its buying bonuses for its players, but what it feels like is that these companies are often paying developers to simply make the experience worse on other consoles. Want that new Call of Duty map pack, PS4 owners? Well too bad, because Microsoft paid Activision a truckload of money so that you have to arbitrarily wait a month. Think that extra Far Cry mission looks cool? Well sorry, but Sony wants you to know you spent $400 on the wrong console last year, buddy.

It's certainly "fair," as these companies can spend money however they want to, and developers can carve chunks out of their games or impose artificial delays if there's a market for it, but what's it doing to consumers? It just leaves them feeling confused about how to get a "full" copy of the game they want, and annoyed when they figure out their version is "lesser" than the other one, even in small ways.

This is somewhat tied into the also-obnoxious practice of pre-order bonuses, but now between those and console exclusive content, it's becoming borderline impossible for consumers to get the true "best" version of a game. It used to be the case that you would buy a system based on its line-up of exclusives and the performance and functionality of the console itself. Now, Sony and Microsoft are trying to chip off bits and pieces of games and set traps for their competition to try and make their AAA experience better by making their opponent's worse.

Consumers cannot make decisions based on this data, but these companies are acting like they should. Okay great, Xbox One is the "best way to play" COD, Evolve and Dragon Age because it comes with exclusive, early crap, but if I'm a PlayStation fan, that's not enough to make me jump ship, and will only increase my hatred for Microsoft for paying developers to make my game seem worse than theirs. And obviously the situation works in reverse as well with Sony's Destiny/Far Cry/etc deals. Both companies have invested enough in this practice where there's no clear "victor," and everything is just a little bit worse for everyone as a result.

Attracting and holding onto talent to make exclusive games for your system is the foundation of the competitive console scene. Paying developers to delay DLC releases or create handfuls of new content so you can have bragging rights about how your console has the best version of a 5-platform release of a AAA game is just dumb and annoying.

I realize Sony and Microsoft are looking for ways to differentiate themselves from one another as their systems become increasingly like mirror images of each other, but this is the absolute lamest marketing tactic on earth, and it needs to stop before it gets any worse.

Follow me on Twitter, like my page on Facebook, and pick up a copy of my sci-fi novel, The Last Exodus, and its sequel, The Exiled Earthborn.

How does Watch Dogs stack up to Grand Theft Auto? Check out my analysis below:

Series 79, also known as the Investment Banking Representative Exam, is a Representative-Level test administered by FINRA. Anyone who passes the Series 79 test is qualified to advise on and/or facilitate debt and equity offerings, mergers and acquisitions, tender offers, financial restructurings, asset sales, divestitures (or other corporate reorganizations), and business combination transactions.

Microsoft is partnering with Tech Against Terrorism to develop an AI-powered tool for detecting terrorist or violent extremist content online.

Tech Against Terrorism⁠—an independent nonprofit organization launched by the United Nations in 2016⁠—will work with Microsoft to develop an AI-powered tool that will detect potentially harmful content for subsequent human review.

Examples uncovered by Tech Against Terrorism include a pro-Islamic State tech support group publishing a guide advising IS supporters on how to use ChatGPT without compromising operational and personal security. Another IS supporter claimed to have used an open-source AI tool to transcribe and translate a leadership message published by official IS propaganda outlets. A pro-al Qaeda propaganda outlet has been using highly likely AI-generated images as the basis for propaganda posters.

“The use of digital platforms to spread violent extremist content is an urgent issue with real-world consequences,” says Brad Smith, vice chair and president at Microsoft. “By combining Tech Against Terrorism’s capabilities with AI, we hope to help create a safer world both online and off.”

The new tool will first be used to strengthen Tech Against Terrorism’s Terrorist Content Analytics Platform, a repository of Verified and classifiable terrorist content from designated terrorist and violent extremist organizations.

The organizations will then use the TCAP to Strengthen the capabilities of Microsoft’s Azure AI Content Safety service in flagging potential terrorist content for further review. The ACS system uses next-generation multimodal models to track terrorist content across various content types, including text, images and video.

