Karen Sloan reports on law firms, law schools, and the business of law. Reach her at karen.sloan@thomsonreuters.com
GMAT-Verbal certification - GMAT Section 3: Verbal Ability Updated: 2023
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
GMAT-Verbal GMAT Section 3: Verbal Ability
Test Detail:
The GMAT-Verbal section, also known as Section 3: Verbal Ability, is a component of the Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT) administered by the Admission Testing Service. The Verbal Ability section measures your skills in analyzing and understanding written material, evaluating arguments, and correcting written material to conform to standard written English. This description provides an overview of the GMAT-Verbal section.
Course Outline:
To prepare for the GMAT-Verbal section, you can consider a comprehensive course that covers the following key areas:
1. memorizing Comprehension:
- Developing memorizing skills to comprehend and analyze complex passages
- Understanding main ideas, supporting details, and logical structure
- Drawing inferences and making conclusions based on the given information
- Recognizing the author's tone, purpose, and perspective
2. Critical Reasoning:
- Evaluating arguments and identifying strengths and weaknesses
- Recognizing assumptions, evidence, and logical flaws in arguments
- Drawing logical inferences and reaching logical conclusions
- Applying critical thinking skills to analyze and evaluate written material
3. Sentence Correction:
- Identifying errors in grammar, syntax, and sentence structure
- Improving sentence clarity, conciseness, and coherence
- Applying proper usage of idioms, verb tenses, pronouns, and modifiers
- Recognizing and correcting errors in parallelism and agreement
Exam Objectives:
The GMAT-Verbal section aims to assess your verbal reasoning skills and ability to comprehend and analyze written material. The exam objectives include the following:
1. memorizing Comprehension (40% - 50%):
- Analyzing and understanding complex passages
- Answering questions based on the given memorizing material
- Identifying the main ideas, supporting details, and author's perspective
2. Critical Reasoning (30% - 40%):
- Evaluating and analyzing arguments
- Identifying assumptions, evidence, and logical flaws
- Drawing logical inferences and making conclusions
3. Sentence Correction (15% - 25%):
- Identifying and correcting errors in sentence structure and grammar
- Improving sentence clarity and coherence
- Applying proper usage of grammar rules and idiomatic expressions
Exam Syllabus:
The GMAT-Verbal section covers a range of courses within the exam objectives mentioned above. The syllabus may include the following:
- memorizing and analyzing passages from various subjects, such as social sciences, natural sciences, and business-related topics
- Questions that assess your ability to understand and interpret the content of the passages
- Critical reasoning questions that test your ability to evaluate arguments and identify logical flaws
- Sentence correction questions that focus on grammar, sentence structure, and usage of standard written English
Admission-Tests Section certification
Other Admission-Tests exams
ACT American College Testing: English, Math, Reading, Science, WritingGRE Graduate Record Examinations Full - 2023
LSAT Law School Admission Test (LSAT)
TOEFL Test Of English as a Foreign Language(Educational Testing Service)
GMAT Graduate Management Admission Test: Analytical Writing Assessment (AWA), Quantitative section, Verbal section 2023
SAT SAT ( Scholastic Aptitude Test )
MCAT Medical College Admission Test - 2023
CBEST California Basic Educational Skills Test
Praxis-Core Praxis Core Academic Skills for Educators
MAT MANAGEMENT APTITUDE TEST (MAT)
OAT Optometry Admission Test
SSAT Secondary School Admission Test
GRE-Quantitative Graduate Record Examination (Quantitative)
GRE-Verbal Graduate Record Examination (Verbal)
ASSET Short Placement Tests Developed by ACT
HESI-A2 HESI-A2
WorkKeys WorkKeys Assessment
GMAT-Verbal GMAT Section 3: Verbal Ability
LSAT-Logical-Reasoning Section One Logical Reasoning
LSAT-reading-comprehension Section Two memorizing Comprehension
GMAT-Verbal Braindumps
GMAT-Verbal Real Questions
GMAT-Verbal Practice Test
GMAT-Verbal dumps free
Admission-Tests
GMAT-Verbal
GMAT Section 3: Verbal Ability
http://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/GMAT-Verbal
Question #748
Of all the possible disasters that threaten the upcoming Olympic games, the possibility of forceful winds affecting
the rowing venue is maybe the more difficult for analysis.
A. is maybe the more difficult for analysis.
B. is probably the most difficult for analysis.
C. is maybe the most difficult for analysis.
D. is probably the more difficult for analysis.
E. is, it may be, the analysis that is most difficult.
Answer: B
The best answer is B. The sentence compares one thing, forceful winds affecting the rowing venue, to all other
possible disasters. Therefore, the superlative form, most, is required. The use of maybe is unidiomatic.
