Download links for Practice Questions to pass 301 exam

killexams.com is the particular latest project regarding passing the F5-Networks 301 examination. We now have carefully long gone through and gathered actual LTM Specialist examination concerns and answers, which often are guaranteed specific copies of Real 301 examination questions, up to date, and valid.

301 LTM Specialist exam | http://babelouedstory.com/

301 exam - LTM Specialist Updated: 2024

Where can I get help to pass 301 exam?
Exam Code: 301 LTM Specialist exam January 2024 by Killexams.com team

301 LTM Specialist

The 301a-LTM Specialist: Architect, Set-up & Deploy exam is one of two exams

required to achieve Certified F5 Technology Specialist, LTM status.

Individuals who pass this exam possess an of underlying principles – from SSLbased VPN implementation to symmetric and asymmetric acceleration – and can

draw on that insight to integrate BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) into existing
networks as well as new implementations. This is exam 1 of 2 and is based on
TMOS v11.



Objective 1.01 Given an expected traffic volume, determine the appropriate SNAT
configuration

Explain when SNAT is required

Describe the benefit of using SNAT pools

Objective 1.02 Given a scenario, determine the minimum profiles for an application U/A

Explain security options available for the application

Explain how to use LTM as a service proxy

Describe how a given service is deployed on an LTM

Objective 1.03 Given an application configuration, determine which functions can be
offloaded to the LTM device

Explain how to offload HTTP servers for SSL compression and caching

Objective 1.04 Given an application configuration, determine which functions can be
offloaded to the LTM device

Explain how to create an HTTP configuration to handle an HTTP server error

Objective 1.05 Given an application configuration, determine the appropriate profile and
persistence options

Explain how to create an HTTP configuration for mobile clients

Explain how to create an HTTP configuration to optimize WAN connectivity

Determine when connection mirroring is required

Objective 1.06 Explain the steps necessary to configure AVR U/A

Explain the steps necessary to configure the AVR

Explain how to create an AVR profile and options

Objective 1.07 Given a set of reporting requirements, determine the AVR metrics and entities
to collect

Explain the sizing implications of AVR on the LTM device

Explain the logging and notifications options of AVR

Explain the uses of the collected metrics and entities

Objective 1.08 Given a scenario, determine the appropriate monitor type and parameters to use

Explain how to create an application specific monitor

Given a desired outcome, determine where to apply health monitors

Determine under which circumstances an external monitor is required

Objective 1.09 Given a set of parameters, predict an outcome of a monitor status on other
LTM device objects

Determine the effect of a monitor on the virtual server status

Determine the effect of active versus inline monitors on the application status or on the LTM device

Objective 1.10 Given a set of SSL requirements, determine the appropriate profile options to
create or modify in the SSL profile

Describe the difference between client and server SSL profiles

Describe the difference between client and server SSL processing

Objective 1.11 Given a set of application requirements, describe the steps necessary to
configure SSL

Describe the process to update expired SSL certificates

Describe the steps to incorporate client authentication to the SSL process

Objective 1.12 Given a set of application requirements, determine the appropriate virtual
server type to use

Describe the process to update expired SSL certificates

Describe the steps to incorporate client authentication to the SSL process

Objective 1.13 Given a set of application requirements, determine the appropriate virtual

server configuration settings

Describe which steps are necessary to complete prior to creating the virtual server

Describe the security options when creating a virtual server (i.e., VLAN limitation, route domains, packet
filters, iRules)

Objective 1.14 Explain the matching order of multiple virtual servers U/A

Objective 1.15 Given a scenario, determine the appropriate load balancing method(s) U/A

Identify the behavior of the application to be load balanced

Differentiate different load balancing methods

Explain how to perform outbound load balancing

Explain CARP persistence

Objective 1.16 Explain the effect of LTM device configuration parameters on load balancing
decisions

Differentiate between members and nodes

Explain the effect of the load balancing method on the LTM platform

Explain the effect of CMP on load balancing methods

Explain the effect of OneConnect/MBLB on load balancing

Explain how monitors and load balancing methods interact

Section 2: Set-up, administer, and secure LTM devices Cognitive
Complexity

Objective 2.01 Distinguish between the management interface configuration and application
traffic interface configuration

Explain the requirements for management of the LTM devices

Explain the requirements for the application traffic traversing the LTM devices

Explain how to configure management connectivity options: AOM, serial console, USB & Management
Ethernet Port

Objective 2.02 Given a network diagram, determine the appropriate network and system

settings (i.e., VLANs, selfIPs, trunks, routes, NTP servers, DNS servers,
SNMP receivers and syslog servers)

Explain the requirements for self IPs (including port lockdown)

Explain routing requirements for management and application traffic (including route domains and IPv6)

Explain the effect of system time on LTM devices

Objective 2.03 Given a network diagram, determine the appropriate physical connectivity U/A

