Exam Code: CPEH-001 Practice test 2023 by Killexams.com team
Certified Professional Ethical Hacker (CPEH)
GAQM Professional test Questions
Killexams : GAQM Professional test Questions - BingNews https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/CPEH-001 Search results Killexams : GAQM Professional test Questions - BingNews https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/CPEH-001 https://killexams.com/exam_list/GAQM Killexams : Persona 4 Golden: test Answers - All School and Test Questions Answered No result found, try new keyword!At times, you'll be asked general knowledge questions during class, and every now and then, you'll need to sit through exams. Answering a question correctly will increase your Knowledge stat ... Wed, 18 Jan 2023 01:10:00 -0600 http://www.bing.com/news/apiclick.aspx?ref=FexRss&aid=&tid=63f2770b3e5846f9b08317282aaf3967&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pushsquare.com%2Fguides%2Fpersona-4-golden-exam-answers-all-school-and-test-questions-answered&c=9142052955872869577&mkt=en-us Killexams : The 5 Best Questions To Optimize Your Professional Communications

Your ability to communicate effectively is a huge career asset. It helps you connect to others, enhances your relationships, builds trust, and paves the way for career success by bridging gaps between you and your clients, colleagues, and partners.

Yet all too often, professional communications leave much to be desired. We’ve all been on the receiving end of rambling emails and muddled messages that left us wondering what the sender meant.

The next time you’re ready to hit the send button, ask yourself these five questions first to ensure your message is well-written and well-received:

1. Is it clear?

Maximize the power of your words by simplifying them. Written communication is rife with unnecessary complexity, only made worse with attempts at being cute and clever.

Clarity is the foundation for effective communication because it helps others know, like, and trust you. Without it, you’ll force others to do the difficult work of guessing your intended message. As a result, they’ll most likely get it wrong or be left scratching their heads. And when you confuse people, you’ll lose people. Swap jargon for plain language to increase the odds your message is received and understood.

2. Is it concise?

If every email you send includes a “TL;DR” (too long; didn’t read) summary, you’ve got some work to do. Meandering signals that you’re unorganized and unsure. Worse, you’ll lose your audience’s attention—and the opportunity to communicate.

When preparing a piece, be concise. It becomes unnecessarily complex when you cover too much ground in your communication. A good rule of thumb is that each piece of written communication should have one clear takeaway. This forces you to get specific about and home in on your message. When you want to deliver a message, make brevity your friend by eliminating extraneous material and getting to the point.

3. Is it compelling?

Your word choice sets the tone and elicits an emotional response, two things critical for effective communication.

Consider writing the way you speak for the most natural communication style, especially in non-technical formats. Incorporating your everyday language into your repertoire opens you up to a more descriptive, interesting lexicon that allows you to infuse a bit of personality into your writing, capturing your audience’s attention and ensuring that your message will be more memorable.

Remember, too, that how you communicate is just as important as what you communicate. Action-oriented language conveys a strong, clear tone and propels people to do something rather than remain idle—especially important when seeking a specific call to action. Where possible, minimize passive language and use active voice to add more power and intention to your words.

4. Is it intentional?

There’s a difference between a thoughtfully crafted and reactionary message. To ensure yours is the former camp, take a beat before pressing the send button to consider the purpose of your communication and its timing: is this a crucial bit of information or something else — your opinion, gossip, a knee-jerk defensive reaction, or an offhand comment you haven’t thought through? To help you further qualify it, remember the T.H.I.N.K. acronym, asking yourself if it’s True, Helpful, Inspiring, Necessary, and Kind. If it doesn’t meet most of these criteria, perhaps it’s better not to mention it. By pausing to reflect on your message, you can be more intentional with how and when to deliver it.

5. Is it written with my audience in mind?

Communication is only effective if your audience receives your intended message, so remember this golden rule of communication: it’s not about you.

Far too often, we assume that everyone communicates the same way we do, forgetting that our audiences may not live and breathe in our business world. Also, consider that even two members of the same team may require a slightly different message tailored to the individual. So, before you fire off that email, take a beat to put yourself in your audience’s shoes, consider their wants and needs, and adjust your communications accordingly.

No matter your industry or role, the ability to communicate effectively is essential for your success. And by asking yourself these five questions, you’ll optimize your professional communications.

Fri, 27 Jan 2023 10:00:00 -0600 Amy Blaschka en text/html https://www.forbes.com/sites/amyblaschka/2023/01/28/the-5-best-questions-to-optimize-your-professional-communications/
Killexams : ChatGPT passes exams from law and business schools

CNN  — 

ChatGPT is smart enough to pass prestigious graduate-level exams – though not with particularly high marks.