Question #749
A warrant was issued on Sunday by a New York prosecutor for the arrest of Henry Urick, until recently chairman
of the mobile telecommunications company
Telecom, including eleven other people connected with his family's business empire.
A. including eleven other people connected with his family's business empire.
B. along with eleven other people connected with his family's business empire.
C. and including eleven other people connected with his family's business empire.
D. for eleven other people connected with his family's business empire.
E. and for including eleven other people connected with his family's business empire
Answer: B
The best answer is B. The preposition for governs both Henry Urick and eleven other"¦ so along with is sufficient.
In choice A, C and E, the word including is used incorrectly because the other people were arrested in addition to
Henry Urick, and not included in his arrest
Question #750
Having seen first-hand this recipe for disaster, Roberta Henson wished to make clear that free trade is unfair and
that poor nations should be liberated from the one-size-fits-all trading model, promoted by the World Bank, the
International Monetary Fund and the World Trade Organization.
A. Roberta Henson wished to make clear that free trade is unfair and that poor nations should be liberated
from the one-size-fits-all trading model,
B. Roberta Henson wished to make clear that free trade is unfair and that poor nations should being liberated
from the one-size-fits-all trading model,
C. free trade was called unfair by Roberta Henson, who wished to make clear that poor nations should be
liberated from the one-size-fits-all trading model,
D. free trade was called unfair by Roberta Henson, who wished to make clear that poor nations should being
liberated from the one-size-fits-all trading model,
E. free trade was called unfair by Roberta Henson, who wished to clarify that poor nations should be
liberated from the one-size-fits-all trading model,
Answer: A
The best answer is A. Choices C, D and E present dangling modifiers. Choice B incorrectly places the gerund being
after the model, should.
Question #751
The exhibition of ancient Egyptian funerary art "" imposing statues, intricately painted coffins, and numerous
accoutrements, drew hundreds of people each day, equivalent to the number of visitors to last year's Impressionist
show.
A. equivalent to the number of visitors to last year's Impressionist show.
B. the equivalent of those that visited last year's Impressionist show.
C. equal to those who visited
D. as many as the visitation to
E. as many as visited
Answer: E
The best answer is E. The phrases equivalent to, the equivalent of, and equal to have too broad a range of meanings
to be used precisely here. As many as is preferable. Choice D compares the hundreds of people incorrectly to
enrollment.
Question #752
Mahatma Gandhi's is credited as having championed a nonviolent approach to reform as a practical and moral
means to struggle against social injustice.
A. as having
B. with having
C. to have
D. as the one who
E. for being the one who
Answer: B
The best answer is B. In English it is idiomatic usage to credit someone with having done something.
Question #753
Denying that one of its many irregularities had been the long-term mismanaging of company funds, the AD & M
company produced clear evidence to back its claim.
A. its many irregularities had been the long-term
B. its many irregularities has been the long-term
C. its many irregularities is the long-term
D. their many irregularities is the long-term
E. their many irregularities had been the long-term
Answer: A
The best answer is A. The singular pronoun its agrees in number with the singular noun referent AD & M; the past
perfect verb form had been is used appropriately to refer to an action completed prior to the action of the simple
past tense produced.
Question #754
Lewis and Clark were not the first white men to cross the continent from the Atlantic to the Pacific north of
Mexico, and they did not visit places not already seen and mapped by generations of native people.
A. and did not visit places not already seen and mapped by generations of native people.
B. and they did not visit places not already seen and mapped by generations of native people.
C. and they had not visit places not already seen and mapped by generations of native people.
D. nor had they visited places not already seen and mapped by generations of native people.
E. nor did they visit places not already seen and mapped by generations of native people.
Answer: E
The best answer is E. Being the second thing that Lewis and Clark did not do, the word nor is required. The first
negative phrase is in the past simple, so the second one must be in past simple form as well.
Question #755
Electric boats have eliminated the noise pollution that conventional powerboats made and reduce the loathsome
discharges of oil that foul American rivers and lakes, threatening fish and bird life.
A. reduce the loathsome discharges of oil that foul American rivers and lakes, threatening fish and bird life.
B. reduce the loathsome discharges of oil that foul American rivers and lakes, threaten fish and bird life.
C. reduce the loathsome discharges of oil that foul American rivers and lakes, to threaten fish and bird life.
D. reduced the loathsome discharges of oil that fouled American rivers and lakes, to threaten fish and bird
life.
E. reduced the loathsome discharges of oil that fouled American rivers and lakes, threatening fish and bird
life.