Explain physical network connectivity options of LTM devices

Objective 2.04 Explain how to configure remote authentication and multiple administration
roles on the LTM device

Explain the relationship between route domains, user roles and administrative partitions

Explain the mapping between remote users and remote role groups

Explain the options for partition access and terminal access

Objective 2.05 Given a scenario, determine an appropriate high availability configuration (i.e.,
failsafe, failover and timers)

Explain the relationship between route domains, user roles and administrative partitions

Explain the mapping between remote users and remote role groups

Explain the options for partition access and terminal access

Objective 2.06 Given a scenario, describe the steps necessary to set up a device group,
traffic group and HA group

Explain how to set up sync-only and sync-failover device service cluster

Explain how to configure HA groups

Explain how to assign virtual servers to traffic groups

Objective 2.07 Predict the behavior of an LTM device group or traffic groups in a given failure
scenario

Objective 2.08 Determine the effect of LTM features and/or modules on LTM device
performance and/or memory

Determine the effect of iRules on performance

Determine the effect of RAM cache on performance and memory

Determine the effect of compression on performance

Determine the effect of modules on performance and memory

Objective 2.09 Determine the effect of traffic flow on LTM device performance and/or
utilization

Explain how to use traffic groups to maximize capacity

Objective 2.10 Determine the effect of virtual server settings on LTM device performance
and/or utilization

Determine the effect of connection mirroring on performance

Objective 2.11 Describe how to deploy vCMP guests and how the resources are distributed R

Identify platforms that support vCMP

Identify the limitations of vCMP

Describe the effect of licensing and/or provisioning on the vCMP host and vCMP guest

Describe how to deploy vCMP guests

Explain how resources are assigned to vCMP guests (e.g., SSL, memory, CPU, disk)

Objective 2.12 Determine the appropriate LTM device security configuration to protect
against a security threat

Explain the implications of SNAT and NAT on network promiscuity

Explain the implications of forwarding virtual servers on the environment security

Describe how to disable services

Describe how to disable ARP

Explain how to set up logging for security events on the LTM device

Explain how route domains can be used to enforce network segmentation

Section 3: Deploy applications Cognitive

Complexity

Objective 3.01 Describe how to deploy and modify applications using existing and/or updated
iApp application templates

Identify the appropriate application template to use to deploy the application

Describe how to locate, retrieve and import new and updated application templates

Identify use cases for deploying the application templates

Objective 3.02 Given application requirements, determine the appropriate profiles and profile
settings to use

Describe the connections between profiles and virtual servers

Describe profile inheritance

Explain how to configure the different SSL profile settings

Explain the effect of changing protocol settings

Explain the use cases for the fast protocols (e.g. fastL4, fastHTTP)

Explain the persistence overrides

Describe the use of HTTP classes and profiles

Describe the link between iRules and statistics, iRules and stream, and iRule events and profiles

Describe the link between iRules and persistence

Describe hashing persistence methods

Describe the cookie persistence options

Determine which profiles are appropriate for a given application

Determine when an iRule is preferred over a profile or vice versa

Explain how to manipulate the packet contents using profiles

Objective 3.03 Determine the effect of traffic flow on LTM device performance and/or
utilization

Describe the effect of priority groups on load balancing

Explain the effects of SNAT settings on pools

Explain how persistence settings can override connection limits

Describe the relationship between monitors and state

Describe the functionality of Action On Service Down

Describe the functionality of Priority Group Activation

Describe the persistence across pools and services (e.g., Match Across Services, Match Across vs Match
Across Pools)

Describe how connection limits are affected by node, pool and virtual server settings

Describe how priority groups are affected by connection limits
LTM Specialist
F5-Networks Specialist exam

Other F5-Networks exams

101 Application Delivery Fundamentals 2023
201 BIG-IP Administrator
301 LTM Specialist
001-ARXConfig ARX Configuration
301b BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Specialist : Maintain & Troubleshoot
F50-522 F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Management Advanced v9.4
F50-528 F5 ARX Configuring 5.x
F50-532 BIG-IP v10.x LTM Advanced Topics V10.x
F50-536 BIG-IP ASM v10.x (F50-536)