The powerful new AI chatbot tool recently passed law exams in four courses at the University of Minnesota and another test at University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business, according to professors at the schools.

To test how well ChatGPT could generate answers on exams for the four courses, professors at the University of Minnesota Law School recently graded the tests blindly. After completing 95 multiple choice questions and 12 essay questions, the bot performed on average at the level of a C+ student, achieving a low but passing grade in all four courses.

ChatGPT fared better during a business management course test at Wharton, where it earned a B to B- grade. In a paper detailing the performance, Christian Terwiesch, a Wharton business professor, said ChatGPT did “an amazing job” at answering basic operations management and process-analysis questions but struggled with more advanced prompts and made “surprising mistakes” with basic math.

“These mistakes can be massive in magnitude,” he wrote.

The test results come as a growing number of schools and teachers express concerns about the immediate impact of ChatGPT on students and their ability to cheat on assignments. Some educators are now moving with remarkable speed to rethink their assignments in response to ChatGPT, even as it remains unclear how widespread use is of the tool among students and how harmful it could really be to learning.

Congressman gives speech written by AI

Since it was made available in late November, ChatGPT has been used to generate original essays, stories and song lyrics in response to user prompts. It has drafted research paper abstracts that fooled some scientists. Some CEOs have even used it to write emails or do accounting work.

ChatGPT is trained on vast amounts of online data in order to generate responses to user prompts. While it has gained traction among users, it has also raised some concerns, including about inaccuracies and its potential to perpetuate biases and spread misinformation.

Jon Choi, one of the University of Minnesota law professors, told CNN the goal of the tests was to explore ChatGPT’s potential to assist lawyers in their practice and to help students in exams, whether or not it’s permitted by their professors, because the questions often mimic the writing lawyers do in real life.

“ChatGPT struggled with the most classic components of law school exams, such as spotting potential legal issues and deep analysis applying legal rules to the facts of a case,” Choi said. “But ChatGPT could be very helpful at producing a first draft that a student could then refine.”

He argues human-AI collaboration is the most promising use case for ChatGPT and similar technology.

“My strong hunch is that AI assistants will become standard tools for lawyers in the near future, and law schools should prepare their students for that eventuality,” he said. “Of course, if law professors want to continue to test simple recall of legal rules and doctrines, they’ll need to put restrictions in place like banning the internet during exams to enforce that.”

Likewise, Wharton’s Terwiesch found the chatbot was “remarkably good” at modifying its answers in response to human hints, such as reworking answers after pointing out an error, suggesting the potential for people to work together with AI.

Scott Galloway on the 'scarier part' of AI tools like ChatGPT

In the short-term, however, discomfort remains with whether and how students should use ChatGPT. Public schools in New York City and Seattle, for example, have already banned students and teachers from using ChatGPT on the district’s networks and devices.

Considering ChatGPT performed above average on his exam, Terwiesch told CNN he agrees restrictions should be put in place for students while they’re taking tests.

“Bans are needed,” he said. “After all, when you deliver a medical doctor a degree, you want them to know medicine, not how to use a bot. The same holds for other skill certification, including law and business.”

But Terwiesch believes this technology still ultimately has a place in the classroom. “If all we end up with is the same educational system as before, we have wasted an amazing opportunity that comes with ChatGPT,” he said.

Thu, 26 Jan 2023 15:16:00 -0600 en text/html https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/26/tech/chatgpt-passes-exams/index.html
Killexams : Retirees Must Ask These Questions Before Hiring A Financial Professional

To help protect themselves from being taken advantage of by financial sales professionals, retirees should ask the following questions about the financial professional seeking to provide them with investment advice or sell them an investment product:

“Are you a fiduciary, and how are you registered?”

“This question is critical as advisors can be dually registered and operate as a broker AND a fiduciary, though they’ll still tell you they’re a fiduciary,” says Eric Presogna, Owner and CEO at One-Up Financial in Erie, Pennsylvania.

For over two decades now, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has allowed brokers to register as Investment Advisers and provide both types of services. Prospective clients often find this dual capacity confusing, but the difference is significant. SEC-Registered Investment Advisers must act in a fiduciary capacity, while brokers are under no similar obligation. Why is this distinction important?

“Advisors who possess a fiduciary duty to their clients are required to put their clients’ best interests above their own at all times,” says David Rosenstrock, Director and Founder of Wharton Wealth Planning in New York City. “Many people are surprised to find out that this obligation isn’t required of all advisors. In fact, most advisors aren’t required to act as a fiduciary in all their interactions with a client. Advisors who are not fiduciaries often follow the suitability standard, but that only requires that they deliver clients advice deemed ‘suitable’ for their situations; thus, it offers fewer protections/safeguards to clients. The term fiduciary is still not widely known and understood.”

