1Y0-341 availability - Citrix ADC Advanced syllabus - Security Management and Optimization Updated: 2023 | ||||||||
People used these 1Y0-341 dumps to get 100% marks | ||||||||
![]() |
||||||||
|
||||||||
Exam Code: 1Y0-341 Citrix ADC Advanced syllabus - Security Management and Optimization availability November 2023 by Killexams.com team | ||||||||
1Y0-341 Citrix ADC Advanced syllabus - Security Management and Optimization Exam Specification: 1Y0-341 Citrix ADC Advanced syllabus - Security Management and Optimization Exam Name: 1Y0-341 Citrix ADC Advanced syllabus - Security Management and Optimization Exam Code: 1Y0-341 Exam Duration: 2 hours Passing Score: 65% Exam Format: Multiple-choice Exam Delivery: In-person proctored exam Course Outline: 1. Introduction to Citrix ADC Security and Optimization - Overview of Citrix ADC and its role in security and optimization - Understanding the importance of security management and optimization - Exploring advanced syllabus related to Citrix ADC security and optimization 2. Advanced Security Features and Configuration - Configuring advanced security policies and features - Implementing SSL/TLS offloading and client certificate authentication - Protecting against common web attacks using Citrix ADC 3. Traffic Optimization and Load Balancing - Advanced traffic optimization techniques - Load balancing configurations and algorithms - Implementing global server load balancing (GSLB) for high availability 4. Citrix ADC Management and Troubleshooting - Managing Citrix ADC appliances and configurations - Monitoring and troubleshooting security and optimization issues - Utilizing logs and diagnostic tools for problem resolution 5. Citrix ADC Security Best Practices - Implementing security best practices for Citrix ADC deployments - Securing Citrix ADC management interfaces and access - Auditing and compliance considerations for Citrix ADC security Exam Objectives: 1. Understand the role and importance of security management and optimization in Citrix ADC. 2. Configure advanced security features and policies in Citrix ADC. 3. Implement SSL/TLS offloading and client certificate authentication. 4. Protect against common web attacks using Citrix ADC. 5. Optimize traffic and load balancing using Citrix ADC. 6. Implement global server load balancing (GSLB) for high availability. 7. Manage and troubleshoot Citrix ADC appliances and configurations. 8. Monitor and troubleshoot security and optimization issues. 9. Implement security best practices for Citrix ADC deployments. 10. Secure Citrix ADC management interfaces and access. 11. Understand auditing and compliance considerations for Citrix ADC security. Exam Syllabus: Section 1: Introduction to Citrix ADC Security and Optimization (10%) - Overview of Citrix ADC and its role in security and optimization - Importance of security management and optimization - Advanced syllabus in Citrix ADC security and optimization Section 2: Advanced Security Features and Configuration (30%) - Configuring advanced security policies and features - Implementing SSL/TLS offloading and client certificate authentication - Protecting against common web attacks using Citrix ADC Section 3: Traffic Optimization and Load Balancing (20%) - Advanced traffic optimization techniques - Load balancing configurations and algorithms - Implementing global server load balancing (GSLB) for high availability Section 4: Citrix ADC Management and Troubleshooting (25%) - Managing Citrix ADC appliances and configurations - Monitoring and troubleshooting security and optimization issues - Utilizing logs and diagnostic tools for problem resolution Section 5: Citrix ADC Security Best Practices (15%) - Implementing security best practices for Citrix ADC deployments - Securing Citrix ADC management interfaces and access - Auditing and compliance considerations for Citrix ADC security | ||||||||
Citrix ADC Advanced syllabus - Security Management and Optimization Citrix Optimization availability | ||||||||
Other Citrix exams1Y0-203 Citrix XenApp and XenDesktop 7.15 Administration1Y0-440 Architecting a Citrix Networking Solution 1Y0-204 Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops 7 Administration 1Y0-403 Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops 7 Assessment, Design and Advanced Configurations 1Y0-312 Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops 7 Advanced Administration 1Y0-341 Citrix ADC Advanced syllabus - Security Management and Optimization 1Y0-241 Deploy and Manage Citrix ADC with Traffic Management | ||||||||
killexams.com high quality 1Y0-341 VCE test simulator is extremely encouraging for our clients for the test prep. Immensely valid 1Y0-341 questions, points and definitions are featured in brain dumps pdf. Social occasion the information in one place is a genuine help and causes you get ready for the IT certification test inside a brief timeframe traverse. The 1Y0-341 test offers key focuses. The killexams.com pass4sure 1Y0-341 dumps retains the essential questions or ideas of the 1Y0-341 exam. | ||||||||