You can obtain 100% marks in the 301 exam with our 301 dumps that contains real exam questions and VCE exam simulator. You do not need anything else to pass the 301 exam at very first attempt. Just go through our questions and answers, VCE exam with our 301 VCE exam simulator and take the real test.
F5-Networks
301
LTM Specialist
https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/301
Question: 47
A BIG-IP has two SNATs, a pool of DNS servers and a virtual server configured to
load-balance UDP traffic to the DNS servers. One SNAT's address is 64.100.130.10;
this SNAT is defined for all addresses. The second SNAT's address is
64.100.130.20; this SNAT is defined for three specific addresses, 172.16.3.54,
172.16.3.55, and 172.16.3.56. The virtual server's destination is
64.100.130.30:53. The SNATs and virtual server have default VLAN associations. If
a client with IP address 172.16.3.55 initiates a request to the virtual server, what is the
source IP address of the packet as it reaches the chosen DNS server?
A. 64.100.130.30
B. 172.16.3.55
C. 64.100.130.20
D. 64.100.130.10
Answer: C
Question: 48
A, steaming profile will do which of the following?
A. Search and replace all occurrences of a specified string only is responses processed
by a virtual server.
B. Search and replace all occurrences of a specified string only in request processed
by a virtual server.
C. Search and replace all occurrences of a specified string in requests and responses
processed by a virtual server.
D. Search and replace the first occurrence of a specified of a specified string in either
a request or response processed by a virtual server.
Answer: C
Question: 49
A monitor has been defined using the HTTP monitor template. The send and receive
strings were customized, but all other settings were left at their defaults. Which
resources can the monitor be assigned to?
A. only specific pool members
B. most virtual severs
C. most nodes
D. most pools
21
Answer: D
22
For More exams visit https://killexams.com/vendors-exam-list
Kill your exam at First Attempt....Guaranteed!

F5-Networks Specialist exam - BingNews https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/301 Search results F5-Networks Specialist exam - BingNews https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/301 https://killexams.com/exam_list/F5-Networks F5 Networks No result found, try new keyword!METHODOLOGY: The numbers on this page are based on contributions from PACs and individuals giving $200 or more. All donations were made during the 2022 election cycle and were released by the Federal ... Sun, 28 Mar 2021 10:02:00 -0500 en-US text/html https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/f5-networks/recipients?id=D000072830 F5 Networks To Buy Edge-As-A-Service Specialist Volterra

F5 Networks is buying startup Volterra for about $500 million for its distributed cloud services expertise. The deal will strengthen F5’s leadership position in enterprise application security and delivery, according to the company.

ARTICLE TITLE HERE

Application delivery specialist F5 Networks revealed its plans to acquire Volterra, a four-year old startup with an edge-as-a-service platform, for about $500 million.

The definitive agreement, announced Thursday afternoon, will involve F5 acquiring all issued and outstanding shares of privately held Volterra for approximately $440 million in cash and approximately $60 million in deferred consideration and assumed unvested incentive compensation to founders and employees, according to the two companies.

The deal will strengthen F5’s leadership position in enterprise application security and delivery. Together with the Volterra platform, F5 will be building a secure, app-driven edge platform -- Edge 2.0 -- with “unlimited scale” for enterprises and service providers, F5 said in a statement.

[Related: F5 Networks’ NGINX Portfolio Won’t Slow Down ‘Modern’ App Developers]

“Current edge solutions are simply inadequate for today’s enterprise customers. It’s time to break out of closed edge systems that only perpetuate the pain of building, running, and securing apps,” said François Locoh-Donou, president and CEO of F5 in a statement. “With Volterra, we advance our Adaptive Applications vision with an Edge 2.0 platform that solves the complex multi-cloud reality enterprise customers confront.”

Founded in Santa Clara, Calif., Volterra owns a platform that lets enterprises build, deploy, secure and operate applications and data in a uniform fashion across all public and private clouds and edge compute environments.

“The need to deliver rich digital experiences has meant that more and more of our customers are asking for expanded security and reliability features that are seamlessly integrated across their clouds and edge deployments,” Ankur Singla, Volterra‘s founder and CEO said in a blog post on the announcement. “As part of F5, we will have access to industry-leading app security capabilities to augment our unique SaaS-based networking, security and app management platform. We also get immediate access to a top-tier go-to-market team that has the deep industry experience in the app delivery and security market.”

Prior to starting Volterra, Singla founded and let software-defined networking company Contrail, which was purchased by Juniper in 2012 for $176 million.

As a result of the deal, F5 is expanding its total revenue growth expectations for its fiscal years 2021 and 2022. F5 is also repeating its commitment to $1 billion in share repurchases in the next two years, including a $500 million accelerated share repurchase in fiscal year 2021.

Thu, 07 Jan 2021 08:58:00 -0600 text/html https://www.crn.com/news/networking/f5-networks-to-buy-edge-as-a-service-specialist-volterra
F5 Channel Chief Lisa Citron On The Shape Security Deal And How Partners Must ‘Adopt And Expand’

‘We’re looking at how we better move forward with customer success and then practice building — how we can help [partners] amplify and accelerate what they’re doing with us around cloud managed services,’ F5’s Channel Chief Lisa Citron tells CRN.

ARTICLE TITLE HERE

Adapting Along The Way

F5 Networks, a longtime application delivery specialist, has been honing its skills over the last two years as a multi-cloud application security expert, too.