If you’re not sure what “fiduciary” really means and it’s not clear what type of professional service your potential service provider plans to offer, there are other paths for you to take to make sure the provider is legally required to always act in your best interest. To determine this, you’ll need to dig a little deeper into the person’s certifications and licenses.

“Some red flags that an advisor doesn’t always act as a fiduciary include a Series 7 license and a Series 63 or 66 license,” says Rosenstrock. “If a financial advisor has a Series 7 license, that individual is allowed to collect commissions from the sale of investments, which means that professional doesn’t always act in a fiduciary capacity. A Series 63 or 66 is another license that a financial advisor needs to collect commissions on product sales.”

“How long have you been doing this, and what are your qualifications?”

Many advisors rely on word-of-mouth advertising because it entails an endorsement from the referrer. While this may sound ideal, it doesn’t mean you shouldn’t do your own due diligence. After all, just because someone is friendly doesn’t make that person competent.

“It is important for a retiree to understand the professional background and qualifications of the financial professional seeking to sell them an investment product,” says Garett Polanco, CIO at Independent Equity in Fort Worth, Texas. “This can help the retiree determine whether the professional is knowledgeable and competent in the field and whether they can be trusted to provide sound financial advice.”

If the professional is a Registered Investment Adviser, you can do your own research on the individual or the firm by going to the SEC’s website. For brokers, you’ll need to go to a different website.

“If the advisor is a broker, check the broker’s credentials at FINRA’s Broker Check website,” says Coconut Creek-based financial author Craig Kirsner. “Also, look at the broker’s website and search for the broker online. Does the broker seem to have a good reputation? If there are a lot of people with the same name as the broker, use quotation marks around the name to limit the search. Check the broker out with the Better Business Bureau. Also, go to the broker’s Google Maps location and see what the reviews are there.”

“Where will my money be held?”

Bernie Madoff got away with his scheme for so long because he not only invested the assets but he provided all the reporting on those assets. To maximize your safety, you’d prefer to have the custodian that holds your assets be a different firm, independent of the advisor's firm.

“You should ask where the money will be held,” says Kirsner. “Make sure it’s held at a reputable firm or large, highly rated company. Make sure you will have access to see your funds at this firm and only write the check payable to that firm.”

“How do you get paid, and are there other costs I will be paying?”

Speaking of writing checks, never sign the dotted line until you know not only what the advisor is getting paid but what your out-of-pocket fees are for any products that the advisor may place you in. (Note: products can include mutual funds, insurance contracts, and anything other than stocks and bonds.)

“It is important for you to understand the costs involved in any investment product, including fees and commissions,” says Polanco. “This can help you determine whether the product is a good value and whether it aligns with your financial goals.”

Don’t be misled about mutual fund expense ratios. These are not out-of-pocket expenses and are already incorporated into the return data you see from the mutual fund company. It’s similar to a stock return which already includes the operating costs of that company. What matters are the transaction costs and holding fees, which are not part of the operating costs or expense ratio. These can add up and place more pressure on the performance of your investments.

“Most of the issues are related to cost, which creates a high hurdle rate for the underlying investments to clear before the investor makes decent money,” says Stephen Taddie, Partner at HoyleCohen, LLC in Phoenix. “By that I mean, if the cost of the product is 3% annually, the underlying investments need to make 7.50% for the investor to net 4.50%, which by comparison is currently available from a 10-year U.S. treasury bond. If the product is touted as being able to produce a 6-8% rate of return, then underlying investments need to produce 9-10% for that to happen. The follow-up questions with regard to investments would be focused on understanding how the investments will earn that rate in this environment. Often, the risk taken within the product is more than you would take on your own in individual securities.”

“What is your investment philosophy?”

Finally, and to continue the line of reasoning implied by Taddie, you need to explore the particular investment style practiced by the advisor you’re considering.

“Your adviser should go through all the key components of financial advice, such as how, when, where, and why to invest in what,” says Bruce Mohr, Senior Investment Advisor and Credit Consultant at Fair Credit in Decatur, Georgia. “A good investment strategy and a track record of sound investment management are requirements for a financial advisor. Your overall financial health depends heavily on your investments, so you should deal with an advisor who employs strategies you are at ease with. They should be able to properly describe their investment philosophy, plan, and guiding principles utilizing an evidence-based approach. For instance, I believe that diversification is important and that investing in the long term is best.”

If you invest in products instead of individual stocks and bonds, you’ll also want to make sure there are no restrictions, surrender fees, etc. or other repercussions should you decide to end the relationship with the advisor and liquidate the investments that the advisor has placed you in.