Citrix 1Y0-341 Citrix ADC Advanced syllabus - Security? Management and Optimization https://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/1Y0-341 Question: 51 Scenario: A Citrix Engineer used Learning to establish the HTML SQL Injection relaxations for a critical web application. The engineer now wishes to begin working on the protections for a different web application. The name of the Web App Profile is appfw_prof_customercare. Which CLI command can the engineer use to empty the Learn database? A. set appfw learningsettings appfw_prof_customercare -SQLInjectionMinThreshold 0 B. set appfw learningsettings appfw_prof_customercare -startURLMinThreshold 0 C. reset appfw learningdata D. export appfw learningdata appfw_prof_customercare Answer: C Question: 52 Scenario: A Citrix Engineer wants to configure the Citrix ADC for OAuth authentication. The engineer uploads the required certificates, configure the actions, and creates all the necessary policies. After binding the authentication policy to the application, the engineer is unable to authenticate. What is the most likely cause of this failure? A. The log files are full. B. The Redirect URL is incorrect. C. The certificates have expired. D. The policy bindings were assigned incorrect priorities. Answer: D Explanation: Reference: https://docs.citrix.com/en-us/citrix-adc/current-release/aaa-tm/entities-of-authentication-authorization- auditing/authentication-policies.html Question: 53 Scenario: A Citrix Engineer has enabled the IP Reputation feature. The engineer wants to protect a critical web application from a distributed denial of service attack. Which advanced expression can the engineer write for a Responder policy? A. CLIEN B. I C. SR D. IPREP_THREAT_CATEGORY(SPAM_SOURCES) E. CLIEN F. I G. SR H. IPREP_THREAT_CATEGORY(BOTNETS) . CLIEN . I . SR . IPREP_THREAT_CATEGORY(WEB_ATTACKS) . CLIEN . I . SR . IPREP_THREAT_CATEGORY(WINDOWS_EXPLOITS) Answer: C Question: 54 A Citrix Engineer needs to set up access to an internal application for external partners. Which two entities must the engineer configure on the Citrix ADC to support this? (Choose two.) A. SAML Policy B. SAML IdP Profile C. SAML IdP Policy D. SAML Action Answer: A,C Explanation: Reference: https://www.citrix.com/blogs/2015/04/09/how-to-use-saml-authentication-with-storefront-2-6/ Question: 55 Which report can a Citrix Engineer review to ensure that the Citrix ADC meets all PCI-DSS requirements. A. Generate Application Firewall Configuration B. PCI-DSS Standards C. Application Firewall Violations Summary D. Generate PCI-DSS Answer: D Explanation: Reference: https://docs.citrix.com/en-us/citrix-adc/current-release/application-firewall/stats-and-reports.html Question: 56 Scenario: A Citrix Engineer is monitoring the environment with Citrix Application Delivery Management (ADM). Management has asked for a report of high-risk traffic to protected internal websites. Which dashboard can the engineer use to generate the requested report? A. App Security B. Transactions C. Users & Endpoints D. App Answer: B Question: 57 A Citrix Engineer wants to delegate management of Citrix Application Delivery Management (ADM) to a junior team member. Which assigned role will limit the team member to view all application-related data? A. readonly B. appReadonly C. admin D. appAdmin Answer: B Explanation: Reference: https://docs.citrix.com/en-us/citrix-application-delivery-management-service/setting-up/configuring-role- based-access-control.html Question: 58 A Citrix Engineer is reviewing the log files for a sensitive web application and notices that someone accessed the application using the engineers credentials while the engineer was out of the office for an extended period of time. Which production can the engineer implement to protect against this vulnerability? A. Deny URL B. Buffer Overflow C. Form Field Consistency D. Cookie Consistency Answer: C Question: 59 Which data populates the Events Dashboard? A. Syslog messages B. SNMP trap messages C. API calls D. AppFlow IPFIX records Answer: D Question: 60 Scenario: A Citrix Engineer configured signature protections for Citrix Web App Firewall. Signature Auto-Update has been enabled. Upon reviewing the log files, the engineer notices that the auto update process has an error. In the settings for Signature Auto Update the engineer notices that the URL is blank. Which URL should the engineer enter to restore the update process? A. https://s3.amazonaws.com/NSAppFwSignatures/SignaturesMapping.xml B. https://download.citrix.com/NSAppFwSignatures/SignaturesMapping.xml C. https://www.citrix.com/NSAppFwSignatures/SignaturesMapping.xml D. https://citrix.azure.com/NSAppFwSignatures/SignaturesMapping.xml Answer: A Explanation: Reference: https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX138858 For More exams visit https://killexams.com/vendors-exam-list | ||||||||
A proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit is released for the 'Citrix Bleed' vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2023-4966, that allows attackers to retrieve authentication session cookies from vulnerable Citrix NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway appliances. CVE-2023-4966 is a critical-severity remotely exploitable information disclosure flaw Citrix fixed on October 10 without providing many details. On October 17, Mandiant revealed that the flaw was abused as a zero-day in limited attacks since late August 2023. This Monday, Citrix issued a subsequent warning to administrators of NetScaler ADC and Gateway appliances, urging them to patch the flaw immediately, as the rate of exploitation has started to pick up. Today, researchers at Assetnote shared more details about the exploitation method of CVE-2023-4966 and published a PoC exploit on GitHub to demonstrate their findings and help those who want to test for exposure. The Citrix Bleed flawThe CVE-2023-4966 Citrix Bleed flaw is an unauthenticated buffer-related vulnerability affecting Citrix NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway, network devices used for load balancing, firewall implementation, traffic management, VPN, and user authentication. By analyzing the unpatched (13.1-48.47) and patched versions (13.1-49.15) of NetScaler, Assetnote found 50 function changes. Among these functions, the researchers found two ('ns_aaa_oauth_send_openid_config' and 'ns_aaa_oauthrp_send_openid_config') that featured additional bounds checks preceding the generation of a response. These functions use 'snprintf' to insert the appropriate data into the generated JSON payload for the OpenID configuration. In the pre-patch version, the response is sent immediately without checks. The vulnerability emerges from the return value of the snprintf function, which can lead to a buffer over-read if exploited. The patched version ensures that a response will only be sent if snprintf returns a value lower than 0x20000. Snatching session tokensArmed with that knowledge, Assetnote's analysts attempted to exploit vulnerable NetScaler endpoints. During that process, they found that the hostname value used for generating the payload comes from the HTTP Host header, so one does not need administrator rights to access it. Furthermore, the hostname is inserted into the payload six times. Hence, its exploitation makes it possible to exceed the buffer limit, forcing the endpoint to respond with the buffer's contents and adjacent memory. "We could clearly see a lot of leaked memory immediately following the JSON payload," explains Assetnote in the report. "While a lot of it was null bytes, there was some suspicious-looking information in the response." By exploiting the vulnerability thousands of times for testing, the analysts consistently located a 32-65 byte long hex string that is a session cookie. Retrieving that cookie makes it possible for attackers to hijack accounts and gain unrestricted access to vulnerable appliances. Now that a CVE-2023-4966 exploit is publicly available, it is expected that threat actors will increase their targeting of Citrix Netscaler devices to gain initial access to corporate networks. Threat monitoring service Shadowserver reports spikes of exploitation attempts following the publication of Assetnote's PoC, so the malicious activity has already started. As these types of vulnerabilities are commonly used for ransomware and data theft attacks, it is strongly advised that system administrators immediately deploy patches to resolve the flaw. Earlier this month another vulnerability was found in Citrix Systems Inc.âs NetScaler and NetGateway product lines. This time around, the Citrix Bleed exploit is a lot more dangerous and harder to snuff out. In July and August, about 2,000 NetScalers were exploited by a threat actor to get persistent access. NetScaler and NetGateway perform a variety of network security functions, including load balancing, application firewalls and proxy services. The Citrix Bleed exploit allows attackers to retrieve session cookies to gain unauthorized access. The company announced patches on Oct. 10 for several versions, with the exception of v12.1, which is still vulnerable and considered past its end of life. But then other issues were discovered. Last week saw further definition of the scope of the problem. Google LLCâs Mandiant research group found another vulnerability that wasnât fixed with these patches. Other researchers, including Assetnote, found the exploit happening in their telemetry since August and issued a proof-of-concept example. This can be used as a demonstration, as well as a mechanism for network administrators to test their systems. Assetnote had further technical details that show how the exploit works. Mandiant found instances where the exploit was used to