CFE-FT-FS CFE Financial Transactions and Fraud Schemes Certified Fraud Examiner test |

CFE-FT-FS test - CFE Financial Transactions and Fraud Schemes Certified Fraud Examiner Updated: 2023

Kill your CFE-FT-FS test at first try with CFE-FT-FS dumps questions
Exam Code: CFE-FT-FS CFE Financial Transactions and Fraud Schemes Certified Fraud Examiner test June 2023 by team
CFE Financial Transactions and Fraud Schemes Certified Fraud Examiner
ACFE Transactions test

Other ACFE exams

CFEX Certified Fraud Examiner (CFEX)
CFE-FP-D Fraud Prevention and Deterrence
CFE-FT-FS CFE Financial Transactions and Fraud Schemes Certified Fraud Examiner
CFE-INVESTIGATIONS CFE Investigation Certified Fraud Examiner CFE-FT-FS test braindumps offers all of you that you need to take CFE-FT-FS certification exam. Our CFE-FT-FS CFE-FT-FS test will provide you with braindumps of test questions with confirmed answers that replicate the real exam. We at are made plans to empower you to pass your CFE-FT-FS test with excessive ratings.
CFE-FT-FS Braindumps
CFE-FT-FS Real Questions
CFE-FT-FS Practice Test
CFE-FT-FS dumps free
CFE Financial Transactions and Fraud Schemes Certified
Fraud Examiner
Question: 54
Employees with the authority to grant discounts in order to skim revenues may use which authority?
A . False discounts
B . Recording a discount on sale procedure
C . Internal discount sales audits
D . None of the above
Answer: A
Question: 55
Which of the following method is NOT used to detect conflicts of interest?
A . Tips & Complaints
B . Review of vendor ownership files
C . Underbillings of assets
D . Interviews with purchasing personnel
Answer: C
Question: 56
The behavior profile of employees who are involved in bribery schemes may include:
A . Gambling habit
B . Extravagant lifestyle
C . Drug and/or alcohol addiction
D . All of the above
Answer: D
Question: 57
How many accounts are affected in fraudulent accounting entries and therefore same
number of categories on the financial statement?
A . One
B . At least two
C . More than two
D . None of above
Answer: A
Question: 58
If the assets are intentionally purchased by the company but simply misappropriated by the fraudster, this is referring to
A . Inventory larceny scheme
B . Asset receiving scheme
C . Fraudulent purchase
D . Falsify shipping
Answer: A
Question: 59
The act of an official or fiduciary person who unlawfully and wrongfully uses his station or character to procure some
benefit, contrary to duty and rights of others is called:
A . Conflict of interest
B . Corruption
C . Bribery
D . Overbilling
Answer: B
Question: 60
Verify supporting documentation on outstanding checks written for a material amount is a test used to conduct for:
A . Check disbursement
B . Bank confirmation
C . Bank confirmation
D . Cut-off statements
Answer: C
For More exams visit
Kill your test at First Attempt....Guaranteed!

ACFE Transactions test - BingNews Search results ACFE Transactions test - BingNews Inside Russia's cyber gulag


When Yekaterina Maksimova can't afford to be late, the journalist and activist avoids taking the Moscow subway, even though it's probably the most efficient route.

That's because she's been detained five times in the past year, thanks to the system's pervasive security cameras with facial recognition. She says police would tell her the cameras "reacted" to her — although they often seemed not to understand why, and would let her go after a few hours.

"It seems like I'm in some kind of a database," says Maksimova, who was previously arrested twice: in 2019 after taking part in a demonstration in Moscow and in 2020 over her environmental activism.

For many Russians like her, it has become increasingly hard to evade the scrutiny of the authorities, with the government actively monitoring social media accounts and using surveillance cameras against activists.

Rights advocates say that Russia under President Vladimir Putin has harnessed digital technology to track, censor and control the population, building what some call a "cyber gulag" — a dark reference to the labor camps that held political prisoners in Soviet times.

It's new territory, even for a nation with a long history of spying on its citizens.

"The Kremlin has indeed become the beneficiary of digitalization and is using all opportunities for state propaganda, for surveilling people, for de-anonymizing internet users," said Sarkis Darbinyan, head of legal practice at Roskomsvoboda, a Russian internet freedom group the Kremlin deems a "foreign agent."

Rising online censorship and prosecutions

The Kremlin's seeming indifference about digital monitoring appeared to change after 2011-12 mass protests were coordinated online, prompting authorities to tighten internet controls.

Some regulations allowed them to block websites; others mandated that cellphone operators and internet providers store call records and messages, sharing the information with security services if needed. Authorities pressured companies like Google, Apple and Facebook to store user data on Russian servers, to no avail, and announced plans to build a "sovereign internet" that could be cut off from the rest of the world.

Many experts initially dismissed these efforts as futile, and some still seem ineffective. Russia's measures might amount to a picket fence compared to China's Great Firewall, but the Kremlin online crackdown has gained momentum.

After Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, online censorship and prosecutions for social media posts and comments spiked so much that it broke all existing records.

According to Net Freedoms, a prominent internet rights group, more than 610,000 web pages were blocked or removed by authorities in 2022 — the highest annual total in 15 years — and 779 people faced criminal charges over online comments and posts, also a record.