Seattle-based F5 closed its $1 billion acquisition of Shape Security in 2020, and since then, the company has been integrating Shape Security’s fraud and abuse prevention capabilities into its portfolio. This bet paid off big in 2020, as enterprises grappled with an influx of traffic coming onto their networks from all different locations as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

At the same time, partners needed to reach and work with their clients in new ways, and F5 has been there to help solution providers learn about and support “adaptive applications” — the company’s term for an application’s ability to grow, shrink, defend, and heal themselves based on the environment they’re in and how they’re being used.

F5’s Vice president of Worldwide Channel Sales, Lisa Citron, caught up with CRN about how the company has been working hand-in-hand with partners, the Shape Security acquisition, and the subscription selling model. She also shared the big opportunities she sees that are only getting bigger this year around cloud, edge, and managed services.

Here’s what Citron had to say.

What are your big areas of focus for F5 partners right now?

There’s more going on with F5 than ever before. Learning and understanding our adaptive app messaging — that is really inclusive of everything, from security, all the way out to how do we serve the edge and where applications should be with the most scale available. There’s really a place for so many of our partners to really accelerate with F5. I think it starts for them in understanding that adaptive applications message and focusing in on an area that amplifies what they’re good at. Whether that be cloud, security, or next-generation architecture, all of those things are alive and active here. And we really want to meet that partner on the journey that they’re on and help them understand how to take F5 with them. We’re looking at how we better move forward with customer success and then practice building — how we can help [partners] amplify and accelerate what they’re doing with us around cloud managed services.

Right now, we’re launching a subscription growth program, which focuses that partner on adoption and expansion. So, how do we partner together on customer success and help that end user? And how do you get [partners] to be more focused on the adoption and expansion with their customers and incentivizing them for that, and helping them set up those customer success motions, which are so key, as many of us in the industry turn to these software-based go to market approaches.

What have partners been asking F5 for over the course of the last year?

I think that most of the F5 partners have experienced a positive upturn in their business in this COVID era. I think we all went into it very nervous about what the world was going to look like [and] how customers were going to engage. On the early side of COVID, we had this conversation around how to support what [partners] do, and there were definitely situations where we jumped in and offered education and better terms, and the things that in the early days people needed, but I but I think that we’ve all seen the positivity in the business. But that’s also led to the conversation around how can we evolve the business together? The customers are asking for new ways of working and that is definitely accelerating what we as a vendor have to do, [but also], how do we help our partners that aren’t there yet in their businesses? How do we help them accelerate, and continue to work with us? We have a lot of partners that have been on the journey with us for a long time, but the business is changing.

An example would be that so many of the partners were event marketers. Their version of marketing was getting customers out. And now, in this era where digital communication is so important, how do you help the regional partner advance that? For F5, that’s really meant putting more effort to how to deliver them concierge campaigns [and] understanding how to fit what we do into their businesses. Then similarly, much like a lot of others in the market, how do we start focusing on specialization areas with the partners who have taken the lead in things like app development and cloud, and looking at them differently than I think we have in the past. I would say that this year, it’s been a year of a lot of listening, and a lot of thinking how we evolved together for the future.

Are you seeing more partners pursuing specialization areas and do you think COVID-19 has shaped that transition?

I think the three areas that are merging really fast in our ecosystem is [number one,] cloud. I think the cloud providers are doing a better job than ever in focusing in on the channel and recognizing the channel’s role in helping customers. The second is managed services, which I would argue other manufacturers have been faster to move on than F5. But I will tell you that that this is a dynamic shift, and when I say faster to move than F5, I mean it from the lens of we offer our managed services, but how do we get the partner to be more involved than just reselling it? How do you actually embed something into their business? The third area is the app dev work as we’ve seen a lot of partners go buy the experience that they haven’t had. We’re seeing more consolidation is happening so rapidly, and you look and you look at what our partners are buying, and they’re buying cloud skill sets, modern application, modern architecture skillsets, and that really aligns well with this idea of making sure an app has services no matter where that app is.

I definitely think [those trends] have been sped up by COVID. I think that customers are realizing that the value of outsourcing certain things is freeing up the time of their own people to focus on what will drive them forward. I’m beginning to see that more and more. It’s an opportunity that we are trying to make sure that the midsized partner — or at least the midsized partner to us — recognizes is there for them. Over the next, I would say a year, you’re going to see us emerge with a more concerted program against it. Right now, we’re piloting a couple of different ways of working and are going to our strongest regional system integrators and understanding what they need from us in order to activate that motion, because we think that they can be a really important bridge in helping that customer get to the strategic initiatives that, by outsourcing things that are not as strategic, the partner can participate in more.

Tell us about the enhancements F5 has made recently to its application security portfolio thanks to the Shape Security acquisition and the opportunities that brings for partners?