infiltrate the infrastructure of government entities and technology corporations, and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency added the exploit and warnings to federal agencies. Mandiant and Citrix both issued warnings to those that havenât yet patched their systems to do so as soon as possible. Greynoise, another security researcher, indicated that more than a dozen unique IP addresses were still unpatched as of the weekend, according to data they extracted from their own telemetry. Session cookie-based attacks have been in the news most recently, because they make it easier for hackers to breech systems without having to find and steal login credentials. Theyâre also useful because the cookies are designed to persist after any reboots of the equipment, and in some cases the initial patches offered by the vendors donât take this into account. A similar set of session cookie attacks were behind a series aimed at Cisco Systems Inc. IOS devices earlier in the month. Photo: CitrixYour vote of support is important to us and it helps us keep the content FREE.One-click below supports our mission to provide free, deep and relevant content. ÂJoin our community on YouTubeJoin the community that includes more than 15,000 #CubeAlumni experts, including Amazon.com CEO Andy Jassy, Dell Technologies founder and CEO Michael Dell, Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger and many more luminaries and experts.
THANK YOU A critical vulnerability tracked as CVE-2023-4966 in Citrix NetScaler ADC/Gateway devices has been actively exploited as a zero-day since late August, security researchers announced. The security issue is an information disclosure and received a fix last week. It allows attackers to access secrets in appliances configured as gateways of authentication, authorization, and accounting (AAA) virtual servers. In a security bulletin on October 10 with few technical details, Citrix strongly urged customers to install the available update without delay. A report from Mandiant disclosed that it found signs of CVE-2023-4966 being exploited in the wild since August for stealing authentication sessions and hijacking accounts. "Mandiant has identified zero-day exploitation of this vulnerability in the wild beginning in late August 2023," says the cybersecurity company. "Successful exploitation could result in the ability to hijack existing authenticated sessions, therefore bypassing multifactor authentication or other strong authentication requirements" - Mandiant The company also warns that hijacked sessions persist even after installing the security update. Depending on the permissions of the hijacked account, the attackers may leverage the method to move laterally or to breach more accounts. Security researchers observed CVE-2023-4966 being exploited for access on infrastructure belonging to government organizations and technology companies. Apart from applying the patch from Citrix, Mandiant published a document with additional remediation recommendations for NetScaler ADC/Gateway administrators with the following suggestions:
Also, upgrading the appliances to the following firmware versions should be prioritized:
This is the second zero-day flaw Citrix fixes in its products this year. A previous one, identified as CVE-2023-3519, was exploited in the wild in early July and received a fix a few of weeks later. A critical security vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler patched last week is under active attack â and has been since at least August. Making matters worse, the bug (CVE-2023-4966, CVSS score 9.4), can't be fully remediated by simply applying the patch, Mandiant warns. To that point, "organizations should ... terminate all active sessions," Mandiant CTO Charles Carmakal explained in a LinkedIn post on the active Citrix exploitation this week. "These authenticated sessions will persist after the update to mitigate CVE-2023-4966 has been deployed. Therefore, even after the patch is applied, a threat actor could use stolen session data to authenticate to resources until the sessions are terminated." Technically an information-disclosure vulnerability, the flaw allows cyberattackers to hijack existing authenticated sessions and potentially bypass multifactor authentication (MFA). The result is full control over NetScaler environments, which control and manage application delivery within enterprises. Mandiant has traced attacks exploiting the bug back to late summer, carried out by an unknown threat actor. Carmakal said that the ongoing exploitation appears focused on cyberespionage, with professional services, technology, and government organizations so far in the unknown attackers' sights. "We anticipate other threat actors with financial motivations will exploit this over time," he added. That's a likely prediction given that organizations have a poor track record when it comes to mitigating known threats against Citrix gear. For