A major factor was a law, adopted a week after the invasion, that effectively criminalizes antiwar sentiment, said Net Freedoms head Damir Gainutdinov. It outlaws spreading false information" about or discrediting" the army.

Social media users 'shouldn't feel safe'

Harsher anti-extremism laws adopted in 2014 targeted social media users and online speech, leading to hundreds of criminal cases over posts, likes and shares. Most involved users of the popular Russian social media platform VKontakte, which reportedly cooperates with authorities.

As the crackdown widened, authorities also targeted Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Telegram. About a week after the invasion, Facebook, Instagram and Twitter were blocked in Russia, but users of the platforms were still prosecuted.

Marina Novikova, 65, was convicted this month in the Siberian city of Seversk of "spreading false information" about the army for antiwar Telegram posts, fining her the equivalent of over $12,400. A Moscow court last week sentenced opposition activist Mikhail kriger to seven years in prison for Facebook comments in which he expressed a desire "to hang" Putin. Famous blogger Nika Belotserkovskaya, who lives in France, received a nine-year prison term in absentia for Instagram posts about the war that the authorities claimed spread "fakes" about the army.

"Users of any social media platform shouldn't feel safe," Gainutdinov said.

Rights advocates worry that online censorship is about to expand drastically via artificial intelligence systems to monitor social media and websites for content seemed illicit.

In February, the government's media regulator Roskomnadzor said it was launching Oculus — an AI system that looks for banned content in online photos and videos, and can analyze more than 00,000 images a day, compared with bout 200 a day by humans. Two other AI systems in the works will search text materials.

Eyes on — and under — the streets

In 2017-18, Moscow authorities rolled out street cameras enabled by facial recognition technology.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, authorities were able to trace and fine those violating lockdowns.

Vedomosti reported in 2020 that schools would get cameras linked to a facial recognition system dubbed "Orwell," for the British writer of the dystopian novel "1984," with his all-seeing character, "Big Brother."

When protests over the imprisonment of opposition leader Alexei Navalny erupted in 2021, the system was used to find and detain those attending demonstrations, sometimes weeks later. After Putin announced a partial mobilization for Ukraine last year, it apparently helped officials round up draft evaders.

In 2022, "Russian authorities expanded their control over people's biometric data, including by collecting such data from banks, and using facial recognition technology to surveil and persecute activists," Human Rights Watch reported this year.

There are 250,000 surveillance cameras in Moscow enabled by the software, Darbinyan said. Similar systems are in St. Petersburg and other large cities.

He believed the authorities want to build "a web of cameras around the entire country. It sounds like a daunting task, but there are possibilities and funds there to do it."

'Total digital surveillance'

Russia's efforts often draw comparisons with China, where authorities use digital surveillance on a vast scale. Chinese cities are blanketed by millions of cameras that recognize faces, body shapes and how people walk to identify them. Sensitive individuals are routinely tracked, either by cameras or via their cellphones, email and social media accounts to stifle dissent.

The Kremlin seems to want to pursue a similar path. In November, Putin ordered the government to create an online register of those eligible for military service after efforts to mobilize 300,000 men to fight in Ukraine revealed that enlistment records were in serious disarray.

The register, promised to be ready by fall, will collect all kinds of data, political analyst Tatyana Stanovaya said.

Stanovaya believes these restrictions could spread to other aspects of Russian life, with the government "building a state system of total digital surveillance, coercion and punishment."

"The cyber gulag, which was actively talked about during the pandemic, is now taking its real shape," Stanovaya wrote.

Sat, 03 Jun 2023 20:46:00 -0500 en text/html
Australia marks first FX transaction using a CBDC as eAUD pilot continues

Australia has successfully made its first foreign exchange transaction using eAUD as part of a live pilot for the country’s potential central bank digital currency.

It comes amid a rising interest from countries around the world to learn about or launch central bank-issued digital currencies.

Blockchain infrastructure provider Canvas said that on May 17, crypto fund managers DigitalX and TAF Capital traded eAUD against the stablecoin USD Coin (USDC).

Canvas reported the transaction was settled instantly and touted it as a success over what it called the “slow, expensive and prone to errors” traditional FX and remittance networks.

The FX trade was part of a series of tests currently underway as the country explores possible use cases for a CBDC. The pilot program was launched by the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) in conjunction with the financial research institute Digital Finance Cooperative Research Centre (DFCRC).

Canvas’ test explored use of eAUD in tokenized FX settlements, which could point toward the benefits of using the CBDC over fiat currencies and existing settlement platforms.

The transaction was done on a decentralized app on Canvas’ “Connect” — an Ethereum layer 2 that uses StarkWare’s zero-knowledge (ZK) roll-up technology.

Canvas CEO David Lavecky called the trade “historic” and added that the digital dollar could potentially address challenges in FX and remittance markets, such as “improving transaction times, reducing fees and providing more open access.”

Related: BIS issues comprehensive paper on offline CBDC payments

An April pilot test from Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) bank used the CBDC to trade carbon credits.

ANZ used eAUD to back its A$DC stablecoin to trade the credits on a public blockchain and reported the settlement happened “in near real-time.”

Other use cases being tested include offline payments, distribution, custody, tax automation, use in “trusted Web3 commerce,” and even livestock auctions.

The pilot started on March 31 and is set to finish on May 31. A report assessing the various use cases is set to be published on June 30.

Magazine: Here’s how Ethereum’s ZK-rollups can become interoperable