I think the exciting things specifically about the Shape offering is putting those offerings into the hands of our partners to be able to help deliver their customers insight and help build business in the process. Anything from Device ID, which allows a partner to install something at the end user and allows them to build a view around the data and build it into a security assessment that they’re already giving. Now, they can analyze customer traffic, pinpoint things like how much automated versus manual fraud is going on. Not only are they doing something that’s not going to cost the end user to use it, but it becomes a value add to those partners’ security assessment mindset and a path to build an offer to that end user to help them mitigate the risk, and potentially even sell SOC service to them. I think what you’re beginning to see us do is figure out how we can use these tools in order to not only demonstrate to an end user that there could be a problem, but bake it into the way our partners are working.

Did Shape Security have an existing partner program before it was purchased by F5?

No, they did not. At the time of acquisition, they had a relatively small customer base — very impressive logos, I will say, and an incredible fit into the enterprise, which is where F5 plays also. So, we knew it was a great combination. But there is such a huge opportunity to grow that through the security experts in the F5 channel. We have a great base of security-oriented partners, so this is a real opportunity for our security partners to leverage the best that Shape brings to the table. It allows them to also branch out. So, you’ve got things like, looking at traffic through Device ID, but it also allows them to touch into areas around fraud risk that they might not otherwise have been involved in. And that that offers them a way to sort of open the aperture of what they’re consulting that end user on.

I think that’s what everybody’s looking for — how do they add that leg up to what they do? We’re very excited about that opportunity, whether it be Shape, whether it be our Silverline Security offerings, as these things come together.

How big is the area of opportunity at the edge for partners?

Oh, it’s a super-hot space. I think what partners have an opportunity to do right now — and in leveraging our acquisition of [edge as a service provider] Volterra — is really go in and help that end user determine where the app should live. Whether that’s public cloud, [or] sitting in a data center more centralized, or is it living at the edge? What are those opportunities and improvements in how they serve their customers?

When we make it about the business outcome, the partner gets to walk that end user through that experience of being a customer of theirs means — whether that’s an internal customer or external customer — [partners can] help them make key decisions about where the apps should live and what services and security the application needs. So, you can even fast forward to the opportunity with Volterra to be able to build a stack of managed capability on top of it. It’s so multifaceted right now. We’re really focusing a key set of partners on helping to bake that channel-oriented message for their consumption. That’s a big part of my strategy — not assuming all the time that we understand what’s best for the partner — and beginning to leverage that work that a key group who are already down the path of edge can do in helping others come along on the journey.

Thu, 13 May 2021 05:45:00 -0500 text/html https://www.crn.com/slide-shows/networking/f5-channel-chief-lisa-citron-on-the-shape-security-deal-and-how-partners-must-adopt-and-expand
Is It Best For F5 Networks To Sell-Off Itself?

F5 networks this week traded up 12% higher following reports that the company retained Goldman Sachs to represent the company in the wake of apparent buyout offers. In the past, F5 has surfaced as a potential acquisition target among the tech giants such as IBM , Cisco and Juniper . As is generally the case, neither Goldman nor F5 would comment. Although no deal has arisen from any previous such talks, here are reasons as to why F5 Networks might well consider a sell-off this time. Consider the following:

  1. Difficult Application Delivery Controller Market: According to Gartner, F5 Networks has remained a market leader and has seen market share gains in the ADC market in the past few years.  Also, according to past reports, the ADC market was expected to grow at a CAGR of 12.5% during 2013-2018 period. However, given that F5’s product revenue growth has averaged around 6% only in the past 3 years, we shall be overly optimistic if we assume a 10% growth for the next 5 years. According to our model, we expect F5’s product revenue to grow at an average rate of approximately 5% during this period. This is a sharp decline as compared to F5’s product revenue growth of 29% between 2010-2012.
  2. Cloud based services may well disrupt the ADC market: Until a few years ago, before the popularity of cloud based services, we were clear about the fact that the ADC market size was directly proportional to the number of web applications being deployed. However, more and more applications are being deployed in the public cloud, where there is less need for a traditional load-balancer. For example, Amazon uses elastic load balancing , which is used to distribute incoming application traffic across multiple Amazon EC2 instances in the cloud, for applications using Amazon web services. Although F5’s load-balancer is customisable and is built on high-performance hardware, Amazon’s ELB is a bit different and it completely abstracts the hardware. Further, the plus point for an Amazon ELB is that it wipes out the hassle of installing and customizing a dedicated hardware for load balancing, which is a must in case of BIG-IP based products. Going ahead, cloud based load-balancers may well disrupt the traditional application delivery controller market, which can largely affect F5’s revenue growth. This is one key reason as to why we forecast F5’s product revenue to grow in mid-single digits and not experience double digit growth over the next 5 years.
  3. F5 Networks stock has relatively under-performed of late: Over the past one year, the company’s stock has hovered between a high of $134 and $86. For most of the time, the stock remained below the levels of $110. This can be attributed to a weak guidance for the coming quarters and a roughly flat revenue growth during this period. Further, the company also lost a patent battle against Radware which took a bite of its earnings during this period.
  4. The upcoming product refresh cycle can provide the much needed revenue growth: Though the company hasn’t provided the details of the upcoming product refresh cycle, F5 Networks is on its way for the hardware upgrade of its current line up of products. This upgrade holds the potential to boost the company’s short-term products revenue. F5’s high cash and no debt position, along with its short-term revenue growth prospects, makes it an attractive acquisition target at this time. The company can command a relatively higher premium if it sells-off itself at this point of time.