During the pilot, Tech Against Terrorism and Microsoft will first aim to establish a framework to assess the accuracy of terrorist content detection, including determining whether content is correctly flagged without perpetuating bias and whether the tool is under-detecting content or flagging false positives. If the pilot is successful, the two plan to make the tool available to smaller platforms and nonprofits.

“This joint project aims to understand and demonstrate the potential for AI technologies to transform the way we challenge complex digital safety risks while upholding human rights,” says Adam Hadley, executive director of Tech Against Terrorism and CEO of QuantSpark.

“AI systems, designed and deployed with rigorous safeguards for reliability and trustworthiness, could power a leap forward in detecting harmful content⁠—including terrorist content created by Generative AI⁠—in a nuanced, globally scalable way, enabling more effective human review of such content,” he adds.

Tech Against Terrorism says it’s archived more than 5,000 pieces of AI-generated content shared in terrorist and violent extremist spaces, and it discovers huge amounts more every year. It has, it says, identified users exploiting generative AI tools to bolster the creation and dissemination of propaganda in support of both violent Islamist and neo-Nazi ideologies.

And while such use of generative AI is currently in its infancy, it says, it’s likely to represent a threat in the medium to long term.

One emerging issue, says Tech Against Terrorism, is the undermining of hash-based detection tools, with the risk that AI-enabled variations of preexisting and new content could render these tools obsolete.

Microsoft is a founding member of the Christchurch Call to Action to Eliminate Terrorist and Violent Extremist Content Online, which recently gained new members OpenAI and Anthropic.

Microsoft has made its Azure AI Content Safety service available to the general public, marking a significant move towards boosting online safety amidst raging controversies about generative content.

This new product from the tech giant is poised to revolutionize content moderation and safety.

The newly introduced service includes robust features to detect both text and images generated by AI. Microsoft has expressed its commitment to filter out anything that qualifies as “offensive, risky, or undesirable.”

This includes a wide range of content, ranging from profanity, adult, and violent content to certain types of speech that are considered to be hateful.

By focusing on content safety, we can create a safer digital environment that promotes responsible use of AI and safeguards the well-being of individuals and society as a whole.Louise Han, product manager for Azure Anomaly Detector

Azure AI’s Comprehensive Approach Sets It Apart

The comprehensive approach of Azure AI Content Safety sets it apart from other similar tools. Microsoft has designed to address content in different categories.

Besides, it’s competent in detecting threats in different languages and can moderate both textual and visual content effectively. Microsoft defines this approach as a 360-degree safety net.

One of the notable features of this service is its use of severity metrics while moderating content in different languages. The software categorizes content on a scale from 0 to 7.

Content rated between 0 and 1 is considered appropriate for just about everyone. On the other hand, content graded between 2 and 3 falls into the low-severity category. They may contain prejudiced or opinionated views.

Content graded between 6 and 7 comes under high severity, and it includes advertisements for harmful acts.

Microsoft categorizes content graded between levels 4 and 5 as medium-severe, and they may include insulting, offensive, or intimidating language. Furthermore, they may also include attacks against specific identity groups.

Microsoft has come up with this mechanism that can filter out content advocating amplified levels of dangerous activities towards specific identity groups. Evidently, this granular approach towards content moderation enhances the level of scrutiny.

Azure AI Content Safety Uses Multi-Category Filtering

Azure AI Content Safety also banks on multi-layered filtering to zero in on harmful content across several core domains. These include self-harm, hate speech, and sexual content.

This comprehensive approach is effective in addressing different types of online content, thereby mitigating the associated risk.

Louise Han focused on the importance of considering not just human-generated content but also AI-generated content for detection.

This approach will go a long way in protecting customers from the threats of misinformation and, thereby, any potential harm, besides staying true to the ethical standards and reliability of AI innovations.

Microsoft has priced Azure AI Content Safety on a pay-as-you-go structure to ensure widespread accessibility. The Azure AI Content Safety service from Microsoft marks a significant leap to make digital content safer and more responsible for users, particularly in the wake of generative AI.