GE0-803 test - GCP8-System Consultant Voice Platform Updated: 2023

We’ve got a 150 page report on rebuilding the senior years of high school and the way we supply our kids some sort of certification or qualification on leaving school – but why do we even need test reform in the first place?

I think this issue is best understood through three distinct, but sometimes overlapping, concerns about our current system.

Those concerns are:

• It’s not relevant enough
• It’s not efficient enough
• It’s not accurate enough

Now, if you supply me a few minutes of your time, I’ll supply you a quick crash course in each of those problems and how they affect young people.

Relevance

This one is quite straightforward, and is often raised by people outside the education system. Basically, the test structure we used is incredibly old and, to some, entirely out of date, focused on rewarding the ability to regurgitate information in a pretty unnatural setting – it doesn’t reflect the world in which it or young people exist.

---

Exclusive | How government funding choices could damage Scottish education now and in the future

---

Obviously sometimes you just need to know things, but in a world of ubiquitous digital devices, internet connectivity and even AI, closed-book, paper-and-pen exams start to look like a bit of a relic.

The argument goes that it would, surely, be better to assess students using methods that are, themselves, relevant to the world the kids are growing up in, instead of clinging to what we’ve always done because we’ve always done it.

The test system isn’t efficient enough

This one is about the use of time over fourth, fifth and sixth year of high school.

To figure that out we need to add up, roughly, prelim periods and test periods in S4, S5 and S6. So if we say a school might spend 2 weeks on prelims, and we know that the test period lasts about six weeks, and that there is often a couple of weeks of study leave before that – that means that over the course of S4 – S6 something like 30 weeks is taken up by the test system.

And that’s just the formal stuff. You need to also factor in something much harder to pin down – the time spent not teaching a subject but rather coaching for an exam. It’s the difference between teaching a class a new poem, and then teaching them how to write a 45-minute essay on it that will tick the boxes a marker wants ticked.

Speak to high school teachers and they’ll often tell you that a lot of their time is spent on test coaching.   And that’s all time that could be spent actually teaching young people, and helping them to develop skills that are far more relevant than “here’s how to deal with the specific demands on the Higher examination paper”.

Accuracy

Are exams accurate enough for us to trust them and tie so much of young people’s futures to their performance in them?

This is generally the area that supporters of the current system camp out on. They say that while there may be problems with exams, at least they are accurate. The belief – implicit or explicit – is that you can’t trust other approaches the way you can trust an exam.

But what if that isn’t true either?

A few years ago, researchers found that, on average, 1 in 4 test grades are wrong. 1 in 4.

That was to do with the problems caused by single markers and grade boundaries, but there’s probably an easier way to understand it. Look at appeals data in Scotland.

Now usually we don’t have real appeals, just clerical checks and remarks, but last year there was a real(ish) appeals system and it saw about a third of the 60,000 appealed grades moved up because the school provided evidence showing that the test result wasn’t an accurate reflection of that student’s ability.

---

Exclusive | School pupils see test papers destroyed in Stornoway hotel fire

---

Because that’s the thing with accuracy – you need to ask what you’re being accurate about.

In a best case scenario, exams supply you an accurate assessment of a student’s performance in a 2-3 hour window – but is that actually accuracy? Is it being accurate about the thing that is actually valuable (a student’s ability and potential)? For many, the answer to that is no.

Fairness

So is it fair to assess kids using methods that lack relevance in their lives?

Is it fair to use up so much of their limited time in education on exams?

Is it fair to depend upon a system that struggles for accuracy both in a direct and a broader, more philosophical way?

And there’s what most would consider the most obvious issue of fairness: the impact of the test system on young people from deprived backgrounds.

We know that poorer pupils don’t do as well because of out of school factors, but maybe there are aspects of our system that make it worse?

And we can see that because, in 2020, when exams were cancelled and students given the grades they had actually earned – not the ones allocated to them by the grading policies of the SQA – the attainment gap at higher was cut in half.

We could be here all day getting into why but basically the issue is that we like to assume kids sit the same test at the same time under the same conditions... but they don't.

A rich kid with a full belly after plenty of sleep isn't tested under the same conditions as a poor kid who was up at 6am to get their siblings ready and didn't manage to eat breakfast before the test starts.

The test system we have now might not create unfairness, but it certainly seems to entrench and even magnify it.

That being the case, test reform doesn’t look like a luxury does it? It looks vital.

DAVENPORT, Iowa — Editor's Note: The attached video is from a previous story that aired in July.

Job seekers looking for a new opportunity in the health care industry have one more opportunity to get their foot in the door.

Genesis Health System will be hosting their final "Walk-In Wednesday" hiring event of the year on Wednesday, Oct. 26. From 3 p.m. to 6 p.m., job hunters will be able to speak with recruiters and hiring managers at Genesis' Davenport and Silvis locations. Those managers can even conduct on-the-spot job interviews for both clinical and non-clinical positions.

Officials with the health care provider said that they've hired more than 110 new employees from the hiring events since starting them in February. To learn more about the types of roles available, click here.

Watch more news, weather and sports on News 8's YouTube channel