For information, please refer to our complete analysis for F5 Networks

View Interactive Institutional Research (Powered by Trefis):

Global Large Cap | U.S. Mid & Small Cap | European Large & Mid Cap

More Trefis Research

Like our charts? Embed them in your own posts using the Trefis WordPress Plugin.

Thu, 09 Jun 2016 05:34:00 -0500 Trefis Team en text/html https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2016/06/09/is-it-best-for-f5-networks-to-sell-off-itself/
Here's Why F5 (FFIV) is a Strong Contender for Portfolio Pick

F5's FFIV shares jumped 21.2% post fourth-quarter fiscal 2023 earnings release, buoyed by strong performance. The surge showcases investors' trust in F5's solid finances and its strategic position in application delivery, networking and security solutions.

FFIV's earnings has outpaced estimates in each of the trailing four quarters, delivering an average surprise of 7.76%. This indicates an impressive track record of exceeding earnings estimates. Moreover, the company has a long-term earnings growth expectation of 5.4%.

The stock carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) and has a Growth Score of B at present. The Growth Style Score condenses all the essential metrics from a company’s financial statements to get a true sense of the quality and sustainability of its growth. Per Zacks’ proprietary methodology, stocks with a combination of a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) or #2 and a Growth Score of A or B offer solid investment opportunities.

With healthy fundamentals, the stock appears to be a solid investment option at the moment.

F5, Inc. Price and Consensus

F5, Inc. price-consensus-chart | F5, Inc. Quote

Growth Drivers

F5’s stronger-than-expected fourth-quarter fiscal 2023 results have boosted investors’ confidence. F5 Networks stands out to benefit from the booming application networking market. With a strong hold in Layer 4-7 content switching and a solid position in data centers, the company is poised to expand market share, especially given the increasing demands for capacity and security in next-gen applications.

F5 is one of the major players in the application delivery controller (ADC) market, offering vital products for data center consolidation, virtualization and cloud services. Additionally, F5 has gained significant market share due to Cisco's shift away from the core ADC market. It is also a major developer and provider of software-defined application services, ensuring secure, speedy and accessible applications across IP networks on any device and at any time.

FFIV collaborated with industry leaders, including Microsoft, Oracle, VMware, Cisco Systems and HP, to offer integrated application services for their Software Defined Networking offerings. It has also partnered with Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, VMware vCloud Air, Cisco ACI and others for cloud-based application services. These partnerships increase access to new tech, aid product innovation, strengthen F5's cybersecurity suite, support joint sales and marketing efforts, and enhance its competitive edge.

The company is altering its business model by focusing on subscription-based services, which generate steady revenues and increase profits. The company has also made cost-saving moves like reducing staff, trimming facility space and cutting travel. These initiatives are aimed at lowering operating expenses and improving margins in the short run. Moreover, F5 boasts a strong balance sheet, ample liquidity and reduced debt, making it lucrative to investors.

Other Key Picks

Logitech LOGI, carrying a Zacks Rank #2 at present, is capitalizing on the surge of hybrid work patterns, which are expected to increase the need for its video collaboration tools, keyboards, combos and pointing devices. The thriving cloud-based video conferencing services remain a primary driving force behind this. You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank stocks here.

The growing adoption of new mobile platforms in both mature and emerging markets is driving Logitech's peripherals and accessories demand. Additionally, the company has been able to leverage its software and go-to-market capabilities to increase its market share.

The consensus mark for fiscal 2024 earnings has moved north 11 cents to $3.43 per share over the past 60 days, indicating a 6.52% increase from the fiscal 2023 level. LOGI has a Growth Score of A.

NVIDIA Corporation NVDA, carrying a Zacks Rank #2 at present, is reaping the rewards of increased investments in generative AI. The surge in generative AI technology is poised to create substantial demand for its next-gen high-performance computing chips. With rising investments in AI across the data center sector, NVDA anticipates its fourth-quarter fiscal 2024 revenues to soar to $20 billion from $6.05 billion in the previous year’s quarter.

NVIDIA maintains a dominant position in the AI chip market, with its GPUs already integrated into AI models. This expansion of NVDA’s reach is extending into previously untapped sectors, such as automotive, healthcare and manufacturing. Collaborations with Mercedes-Benz and Audi are poised to further bolster NVIDIA's presence in autonomous vehicles and other automotive electronics domains.