Thu, 26 Jan 2023 10:01:00 -0600 Chris Carosa en text/html https://www.forbes.com/sites/chriscarosa/2023/01/27/retirees-must-ask-these-questions-before-hiring-a-financial-professional/
Killexams : ChatGPT bot passes law school exam

ChatGPT: Grading artificial intelligence's writing

ChatGPT: Grading artificial intelligence's writing 08:02

A chatbot powered by reams of data from the internet has passed exams at a U.S. law school after writing essays on subjects ranging from constitutional law to taxation and torts.

ChatGPT, from OpenAI - a U.S. company that this week got a massive injection of cash from Microsoft - uses artificial intelligence (AI) to generate streams of text from simple prompts.

The results have been so good that educators have warned it could lead to widespread cheating and even signal the end of traditional classroom teaching methods.

Jonathan Choi, a professor at Minnesota University Law School, gave ChatGPT the same test faced by students, consisting of 95 multiple-choice questions and 12 essay questions.

Explainer AI Writing Tool ChatGPT
A ChatGPT prompt is shown on a device. Peter Morgan / AP

In a white paper titled "ChatGPT goes to law school" published on Monday, he and his coauthors reported that the bot scored a C+ overall.

While this was enough for a pass, the bot was near the bottom of the class in most subjects and "bombed" at multiple-choice questions involving mathematics.

"In writing essays, ChatGPT displayed a strong grasp of basic legal rules and had consistently solid organization and composition," the authors wrote.

But the bot "often struggled to spot issues when given an open-ended prompt, a core skill on law school exams."

Officials in New York and other jurisdictions have banned the use of ChatGPT in schools, but Choi suggested it could be a valuable teaching aide.

"Overall, ChatGPT wasn't a great law student acting alone," he wrote on Twitter.

"But we expect that collaborating with humans, language models like ChatGPT would be very useful to law students taking exams and to practicing lawyers."

And playing down the possibility of cheating, he wrote in reply to another Twitter user that two out of three markers had spotted the bot-written paper.

"(They) had a hunch and their hunch was right, because ChatGPT had perfect grammar and was somewhat repetitive," Choi wrote. 

Tue, 24 Jan 2023 17:22:00 -0600 en-US text/html https://www.cbsnews.com/news/chatgpt-bot-passes-law-school-exam/
Killexams : New York Regents test blasted for ‘loaded’ questions about Israel

A Regents test administered to thousands of New York students last week was blasted by critics as “unconscionable and shameful” for including “loaded” questions about Israel.

A group of Jewish leaders and civic organizations ripped a section of the test that showed maps of the changes to Israel’s borders over the decades and asked two questions that gave a “dishonest” impression about the Jewish state’s expansion.

“The maps lack all context,” former state Assemblyman Dov Hikind said. “Specifically that border changes were the result of successive wars started by Arab states to annihilate Israel. Second, the questions, at best, lend themselves to debate, not to singular answers from among false choices.”

Hikind also said that the Global History and Geography Regents II, given last Thursday, included the trope that the Holocaust was the prevailing reason for the state of Israel and that “Zionists and Jewish immigrants” benefited most from the “changing borders.”

“When you show these maps, and ask why the state of Israel was created, it just attributes it to the Holocaust,” said Hikind who added that the Zionist movement toward the Jewish state actually began in the 19th century under Theodor Herzl.

Dov Hikind at a rally this morning in fron of the court.
Hikind, a former state assemblyman, said the maps on the Regents lack context.
Steven Hirsch

He also complained that the test referred to the Golan Heights region, which was recognized by the US in 2019, as being “annexed” by Israel.

The questions shocked proctors charged with administering the test, he said.

“One proctor was so angry, she was beside herself,” Hikind told The Post. 

Hikind, along with Brooklyn Councilwoman Inna Vernikov and the group Americans Against Antisemitism, are calling on New York State Commissioner of Education Betty Rosa “to swiftly remove the disingenuous questions and conduct a thorough audit to ensure such egregious distortions of history that invariably lead to animosity for the sole Jewish state aren’t being inadvertently fed to our children.”

pic of the test
A picture of the test, and questions, on the Regents test.

One of the controversial questions asked, “Which historical event most directly influenced the development of the 1947 plan shown on map A (and showed a map of Israel from 1947).” The possible answers were 1) Russian pogroms, 2) the fall of the Austro-Hungarian Empire 3) Paris Peace Conference 4) the Holocaust, with 4 being the right answer.

The other asked, “Which group benefited most from the changes shown on the maps?” The right answer, according to the test, was “Zionists and Jewish Immigrants.”