instance, earlier in the month it came to light that legions of attackers are still targeting CVE-2023-3519 (CVSS score of 9.8), a critical pre-authentication remote code-execution (RCE) vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler gateways that was addressed in July (but exploited as a zero-day for a month before that). Thousands of credential-theft attacks ensued after the disclosure, cresting in August as patching lagged. As of early October, according to the Shadowserver Foundation, more than 1,300 backdoored NetScaler instances were still appearing in scans. As far as the latest critical security bug goes, customer-managed Citrix NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway installations are affected; cloud instances are not, as outlined in the Citrix bug advisory, which also includes information about patched versions. Mandiant on Wednesday also offered updated, detailed remediation guidance for CVE-2023-4966. ![]() Getty Images
A vulnerability that allows attackers to bypass multifactor authentication and access enterprise networks using hardware sold by Citrix is under mass exploitation by ransomware hackers despite a patch being available for three weeks. Citrix Bleed, the common name for the vulnerability, carries a severity rating of 9.4 out of a possible 10, a relatively high designation for a mere information-disclosure bug. The reason: the information disclosed can include session tokens, which the hardware assigns to devices that have already successfully provided credentials, including those providing MFA. The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2023-4966 and residing in Citrixâs NetScaler Application Delivery Controller and NetScaler Gateway, has been under active exploitation since August. Citrix issued a patch on October 10.Repeat: This is not a drillAttacks have only ramped up recently, prompting security researcher Kevin Beaumont on Saturday to declare: âThis vulnerability is now under mass exploitation.â He went on to say, âFrom talking to multiple organizations, they are seeing widespread exploitation.â He said that as of Saturday, he had found an estimated 20,000 instances of exploited Citrix devices where session tokens had been stolen. He said his estimate was based on running a honeypot of servers that masquerade as vulnerable Netscaler devices to track opportunistic attacks on the Internet. Beaumont then compared those results with other data, including some provided by Netflow and the Shodan search engine. Meanwhile, GreyNoise, a security company that also deploys honeypots, was showing exploits for CVE-2023-4966 coming from 135 IP addresses when this post went live on Ars. Thatâs a 27-fold increase from the five IPs spotted GreyNoise saw five days ago. The most latest numbers available from security organization Shadowserver showed that there were roughly 5,500 unpatched devices. Beaumont has acknowledged that the estimate is at odds with his estimate of 20,000 compromised devices. Itâs not immediately clear what was causing the discrepancy. The vulnerability is relatively easy for experienced people to exploit. A simple reverse-engineering of the patch Citrix released shows the functions that are vulnerable, and from there, itâs not hard to write code that exploits them. Making attacks even easier, a handful of proof-of-concept exploits are available online. In a detailed technical analysis, researchers from Assetnote wrote: The name Citrix Bleed is an allusion to Heartbleed, a different critical information disclosure vulnerability that turned the Internet on its head in 2014. That vulnerability, which resided in the OpenSSL code library, came under mass exploitation and allowed the pilfering of passwords, encryption keys, banking credentials, and all kinds of other sensitive information. Citrix Bleed isnât as dire because there are fewer vulnerable devices in use. But Citrix Bleed is still plenty bad. Organizations should consider all Netscaler devices to have been compromised. This means patching any remaining unpatched devices. Then, all credentials should be rotated to ensure any session tokens that might have been leaked are invalidated. Last, organizations should inspect their devices and infrastructure for signs of compromise. Security firm Mandiant has in-depth security guidance here. ![]() Getty Images