The consensus mark for fiscal 2024 earnings has been revised upward by 12 cents to $12.29 per share over the past 30 days, indicating a whopping 268% increase from fiscal 2023. The stock has a Growth Score of A and has a long-term earnings growth expectation of 13.5%.

CrowdStrike CRWD carries a Zacks Rank #2 and has a Growth Score of A. CRWD is capitalizing on heightened demand for cyber-security solutions, driven by numerous data breaches and the growing necessity for security and networking products amid the rise of hybrid work practices.

Ongoing digital transformations and the migration to cloud services within organizations serve as pivotal factors driving growth. The company's robust portfolio, including the Falcon platform's 10 cloud modules, fortifies its competitive advantage and attracts new users. Furthermore, strategic acquisitions like Bionic and Reposify are anticipated to propel further growth.

The Zacks Consensus Estimate for CrowdStrike’s fiscal 2024 earnings has moved north 12 cents in the past 30 days to $2.94 per share, indicating growth of 90.9% on a year-over-year basis. The long-term expected earnings growth rate for CRWD is pegged at 36.1%.

Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report

Logitech International S.A. (LOGI) : Free Stock Analysis Report

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) : Free Stock Analysis Report

F5, Inc. (FFIV) : Free Stock Analysis Report

CrowdStrike (CRWD) : Free Stock Analysis Report

To read this article on Zacks.com click here.

Zacks Investment Research

Thu, 28 Dec 2023 22:27:00 -0600 en-US text/html https://finance.yahoo.com/news/heres-why-f5-ffiv-strong-172700711.html
After A 13% Fall This Year How Does Ciena Compare With F5 Stock?

Given its better prospects, we believe Ciena stock (NYSE: CIEN), a network hardware, software, and services provider, is a better pick than its sector peer, F5 Networks stock (NASDAQ NDAQ : FFIV), an application security and cloud networking company. Investors have assigned a higher valuation multiple of 3.7x revenues for FFIV compared to 1.5x revenues for CIEN due to F5’s superior revenue growth and profitability. The decision to invest often comes down to finding the best stocks within the parameters of certain characteristics that suit an investment style. The size of profits can matter, as larger profits can imply greater market power. In the sections below, we discuss why we believe that CIEN will offer better returns than FFIV in the next three years. We compare a slew of factors, such as historical revenue growth, stock returns, and valuation, in an interactive dashboard analysis of F5 vs. Ciena CIEN : Which Stock Is A Better Bet? Parts of the analysis are summarized below.

FFIV stock has seen little change, moving slightly from levels of $175 in early January 2021 to around $175 now, while CIEN stock has seen a decline of 20% from levels of $55 to around $45 over the same period. In comparison, the S&P500 index saw an increase of about 25% over this roughly three-year period.

Overall, the performance of FFIV stock with respect to the index has been lackluster. Returns for the stock were 39% in 2021, -41% in 2022, and 21% in 2023. Similarly, however, the decrease in CIEN stock has been far from consistent. Returns for the stock were 46% in 2021, -34% in 2022, and -13% in 2023. In comparison, returns for the S&P 500 have been 27% in 2021, -19% in 2022, and 23% in 2023 - indicating that FFIV and CIEN underperformed the S&P in 2022 and 2023.

In fact, consistently beating the S&P 500 - in good times and bad - has been difficult over latest years for individual stocks; for heavyweights in the Information Technology sector, including AAPL, MSFT, and NVDA, and even for the megacap stars GOOG, TSLA, and AMZN. In contrast, the Trefis High Quality Portfolio, with a collection of 30 stocks, has outperformed the S&P 500 each year over the same period. Why is that? As a group, HQ Portfolio stocks provided better returns with less risk versus the benchmark index, less of a roller-coaster ride, as evident in HQ Portfolio performance metrics.

Given the current uncertain macroeconomic environment with high oil prices and elevated interest rates, could FFIV and CIEN face a similar situation as they did in 2022 and 2023 and underperform the S&P over the next 12 months - or will they see a strong jump? While we expect both stocks to move higher in the next three years, we think CIEN will fare better.