“Test transparency can raise legitimate issues of questions’ appropriateness and wording,” said David Bloomfield, education professor at  Brooklyn College and the CUNY Graduate Center. “It’s not a matter of ‘wokeness’ to civilly debate these matters.”

Hikind said that by reducing the creation of the Jewish state to the Holocaust ignores all historical, ancestral and biblical connections of the Jewish people to the land of Israel. “That connection goes back thousands of years.”

This isn’t the first time the Regents has had an Israel problem. 

In 2017, an “anti-Israel” cartoon blasted as “anti-Israel propaganda” was discovered on the Global Studies Regents.

Inna Vernikov, (pictured) a candidate for City Council in District #48, is running against Steve Saperstein.
Vernikov also called out the New York State Commissioner of Education Betty Rosa.
Gregory P. Mango

The New York State Education Department said the two questions on Israel were “designed to test students’ knowledge of geography as it relates to historical events.”

“New York State social studies teachers prepared, selected, and reviewed the excerpt and questions on the Global History Regents test prior to their inclusion,” they added. “All test questions are reviewed multiple times by NYS-certified teachers and State Education Department subject matter and testing specialists to ensure they are not biased, accurately measure the learning standards, and contain no errors.”

Tue, 31 Jan 2023 05:15:00 -0600 en-US text/html https://nypost.com/2023/01/31/new-york-regents-exam-blasted-for-loaded-questions-about-israel/
Killexams : NY Education Commissioner under fire over 'egregious distortions of history' in test questions about Israel

Jewish groups and leaders are up in arms after a New York State Regents test included two questions about Israel that they believe oversimplifies and distorts history.

According to the New York Post, the questions on the Global History and Geography Regents II test were preceded by images of maps of the land showing the 1947 United Nations Partition Plan for dividing the land into separate states for Jews and Arabs, how the land was divided in 1949 in the aftermath of the war between Israel and Arab nations, and how areas of the land were controlled as of 2017.

One question, referencing the 1947 map, asked which event most influenced the development of the UN Partition Plan, offering the choices of Russian pogroms, the fall of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, the Paris Peace Plan, and the Holocaust. According to the Post, the intended answer was the Holocaust.

The next question asks who benefited the most from the maps' changes over time, with the correct answer reportedly being intended as "Zionists and Jewish Immigrants." among choices that also included the government of Jordan, Palestinian nationalists, and citizens of Lebanon.


New York education officials are under fire after a standardized test included controversial questions about Israeli history (John Paraskevas/Newsday RM via Getty Images)

"The maps lack all context," Democratic former state Assemblyman Dov Hikind told the Post. "Specifically that border changes were the result of successive wars started by Arab states to annihilate Israel. Second, the questions, at best, lend themselves to debate, not to singular answers from among false choices."

Hikind also pointed out the problem with attributing the creation of the state of Israel to the Holocaust, noting that the modern Zionist movement had been pushing for a Jewish home in that land since the 19th century.

Even those administering the test were upset by the questions, Hikind told the Post.

"One proctor was so angry, she was beside herself," he said.

The Department of Education told the Post in a statement that the test questions had been "designed to test students’ knowledge of geography as it relates to historical events."


New York Education Commissioner Betty Rosa is facing a push to remove questions from a standardized test that critics say distort Israeli and Jewish history.

The department's statement, rather than address the distress the questions caused, appeared to defend the reasoning behind them, making clear that there were no unintentional acts on their part.

"New York State social studies teachers prepared, selected, and reviewed the excerpt and questions on the Global History Regents test prior to their inclusion," the statement said. "All test questions are reviewed multiple times by NYS-certified teachers and State Education Department subject matter and testing specialists to ensure they are not biased, accurately measure the learning standards, and contain no errors.


According to the Post, Hikind, City Councilwoman Inna Vernikov, and the group Americans Against Antisemitism are urging Commissioner of Education Betty Rosa "to swiftly remove the disingenuous questions and conduct a thorough audit to ensure such egregious distortions of history that invariably lead to animosity for the sole Jewish state aren’t being inadvertently fed to our children."

Fox News Digital reached out to Vernikov's office for comment they did not immediately respond.

Wed, 01 Feb 2023 12:42:00 -0600 Fox News en text/html https://www.foxnews.com/us/ny-education-commissioner-under-fire-egregious-distortions-history-exam-questions-israel
Killexams : House GOP demands probe into ‘antisemitic’ New York test question's 'revision' of history on Israel

FIRST ON FOX – All but two members of the House GOP delegation from New York are demanding an investigation into a statewide standardized test question Jewish leaders consider antisemitic. The Republican congresspersons say the question reflects a "far-left anti-Israel ideology" permeating the public school system pushing "ideological revisions" of history. 