Answer: E
The best answer is E. The form of the word reduce is governed by first verb phrase because it continues in a
parallel construction: Have eliminated.. and reduced.
Question #756
Being literal-minded about the afterlife, both royalty and commoners arranged to fill their tombs with household
objects, each object a necessity for daily life, ready for use
A. each object a necessity for daily life, ready for use.
B. all the objects a necessity for daily life, ready for use.
C. all the objects a necessity for daily life, they are ready for use.
D. every object a necessity for daily life, it is ready for use.
E. each object a necessity for daily life, was ready for use.
Answer: A
The best answer is A. In choice A, the words object and necessity, both singular, agree.
Question #757
Among the era's triumphs were the Civil Rights Act of 1964, barring segregation in public places; the 24th
Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1964, prohibiting the poll tax; and the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which
ordered the state should abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote.
A. should abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote.
B. would abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote.
C. to abolish literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote.
D. abolishing of literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote.
E. the abolishing of literacy tests as a requirement for registering to vote
Answer: C
The infinitive to abolish follows the verb ordered, producing the grammatical and idiomatic sequence X ordered Y
to do Z.
Question #758
The Sumerians, who founded the first cities, not only invented writing, created poetry and the rule of law, and were
also extraordinary craftsmen.
A. and were also extraordinary craftsmen.
B. but were also extraordinary craftsmen.
C. but also were extraordinary craftsmen.
D. but also fashioned extraordinary crafts.
E. and also fashioned extraordinary crafts.
Answer: D
The best answer is D. Choice d correctly uses the not only"¦ but also"¦ construction, with parallel phrases.
Question #759
Government policies should ensure that network owners charge nondiscriminatory prices to any client who wants
to use their home network to distribute information.
A. who wants to use their home network to distribute information
B. who wants to be using his home network to distribute information
C. who wants to use his home network to distribute information
D. which wants to use his home network to distribute information
E. which wants to use their home network to distribute information
Answer: C
The pronoun there is inappropriate because it refers to the singular noun phrase: any client, and must be replaced
by his.
For More exams visit https://killexams.com/vendors-exam-list
Kill your exam at First Attempt....Guaranteed!
What entrance exams do you need to take to get into college? Most colleges or universities, including Saint Louis University, accept the SAT or ACT. Many, SLU included, are now test optional.
If you choose to take a college admission tests the score it can increase your eligibility for merit scholarships. Here are our answers to the most common questions about college entrance exams.
Should I Take the SAT or ACT?
While many universities will accept scores from either the SAT or ACT, some will only consider one, so start off by checking the admission requirements of the colleges that interest you. If, like at SLU, scores from both college admission exams are accepted, learn a little bit more about each test to see which is best suited to you.
Can't decide? It is becoming more common to take both the SAT and the ACT, but it is certainly not required. Consider your ability to prepare for tests while balancing your school work and other activities. It may go without saying, but you'll do best on a test you are ready to take.
Where and When Should I Take the SAT or ACT?
College admission exams are usually given early in the morning, so you might want to choose a testing site close to home so you are able to get as much sleep as possible the night before. If your high school offers college admission exam testing, consider taking your SAT or ACT there; you already know how to get there and are familiar with the building, which can take some stress out of test day.
Hint: Your local college or university might also be a test site — SLU is. And as a bonus, taking the test on campus gives you another chance to see what college life is like outside of a campus tour. Find out where you can take the ACT and where you can take the SAT.
When:
College admission exams are typically offered every few months. In order to be considered for scholarships at many colleges and universities, you'll need to apply for admission (and include your SAT or ACT test score) by Dec. 1 of your senior year.
Give yourself enough time to prepare for the test, but don't wait until the last minute in case you want to take the SAT or ACT a second time to try getting a better score. Check out the test requirements of the colleges or universities you're thinking about attending or learn about SLU's application deadlines and admission requirements.
How Should I Prepare for the ACT or SAT?
There are lots of tools to help you with ACT and SAT preparation. Check to see if your high school offers a college admission exam prep course, or talk to your parents about investing in a review course or a tutor. It might also be helpful to take practice questions like the PSAT or PACT first to see which exam suits you best or in which areas of the test you need improvement.
No matter how you decide to prepare, make sure to understand the different parts of the exams and skills they test. Both the ACT and SAT websites offer trial questions.
Are There Any Other Tests I Need to Get into College?
There might be a few extra steps for you if you currently attend high school in a country other than the U.S. Learn about SLU's admission requirements for international students.