1. F5’s Revenue Growth Is Better

  • F5’s revenue growth has been better, with a 6.2% average annual growth rate in the last three years, compared to 0.6% for Ciena.
  • FFIV revenues rose from $2.4 billion in fiscal 2020 (fiscal ends in September) to $2.8 billion in 2023, led by services and product revenue growth due to increasing demand and entry into new markets.
  • For Ciena, revenue increased from $3.5 billion in fiscal 2020 (fiscal ends in October) to $4.4 billion in 2023, led by continued growth in Global Services Platform Software and Services, while the Networking Platforms business also saw a rebound in fiscal 2023.
  • Supply chain issues weighed on the company’s overall performance in the latest past, and it still remains a concern.
  • Ciena expects its routing and switching business to grow faster in the coming years and drive the overall top-line growth.
  • If we look at the last twelve-month period revenues, Ciena fares better with sales growth of 14% vs. 5% for F5.
  • Our F5 Revenue Comparison and Ciena Revenue Comparison dashboards provide more insight into the companies’ sales.
  • Looking forward, we expect Ciena to see better sales growth than F5. We forecast F5’s top-line to expand at a CAGR of 3.4% to $3.1 billion in three years, while Ciena will likely see its sales rise in a mid-single-digit average annual growth rate to $5.3 billion over this period, based on Trefis Machine Learning analysis.

2. F5 Is More Profitable

  • F5’s operating margin declined from 23.1% in 2019 to 15.0% in 2022, while Ciena’s operating margin contracted from 14.5% in fiscal 2020 to 8.8% in 2023.
  • Looking at the last twelve-month period, F5’s operating margin of 14.6% fares better than 8.8% for Ciena.
  • F5’s margin metric has been weighed down due to a rise in component costs.
  • Our F5 Operating Income Comparison and Ciena’s Operating Income Comparison dashboards have more details.
  • Looking at financial risk, F5 fares better. F5 is a debt-free company, while Ciena’s debt as a percentage of equity is around 24%. However, Ciena’s 22% cash as a percentage of assets is higher than 13% for F5, implying that F5 has a better debt position and Ciena has more cash cushion.

3. The Net of It All

  • We see that F5 has seen better revenue growth and is more profitable.
  • Now, looking at prospects using P/S as a base, due to high fluctuations in P/E and P/EBIT, we believe Ciena will offer higher returns in the next three years.
  • Also, if we compare the current valuation multiples to the historical averages, CIEN fares better. F5 stock is trading at 3.7x revenues compared to its last five-year average of 4.3x. In comparison, Ciena stock trades at 1.7x revenues vs. the last five-year average of 2.2x.
  • Our F5 Valuation Ratios Comparison and Ciena Valuation Ratios Comparison have more details.
  • The table below summarizes our revenue and return expectations for both companies over the next three years and points to an expected return of -12% for FFIV over this period vs. a 31% expected return for CIEN, based on Trefis Machine Learning analysis – F5 vs. Ciena – which also provides more details on how we arrive at these numbers.

While CIEN stock may outperform FFIV, it is helpful to see how F5’s peers fare on metrics that matter. You will find other valuable comparisons for companies across industries at Peer Comparisons.

Invest with Trefis Market Beating Portfolios

See all Trefis Price Estimates

Mon, 18 Dec 2023 20:00:00 -0600 Trefis Team en text/html https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2023/12/19/after-a-13-fall-this-year-how-does-ciena-compare-with-f5-stock/
F5: Hardware Headwinds Hitting
Server room background

piranka

Despite the stock performing well over the past five months, F5, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:FFIV) returns in 2023 are still only in line with broader indices. This is counter to my expectation of poor performance due to:

  • Declining product sales in
Fri, 22 Dec 2023 07:18:00 -0600 en text/html https://seekingalpha.com/article/4659266-f5-hardware-headwinds-hitting
F5 to Buy Volterra, Lifts Estimate of 1st-Quarter Earnings No result found, try new keyword!F5 will acquire software startup Volterra for $440 million in cash and $60 million in other consideration. And it lifted its estimate of first-quarter earnings. The moves prompted some analysts to ... Fri, 08 Jan 2021 03:19:00 -0600 text/html https://www.thestreet.com/investing/f5-to-buy-volterra-and-estimates-earnings-above-earlier-forecast F5 Networks

F5 Networks, Inc. is a provider of multi-cloud application services which enable its customers to develop, deploy, operate, secure, and govern applications in any architecture, from on-premises to the public cloud. The Company's enterprise-grade application services are available as cloud-based, software-as-a-service, and software-only solutions optimized for multi-cloud environments, with modules that can run independently, or as part of an integrated solution on its appliances. In connection with its solutions, the Company offers a range of professional services, including consulting, training, installation, maintenance, and other technical support services. The Company's customers include large enterprise businesses, public sector institutions, Governments, and service providers. It conducts its business globally and manage its business by geography. Its business is organized into three geographic regions: Americas; Europe, Middle East, and Africa; and the Asia Pacific region.

Thu, 12 Jan 2023 21:06:00 -0600 en text/html https://www.moneycontrol.com/us-markets/stockpricequote/f5networks/FFIV




301 learner | 301 PDF Download | 301 exam syllabus | 301 benefits | 301 techniques | 301 test prep | 301 study tips | 301 information search | 301 benefits | 301 testing |


Killexams exam Simulator
Killexams Questions and Answers
Killexams Exams List
Search Exams
301 exam dump and training guide direct download
Training Exams List