In a letter to Democratic New York Gov. Kathy Hochul and New York State Education Department Commissioner Betty Rosa, Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., leads eight fellow Republican House members from New York state in expressing "grave concern with the abhorrent, antisemitic question included in this winter’s NYS Regents test in Global History and Geography." 

The question asks who benefited the most from changes shown on maps of Israel and surrounding areas from 1947 to 2017. The options were: Zionists and Jewish immigrants; the government of Jordan; Palestinian nationalists; or the citizens of Lebanon.

"It is simply beyond comprehension that anyone at the New York State Education Department would approve a question on a statewide test that blatantly promotes hateful anti-Jewish and anti-Israel rhetoric which only fan the flames of antisemitism in our schools," the letter says. "For centuries, the State of Israel, one of our Nation’s greatest allies, and Jews have fought for their right to exist. This question attempts to cast doubt on that very notion and rewrite history by erasing the struggle for independence that the State of Israel faced." 


Rep. Mike Lawler, R-NY, speaks with reporters during orientation meeting in the U.S. Capitol Building on Nov. 14, 2022 in Washington, DC.  (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

The letter cites an "unprecedented surge" of antisemitism across the nation. 

In November 2022, New York City alone saw a 125% increase in antisemitic hate crimes compared to the same period the year before. 

"This question is just the latest instance of the anti-Israel and antisemitic ideologies that are infiltrating our schools and communities," the nine Republican members of Congress assert. "Moreover, it indicates a complete lack of oversight in the approvals process at the New York State Education Department."

In addition to Lawler, the letter was signed by Reps. Nick Langworthy, Anthony D’Esposito, Claudia Tenney, Nick LaLota, Marcus J. Molinaro, Elise Stefanik, Brandon Williams and Andrew R. Garbarino. The only Republican House members from New York not to sign on were Reps. Nicole Malliotakis and George Santos. 

Santos, the subject of a House Ethics probe into alleged campaign finance law violations, has rebuffed calls to resign even from members of his own party after lying about descending from survivors of the Holocaust, having a college degree and having had a successful career at two Wall Street firms while running for office. 

A photo of a controversial question on the 2022 winter’s NYS Regents test in Global History and Geography asking who benefited the most from changes shown on maps of Israel and surrounding areas from 1947 to 2017. (Rep. Mike Lawler's congressional office)

The letter also cites the exact passage of Bill A.472, which required the New York State Education Department to examine whether schools across the state were adequately teaching about the horrors of the Holocaust. 

"This question indicates that even the state’s own education department isn’t following this new law," the letter asserts. 

"We are calling on you to launch an immediate investigation into this attack on New York’s Jewish community. There must be a thorough examination into this abject failure and the
individuals responsible must be held accountable. This type of anti-Jewish sentiment needs to be singularly and unequivocally condemned," the letter says. "We respectfully request an investigation into this matter to hold those responsible accountable for this heinous, antisemitic question that appeared on a statewide exam." 

"How someone could have signed off on this, a question that seemingly calls into question the very right for Israel to exist, is beyond absurd," Lawler said in a statement to Fox News Digital. "It is imperative that we take on antisemitism wherever it attempts to take root and a thorough investigation into this matter should help prevent a question of this nature from ever appearing on a state Regents test again."

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul gives a speech on the Hudson River tunnel project at the West Side Yard on Jan. 31, 2023 in New York City.  (Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

"Antisemitism in any form is vile, unacceptable, and I condemn it in the strongest way possible. New York students should be learning and tested on real history, not ideological revisions. I urge Governor Hochul and Commissioner Rosa to act in the best interest of our students," LaLota said. 

"It defies comprehension how such a blatant antisemitic question passed through the layers of approval process in our state’s education system, but unfortunately, it’s a reflection of the far-left anti-Israel ideology that is permeating our government," Langworthy said. 

In a statement to Fox News Digital, a spokesperson for the New York State Department of Education said: "A diverse group of New York State social studies teachers prepared, selected, and reviewed the excerpt and questions on the Global History Regents test prior to their inclusion. All test questions are reviewed multiple times by NYS-certified teachers and State Education Department subject matter and testing specialists to ensure they are not biased and accurately measure the learning standards. The questions were designed to test students’ knowledge of geography as it relates to historical events surrounding the creation of the State of Israel, including the impact of the Holocaust on migration to Israel." 


"As per standard practice, these questions will not be used on future exams," the statement added. "The Department will continue to work with educators and stakeholders across New York to advance equitable access to opportunity while keeping the lessons and atrocities of the past, such as the Holocaust, as testament to the work we must do together to build a better future for all students."