Keep Exploring Be A Billiken
Back in 2007, I wrote a Volokh post, Should the LSAT Have A "Logic Games" Section?. arguing that the Law School Admissions Test (LSAT) should drop the logic games section because it tested abilities that didn't relate to work as a lawyer:
I confess I don't understand why the LSAT has a "games" section (aka "analytical reasoning"). This section tests an ability to understand relationships among a handful of variables and to see the different ways that different combinations of those variables can fit different criteria. The skill set seems to be keeping a lot of variables in mind and working with how a change in the boundaries of a problem changes how the different pieces can relate to each other. That is an important skill set in many professions, to be sure; it's something that I did all the time when I was in engineering graduate school. But I wonder, how important is that skill to either the study or the practice of law? What kinds of legal tasks rely heavily on that skill?
The Law School Admission Council's report on the history of different LSAT questions explains that the purpose of these questions is "to understand the structure of a relationship," and claims that they "represent the kind of detailed analyses necessary in solving legal problems."(p.8) But I don't see why. (The report cites a 1993 study, but I couldn't find it online.) It's not clear to me that this particular kind of reasoning is directly relevant to either the study or practice of law.
Some Volokh Conspiracy posts change the world immediately, while others simmer for a while. This one took sixteen years, apparently, as the people who administer the LSAT just announced the following, via Reuters:
The Law School Admission Test will ditch the so-called "logic games" section of the exam in 2024, according to the organization that creates the test, marking a major change to the exam's content.
The change means that perplexing questions such as who gets which meal at a dinner party if Mary has a fish allergy, Devin doesn't eat gluten and Jamal prefers organic will no longer be part of the test.
The Law School Admission Council (LSAC), which develops and administers the test, sent an email on Wednesday to U.S. law schools, which was reviewed by Reuters, notifying them of the change.
Seriously, glad to see this. I don't think the games section should have ever been part of the test, and it ended up a silly barrier to entry to many that only distorted the admissions process. Good riddance.
A student takes a university entrance exam in a hall of the Belgrade Fair, following the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in Belgrade, Serbia, June 30, 2020. REUTERS/Marko Djurica Acquire Licensing Rights
Oct 18 (Reuters) - The Law School Admission Test will ditch the so-called “logic games” section of the exam in 2024, according to the organization that creates the test, marking a major change to the exam's content.
The change means that perplexing questions such as who gets which meal at a dinner party if Mary has a fish allergy, Devin doesn't eat gluten and Jamal prefers organic will no longer be part of the test.
The Law School Admission Council (LSAC), which develops and administers the test, sent an email on Wednesday to U.S. law schools, which was reviewed by Reuters, notifying them of the change.
The analytical reasoning section—the formal name for logic games—will be replaced with an additional logical reasoning section in August 2024, the LSAC said.
Both the analytical reasoning and logical reasoning sections test critical thinking and deductive reasoning, but in different ways. The logical reasoning section requires LSAT takers to read a short passage then answer a question based on its content.
Logic games are viewed by many as the most difficult section of the LSAT to master. A 2016 article in The Atlantic concluded that logic games in particular fuel the LSAT test prep industry because most aspiring lawyers are unfamiliar with them. The section of online message board Reddit devoted to the LSAT is riddled with posts complaining about logic games.
"It’s tanking my potential," one Reddit user posted last month.
The elimination of logic games comes after the LSAC entered into a 2019 settlement with two blind LSAT takers who claimed the logic games violated the Americans With Disabilities Act because they could not draw the diagrams often used to complete that portion of the test. The council had four years to replace the logic games with a new analytical reasoning section under the settlement.
Because the analytical and logical reasoning sections test the same skills, it made sense to drop analytical reasoning altogether, council president Kellye Testy said in an interview Wednesday.
"This decision might help some, and it hurts none," Testy said. "The skills that we assess are the same and the scoring is the same."
In the Wednesday email to law school admissions officials, the council said removing analytical reasoning and replacing it with a second section of logical reasoning had “virtually no impact on overall scoring” based on a review of more than 218,000 exams. The revised format was also as effective as the current one in predicting first-year law school grades, the council said.
Kirstin Theis-Alvarez, dean of admissions at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law, said on Wednesday that some people may be tempted to wait until next year to take the LSAT because they think the new version will be easier.
"I've seen the data—it won't," she said.
Read more:
Law school admissions test experiments with new 'logic games' section
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
The University Testing Center is committed to providing high quality testing services for members of the University Community thereby supporting the achievement of their educational goals.
--Mission of the University Testing Center
Persons seeking admission, employment or access to programs of the University of Wyoming shall be considered without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, disability, age, veteran status, sexual orientation or political belief.
Admission and merit scholarship consideration for students who apply as test-optional is based on several factors, including high school GPA, grades in coursework required for university admission, and rigor/performance in advanced courses (AP, IB, Honors, etc.).