A critical vulnerability that hackers have exploited since August, which allows them to bypass multifactor authentication in Citrix networking hardware, has received a patch from the manufacturer. Unfortunately, applying it isnât enough to protect affected systems. The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2023-4966 and carrying a severity rating of 9.8 out of a possible 10, resides in the NetScaler Application Delivery Controller and NetScaler Gateway, which provide load balancing and single sign-on in enterprise networks, respectively. Stemming from a flaw in a currently unknown function, the information-disclosure vulnerability can be exploited so hackers can intercept encrypted communications passing between devices. The vulnerability can be exploited remotely and with no human action required, even when attackers have no system privileges on a vulnerable system. Citrix released a patch for the vulnerability last week, along with an advisory that provided few details. On Wednesday, researchers from security firm Mandiant said that the vulnerability has been under active exploitation since August, possibly for espionage against professional services, technology, and government organizations. Mandiant warned that patching the vulnerability wasnât sufficient to lock down affected networks because any sessions hijacked before the security update would persist afterward. The company wrote:
Mandiant provided security guidance that goes well beyond the advice Citrix provided. Specifically:
The advice is warranted given the track record from previous exploitation of critical Citrix vulnerabilities. For example, Citrix disclosed and released a patch for a separate 9.8 vulnerability on July 18. Three days later, according to Internet scans by security organization Shadowserver, more than 18,000 instances had yet to apply the critical update. By then, according to the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Administration, the vulnerability was already under active exploit. In the subsequent weeks, Shadowserver and security firms F-Secure and IBM Security Intelligence tracked thousands of exploitations used for credential theft. What Mandiantâs guidance amounts to is this: If your organization uses either NetScaler ADC or NetScaler Gateway that's on-premises, you should assume it has been hacked and follow the guidance provided. And yes, that includes patching first. Pediatric Research adheres to Springer Natureâs Data Policy Type 3. This means that a submission to Pediatric Research implies that materials described in the manuscript, including all relevant raw data, will be freely available to any researcher wishing to use them for non-commercial purposes, without breaching participant confidentiality. It also means that a Data Availability Statement (see below for more details) is required by the journal. Data Policy DetailsThe journal strongly encourages that all datasets on which the conclusions of the paper rely should be available to readers. We encourage authors to ensure that their datasets are either deposited in publicly available repositories (where available and appropriate) or presented in the main manuscript or additional supporting files whenever possible. Please see Springer Natureâs information on recommended repositories. General repositories â for all types of research data â such as figshare and Dryad may be used where appropriate. Where a widely established research community expectation for data archiving in public repositories exists, submission to a community-endorsed, public repository is mandatory*. Persistent identifiers (such as DOIs and accession numbers) for relevant datasets must be provided in the paper. *For the following types of data set, submission to a community-endorsed, public repository is mandatory: Data Availability StatementAs part of the Pediatric Research Data Availability Policies, all original articles must include a Data Availability Statement. Data availability statements should include information on where data supporting the results reported in the article can be found including, where applicable, hyperlinks to publicly archived datasets analysed or generated during the study. By data we mean the minimal dataset that would be necessary to interpret, replicate and build upon the findings reported in the article. We recognise it is not always possible to share research data publicly, for instance when individual privacy could be compromised, and in such instances data availability should still be stated in the manuscript along with any conditions for access. Data Availability statements can take one of the following forms (or a combination of more than one if required for multiple datasets):
Photo: Topology Optimization and Tailored Fiber Placement used to stiffen an aerospace wing bulkhead. Optimization generates a 15% stiffness increase at 44% weight savings for the bulkhead back panel, compared to quasi-isotropic composite laminates. Composite Optimization CapabilityUDRI offers a suite of in-house tools for design of composite structures and devices. These algorithms attempt to minimize a user-defined objective, while considering any relevant design constraints. Both gradient-based and genetic algorithm optimizations are available, and are tightly coupled with UDRI analysis and manufacturing capability. This allows UDRI to go from problem definition, to an optimized and validated design, to a fabricated composite structure. The result is lighter, stiffer structures and the potential for subsystem