Fox News Digital also reached out to Hochul's office for comment Thursday. 

Wed, 01 Feb 2023 23:26:00 -0600 Fox News en text/html https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-gop-demands-probe-antisemitic-new-york-exam-questions-revision-history-israel
Killexams : SanDisk Professional Pro-Blade review: Fast, but an answer to a question nobody is asking

SanDisk Professional Pro-Blade Transport and SSD Mag

AppleInsider may earn an affiliate commission on purchases made through links on our site.

SanDisk Professional's Pro-Blade SSD is a modular storage system that has good enough speed, and is reasonably compact, but it needs time to evolve and see greater adoption.

Most of the AppleInsider staff used Zip disks in their heyday. For those that didn't, they were portable magnetic media a bit larger than a floppy disk that slotted into a relatively inexpensive drive.

Most of the major manufacturers adopted them as at least an option. Apple did too.

But for many reasons, they faded into obscurity. Data density was one issue, and so was reliability on not just it, but its larger cousin, the Jaz drive. And, they were mostly replaced with flash drives.

Fast forward about two decades to today, and SanDisk has resurrected the idea of removable media in a custom enclosure with the idea of the flash drive, resulting in the SanDisk Professional Pro-Blade Transport system. The Pro-Blade ecosystem revolves around high-speed SSD "Mags," which are slimline and lightweight, and hold the genuine media.

To interface them with your Mac, you at a minimum need the SanDisk Pro-Blade Transport. That enclosure is effectively the main enclosure for an external drive, but without the drive itself.

The theory is that you have one or relatively few Transports, but lots of SSD Mags. Tried and true model, once upon a time.

Pro-Blade Transport

Of the two types of component, the Transport is the bit that connects to your Mac. The SSD Mag fits into the Transport, which in turn communicates to the Mac.

In effect, the Transport is a specialized hard drive docking station or "toaster." Except it's in a much smaller form.

The slot of the Pro-Blade Transport where you place the SSD Mags

Made from aluminum complete with an aluminum heatsink to help cool the SSD Mags, the Transport is a relatively straightforward docking element. On one end is the slot where the SSD Mag fits in, along with an indicator light.

The slot is made so that you can easily insert and pull out the SSD Mag, so that you can quickly switch between Mags without too much interference.

At the other end is just one port, a USB-C 3.2 Gen 2x2 connection with up to 20Gbps of bandwidth available to use. That is, assuming your Mac supports it — more on this in a bit.

There's a 20Gbps USB-C port to connect the Pro-Blade Transport to your Mac.

As an enclosure, it's also reasonably sized at 5.13 inches long, 2.82 inches wide, and 0.63 inches thick. It's fairly lightweight when empty at 0.46 pounds. This is still much bigger than the exact crop of NVMe USB-C enclosures.

It can be used on both Macs and Windows, with support for macOS 10.13 or later and Windows 10, though you will have to reformat the Mags. For the former, it is compatible with Time Machine, though admittedly this is better suited for work-use drives rather than backups.

Pro-Blade SSD Mags

The genuine storage bit of the system, the SSD Mags are long, thin slabs of aluminum with SanDisk branding in the middle. At one end is a divot to help grip the Mag when it's in the slot.

The other end has the connector that couples to its counterpart deep inside the Transport. It will also work with the Pro-Blade Station, a more enhanced form of the Transport that can take up to four Mags.

However, this isn't a standard connector that will work outside of the system itself. You cannot directly connect the drive alone to your Mac, you must use the Transport.

Each Mag is very light at a tenth of a pound each. They're not quite as long at 4.32 inches, but they're also a lot thinner and narrower at 1.1 inches and 0.2 inches.

Despite their size, SanDisk worked to make each one durable. Away from the Transport, each blade can withstand a 3-meter (9.8ft) drop, and can survive being crushed by a 4,000-pound weight.

We did run one over with our minivan, and it survived, intact and readable. Scuffed, but intact.

So far, there are four different capacities of Pro-Blade SSD Mag available, including 1TB, 2TB, and 4TB versions, and all using NVMe storage

Assisted by the aluminum enclosure and the heatsink in the Transport, the SSD Mag is capable of read speeds of up to 2,000 megabytes per second.

Our testing bore this out. Read speeds on a M2 Max MacBook Pro routinely hit 1.92 gigabytes per second, and read speeds generally hovered at 1.86 gigabytes per second. We didn't see a significant decrease in speed over time.