Consideration for students applying with a test score includes all the above plus their highest composite ACT or SAT score.
The Law School Admission Council will be dropping the ”logic games” section of the Law School Admission Test starting with the August administration.
Beginning in August, the multiple choice portion of the LSAT will consist of two Logical Reasoning (LR) sections and one memorizing Comprehension (RC) section, plus one unscored section of either LR or RC that enables us to test questions for future tests, according to LSAC’s website.
PESHAWAR: Khyber Medical University (KMU) Peshawar held the second Centralised Admission Test (KMU-CAT) for admissions to various undergraduate disciplines including Pharm D, DPT, BS Nursing, and BS Allied Health Sciences at nine centres of the province.
A total of 11,676 candidates appeared in the test, according to a press release. The result of the test will be declared within two to three days. The results can be checked on the official website of KMU.
The test was conducted for those candidates, who could not appear in the first test for any reason. In the accurate test, 5,138 students participated at two centres of Peshawar including Islamia Collegiate School and Government Higher Secondary School No.1 Peshawar City, 683 in KMU-IHS Abbottabad, 2387 in Iqra University Swat, 1,905 students participated in Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, 693 in KMU-IMS Kohat, 46 in Parachinar Kurram, 418 in Hayat Nursing College Dir Lower and 406 in Durrani Model School Bannu.
The statement said that participation of 11,676 candidates in the second test was not only an expression of confidence in KMU, but it was also expected to further Boost the merit and quality of allied health sciences. “Health is a comprehensive system in which doctors as well as various departments like pharmacy, physiotherapy, nursing and allied health sciences are of primary role and importance,” it added.
It is expected that the holding of the second centralised test for admissions to allied health sciences would on one hand provide an opportunity to talented students to come forward in these fields and on the other hand, it will also Boost the overall quality of the healthcare system in the province.
Published in Dawn, October 2nd, 2023
The University of New Haven does not require students interested in most of our academic programs to submit SAT/ACT scores. As a student-first institution that deeply cares for education to be both personal and pragmatic, the University of New Haven strives to empower students to achieve excellence and success. By having a test optional policy, we want students to determine if their SAT/ACT scores are an accurate representation of their academic ability. If they feel that their SAT/ACT scores are not, they will not be penalized during admission review if they do not submit test scores.
Do No Harm Policy
The University of New Haven has a "Do No Harm" policy regarding SAT or ACT scores when reviewing applications. We will only use your submitted SAT or ACT score results if the scores have a positive effect on your admissions decision and/or scholarship. If your SAT or ACT scores would negatively affect your chance of admission and/or scholarship, we will automatically exclude your scores during the review process.
Are there academic programs that require test scores for admission?
Yes. The University of New Haven requires students to submit SAT/ACT scores when applying to the following program:
In addition to the academic programs listed above, are there any groups of applicants that will still be required to submit standardized test scores?
- Home schooled students are still required to submit SAT or ACT scores.
- Students from countries where English is the official language are not required to submit test scores. If English is not the official language, one of the following standardized exams is required: TOEFL, IELTS, SAT or ACT. The University of New Haven School CEEB Code is 003663 and the ACT code is 0576.
- Prospective student-athletes for any of our NCAA Division II athletic teams must send scores to NCAA Eligibility Center Only (except applicants applying for Fall 2024 admission).
How does the test optional policy affect scholarships and financial aid?
Merit scholarships and need-based aid programs are available to all eligible applicants should they meet the appropriate criteria. Merit scholarship awards range from $10,000-$30,000 annually, and 97% of University of New Haven students receive some form of need-based aid.
The potential for increased scholarship opportunities are available to students who submit strong SAT/ACT scores, but all students will be evaluated for scholarships even if they do not submit SAT/ACT scores.
What is the procedure in choosing to submit or not submit my SAT/ACT scores?
When applying using the Common Application or our UNewHaven Application, there is a section that states, "Please indicate if you would like to have your SAT or ACT scores taken into consideration when your application is reviewed for admission and merit-based scholarships," you may select from the following:
- Consider my SAT and/or ACT results.
- Do not consider my SAT and/or ACT results.
GMAT-Verbal book | GMAT-Verbal exam contents | GMAT-Verbal exam success | GMAT-Verbal pdf | GMAT-Verbal availability | GMAT-Verbal mission | GMAT-Verbal testing | GMAT-Verbal information search | GMAT-Verbal Free PDF | GMAT-Verbal study tips |
Killexams exam Simulator
Killexams Questions and Answers
Killexams Exams List
Search Exams