integration through multifunctional materials. Optimization for Tailored Fiber Placement (TFP) CompositesA gradient-based optimization algorithm provides optimal topology and fiber alignment for Tailored Fiber Placement composites. The algorithm generates minimum-compliance designs for single or multiple load cases, greatly expanding attainable design space when compared to quasi-isotropic composite laminates. Optimization output provides options for selective reinforcement of traditional thin-walled structures, or for fully dense replacements of traditionally manufactured parts. Figure 1. Optimization trade of a TFP-optimized panel vs. a unidirectional panel. Figure 2. Fully dense panel, 2x as stiff as a unidirectional panel of the same weight. Manufactured using ICOMAT FibreSteer. Optimization using process variablesUsing material characterization techniques, UDRI develops a continuous, differentiable model for a controllable manufacturing process, such as variation in fiber alignment as a function of print speed. This model then feeds the gradient-based optimization in order to determine the best structure. Including the process model in the design significantly reduces post-processing design time and design-to-part defects.  Figure 3. Seifert, David Ryan, Andrew Abbott, and Jeffery Baur. "Topology and alignment optimization of additively manufactured, fiber-reinforced composites." Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 63.6 (2021): 2673-2683. Multifunctional Topology OptimizationUDRI offers multiphysics design using in-house FEM and sensitivity algorithms. Currently supporting electrostatics and piezoresistive mechanics and objectives, with capability for thermal and aeroelastic physics in progress. The algorithm is able to balance load carrying capability with the secondary function to arrive at a suite of optimal topologies for a given range of performance targets. Figure 4. Seifert, Ryan, Mayuresh Patil, and Gary Seidel. "Topology optimization of self-sensing nanocomposite structures with designed boundary conditions." Smart Materials and Structures 28.7 (2019): 074006. Genetic Optimization of Composite Damage SpecimensUsing UDRIâs BSAM composite damage FEM software, a NSGA-II genetic algorithm performs shape optimization to tailor a tensile specimen for a targeted failure mode. This removes the need for the complicated test fixtures typically required to characterize many composite damage modes. Figure 5. Geise, Luke, et al. "Harnessing shape optimization techniques to develop novel methods to determine shear properties in PMCs." Computational Materials Science 200 (2021): 110782. Figure 6. BSAM analysis confirms that the optimized design experiences shear failure in the target area.  For more information: Scott Huelskamp HONG KONGâCloud Software Group, which owns enterprise-software brand Citrix, is ceasing business transactions in China, becoming the latest U.S. company to pull back from China.In an email to clients and partners on Monday seen by The Wall Street Journal, Cloud Software Group said it has made the decision to cease all new commercial transactions in China, including Hong Kong, on Dec. 3. It cited rising costs in the market. Copyright Š2023 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8 (MENAFN- EIN Presswire) Network Optimization Services Market Increasing number of data center , growth in usage of IP video & virtualization and network optimization as cloud services are driving market growth. PORTLAND, PORTLAND, OR, UNITED STATE, November 8, 2023 /EINPresswire / -- Allied Market Research published a new report, titled, " The USD 9.78 Billion Network Optimization Services Market Hit by 2028 | Top Players such as - Infovista, Citrix and Netscout." The report offers an extensive analysis of key growth strategies, drivers, opportunities, key segment, Porter's Five Forces analysis, and competitive landscape. This study is a helpful source of information for market players, investors, VPs, stakeholders, and new entrants to gain thorough understanding of the industry and determine steps to be taken to gain competitive advantage. The global network optimization services market size was valued at USD 3,040 million in 2020, and is projected to reach USD 9,784 million by 2028, registering a CAGR of 16.1% from 2021 to 2028. Request demo Report (Get Full Insights in PDF â 358 Pages) at: Advancements in network infrastructure and demand for VoIP Services across enterprises drive the growth of the global network optimization services market. However, considerable leaps in WAN and RAN optimization technology hinder market growth. On the other hand, surge in the number of production facilities that Excellerate the control of the establishment of network and information technology solutions & services present new opportunities in the coming years. The network optimization services market is segmented into service, application, organization size, and