After we had some questions about it, we tested on a M1 Max MacBook Pro. On those units USB-C connections are limited to 10 gigabits per second, versus the 20 that USB 3.2 2x2 provides, and 40, that Thunderbolt is capable of.

On the M1 Mac, we only got about a gigabyte per second read and write, half that on the new MacBook Pro.

Curious, we ripped one apart. The enclosure is held together with a trio of T5 screws, and a pile of thermal compound connecting the drive and the enclosure. Inside the 2TB capacity Mag is a tiny bridge board with a Mag connector, and a Western Digital SN750 NVMe SSD with 2GB of cache.

In theory, that drive could push over 3 gigabytes per second, and did when we moved it to a Thunderbolt enclosure. But, it can only push this much data for about 12GB of transfer. After that, speeds in the Thunderbolt enclosure dropped to about 1.6 gigabytes per second.

So, with that 20 gigabit USB-C connection on new machines, and certainly the 10 gigabit connection on M1 and older Macs, you are assured of steady-state performance at the claimed speeds.

A space-saving solution for professional users

SanDisk provided us two carriers and a few Mags for testing. We didn't get to test out the four-Mag $499 Pro-Blade Station, as it does not appear to ship until March.

For the average user, the SanDisk Professional Pro-Blade modular storage system is overkill. Even Mac power users will have quite some trouble justifying this sort of purchase, and it's not because of the price.

Buying each Mag individually costs $179.99 for 1TB, $299.99 for 2TB, and $599.99 for 4TB, which is fairly reasonable when compared with the general NVMe market. The Transport costs $69.99 on its own, which is pretty good for a storage-free component.

There are bundles available of the Transport with each SSD Mag capacity, starting at $239.99 for 1TB then rising to $349.99 for 2TB and $579.99 for 4TB.

SanDisk Professional's Pro-Blade system is great for creative fields.

The nosebleed pricing of NVMe is justified by its blisteringly fast performance, which is reasonable on its own, especially if you have the need for it. It's more than enough for almost anyone to be able to work directly from the external drive without any real issues.

The problematic bit is that this is a modular storage system with an extremely specific set of purposes in mind. It's to cut down the overall size of external storage if you need to use mountains of drives, and it's to make it as easy as possible to switch between physical drives.

The average user and even the "prosumer" has other, better options. However, videographers and the like working from the drive directly and using each one per project can then physically hand over to someone else, which is good from a flexibility standpoint. And, they're easy to store and label.

For that purpose, the SanDisk Professional Pro-Blade Transport and SSD Mags are a useful tool for data storage involving multiple drives. For other users, more traditional external storage drives are a better and more cost-effective than Mags and Transports.

Looking to the future, though, is where the Pro-Blade has potential. The Pro-Blade Station is a good start, with Thunderbolt connectivity.

If peripherals like the Pro Blade or some kind of Thunderbolt dock incorporating the Mags, with more ports and monitor connectivity becomes more ubiquitous, paired with adoption in devices that demand high speeds like video cameras, then we see a bright future for the technology.

Until then, though, we're not sure who's asking for this solution today, and there are better solutions for the M1 series of Macs. We'll revisit this in the future.

SanDisk Pro-Blade Transport Pros

  • High-speed transfers
  • Quick switching between Mags
  • Compact size considering the use of multiple drives
  • Premium aluminum styling
  • Great for video editors

SanDisk Pro-Blade Transport Cons

  • Overkill and too costly for most users
  • Not full 20 gbit/sec speed on anything but the latest 2023 MacBook Pro
  • Non-standard connector limits use of SSD Mags outside of the ecosystem

Rating: 3 out of 5

Where to buy

Get the SanDisk Pro-Blade Transport with a 1TB SSD for $169.99, including a limited-time $70 discount. That reduced price is available from B&H or Amazon at the time of this publication.

Updated February 15, 2:05 PM ET Updated with speed testing on a M1 Max MacBook Pro, versus the testing performed solely on a M2 Max MacBook Pro.

Thu, 16 Feb 2023 23:34:00 -0600 en text/html https://appleinsider.com/articles/23/02/15/sandisk-professional-pro-blade-system-fast-but-an-answer-to-a-question-nobody-is-asking
Killexams : Persona 5 Royal: test Answers - All School and Test Questions Answered No result found, try new keyword!Looking for all the test and school questions answers in Persona 5 Royal? Well you've come to the right place. Going to school is an important part of your life in Persona 5, and being put on the ... Wed, 18 Jan 2023 00:32:00 -0600 en text/html https://appleinsider.com/articles/23/02/15/sandisk-professional-pro-blade-system-fast-but-an-answer-to-a-question-nobody-is-asking
CPEH-001 exam dump and training guide direct download
Training Exams List