industry vertical. Based on service, the market is divided into implementation, consulting, and support & maintenance. Based on application, the market is fragmented into local network optimization, WAN optimization, RAN optimization, and data center optimization. Based on organization size, the market is bifurcated into small & medium enterprise and large enterprise. Based on industry vertical, network optimization services market is classified into banking, financial services, & insurance, telecom, government and defense, transportation and logistics, travel and tourism, manufacturing, consumer goods and retail, media and entertainment, energy and utility, healthcare and life sciences, education, and information technology (IT). If you have any questions, Please feel free to contact our analyst at: Based on application, the WAN optimization segment held the largest market share, accounting for around half of the global network optimization services market in 2020, and is expected to maintain its dominance in terms of revenue during the forecast period. However, the RAN optimization segment is expected to manifest the highest CAGR of 18.2% from 2021 to 2028. Based on service, the implementation segment accounted for the highest market share in 2020, contributing to more than two-fifths of the total share, and is estimated to maintain its leadership status during the forecast period. However, the consulting segment is expected to witness the largest CAGR of 18.1% from 2021 to 2028. Enquiry Before Buying: Based on region, North America contributed to the highest share in 2020, holding nearly two-fifths of the total market, and is estimated to continue its lead position by 2028. However, Asia-Pacific is expected to portray the fastest CAGR of 17.9% during the forecast period. Leading players of the global network optimization services market analyzed in the research include Solarwinds, Huawei, Cisco Systems, ZTE, Nokia Corporation, Citrix, Infovista, Fatpipe Networks, Circadence, and Netscout Systems. Buy Now & Get Exclusive Discount on this Report (358 Pages PDF with Insights, Charts, Tables, and Figures) at: Impact of Covid-19 on Network Optimization Services Market (Pre and Post Analysis) â There has been increase in demand for network optimization services from government agencies and policymakers to implement AI systems, big data analytics, and data analysis software to monitor the spread in real-time, make predictions, and classify Covid-19 treatment drugs. â Many businesses opted for aâwork from homeâ culture and they employed best measures to ensure optimal performance and security of their network infrastructure due to increase in network threats such as data breaches and hacking. Thanks for practicing this article, you can also get an individual chapter-wise section or region-wise report versions like North America, Europe, or Asia. If you have any special requirements, please let us know and we will offer you the report as per your requirements. Lastly, this report provides market intelligence most comprehensively. The report structure has been kept such that it offers maximum business value. It provides critical insights into the market dynamics and will enable strategic decision-making for the existing market players as well as those willing to enter the market. About Us: Allied Market Research (AMR) is a market research and business-consulting firm of Allied Analytics LLP, based in Portland, Oregon. AMR offers market research reports, business solutions, consulting services, and insights on markets across 11 industry verticals. Adopting extensive research methodologies, AMR is instrumental in helping its clients to make strategic business decisions and achieve sustainable growth in their market domains. We are equipped with skilled analysts and experts and have a wide experience of working with many Fortune 500 companies and small & medium enterprises. Pawan Kumar, the CEO of Allied Market Research, is leading the organization toward providing high-quality data and insights. We are in professional corporate relations with various companies. This helps us dig out market data that helps us generate accurate research data tables and confirm utmost accuracy in our market forecasting. Every data company in the domain is concerned. Our secondary data procurement methodology includes deep presented in the reports published by us is extracted through primary interviews with top officials from leading online and offline research and discussion with knowledgeable professionals and analysts in the industry. David Correa MENAFN07112023003118003196ID1107390129 Legal Disclaimer: | ||||||||
1Y0-341 basics | 1Y0-341 exam | 1Y0-341 health | 1Y0-341 test | 1Y0-341 test Questions | 1Y0-341 outline | 1Y0-341 pdf | 1Y0-341 exam | 1Y0-341 test Questions | 1Y0-341 information source | | ||||||||
Killexams test Simulator Killexams Questions and Answers Killexams Exams List Search Exams |