Here are updated and valid real questions to pass 050-730 exam proposes you should endeavor its 100 percent free Exam Cram test. You will actually want to download VCE test system and introduce to your PC to rehearse 050-730 dumps. We offer you three months of free updates of 050-730 Certified Novell Identity Manager Administrator bootcamp questions and practice tests. Our group remains refreshing the 050-730 exam prep from genuine inquiries constantly.

050-730 Certified Novell Identity Manager Administrator questions |

050-730 questions - Certified Novell Identity Manager Administrator Updated: 2024

Get Excellent Marks in 050-730 test with these dumps
Exam Code: 050-730 Certified Novell Identity Manager Administrator questions January 2024 by team

050-730 Certified Novell Identity Manager Administrator

Test Detail:
The Novell 050-730 certification exam, also known as Certified Novell Identity Manager Administrator, validates the knowledge and skills of individuals in managing and administering Novell Identity Manager. Here is a detailed overview of the 050-730 certification, including the number of questions and time, course outline, test objectives, and test syllabus.

Number of Questions and Time:
The exact number of questions and time allotted for the 050-730 certification may vary. However, typically, the test consists of multiple-choice and scenario-based questions that assess the candidate's understanding of Novell Identity Manager concepts and administration tasks. The duration of the test may vary, but it is typically completed within a specified time limit, such as 90 minutes.

Course Outline:
The 050-730 certification course covers a comprehensive range of syllabus related to Novell Identity Manager administration. The specific course outline may include the following components:

1. Introduction to Novell Identity Manager:
- Overview of identity management and Novell Identity Manager
- Key concepts and components of Novell Identity Manager
- Architecture and deployment options
- Integration with other systems and directories

2. Installation and Configuration:
- Pre-installation requirements and planning
- Installation and initial configuration of Novell Identity Manager
- Configuration of drivers, connectors, and connectors sets
- Identity Vault setup and configuration

3. Identity Manager Administration:
- User and role management
- Policy management and provisioning rules
- Workflow and approval processes
- Auditing and reporting

4. Synchronization and Integration:
- Directory synchronization
- User and group synchronization
- Connector configuration and management
- Integration with external systems and applications

5. Troubleshooting and Maintenance:
- Troubleshooting common issues and errors
- Log analysis and diagnostics
- Backup and restore procedures
- Performance tuning and optimization

Exam Objectives:
The objectives of the 050-730 certification test are to assess the candidate's knowledge and understanding of Novell Identity Manager administration tasks and best practices. The specific objectives include:

- Evaluating the candidate's understanding of Novell Identity Manager architecture and deployment options.
- Assessing the candidate's knowledge of installation and configuration procedures.
- Testing the candidate's proficiency in user and role management, policy management, and provisioning rules.
- Evaluating the candidate's ability to troubleshoot common issues and perform maintenance tasks.

Exam Syllabus:
The 050-730 test syllabus outlines the specific syllabus and subtopics that will be covered in the exam. The syllabus may include:

- Introduction to Novell Identity Manager
- Installation and configuration
- User and role management
- Policy management and provisioning rules
- Workflow and approval processes
- Troubleshooting and maintenance

It is important to note that the specific content and format of the 050-730 certification test may vary based on the certification provider or organization offering the certification. It is recommended to refer to the official 050-730 certification program website or authorized training providers for the most up-to-date and detailed information regarding the specific 050-730 certification test you are planning to take.
Certified Novell Identity Manager Administrator
Novell Administrator questions

Other Novell exams

050-694 ZENworks 7 Desktop Management Administration
050-696 Foundations of Novell Open Enterprise Server NetWare
050-701 Upgrading to Novell Open Enterprise Server for NetWare
050-708 SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 Administration
050-710 Novell Certified Linux Administrator
050-720 Novell Certified Linux Administrator 11
050-730 Certified Novell Identity Manager Administrator
050-886 Foundation of Novell Networking: NetWare 6.5
050-890 Advanced Novell Network Management;Netware 6.5
050-894 Novell ZENworks 7 Desktop Management Administrator
50-695 Novell eDirectory Design and Implementation:eDirectory 8.8

We offer valid and updated 050-730 050-730 real test mock test that are required to pass 050-730 exam. The best source of 050-730 dumps is that has its experts working to update and validate 050-730 dumps all the time to meet the Test Center requirement of candidates.
Certified Novell Identity Manager(R) Administrator
E. They are used to define Global Configuration Values.
Answer: A, B
Question: 109
Which is most commonly used to access ECMAScript?
A. iMonitor
B. iManager
C. Expression Builder
D. User Application Manager
E. Directory Abstraction Layer (DAL)
Answer: C
Question: 110
The Roles Based Provisioning Module includes a read-only Role Approval workflow.
Which option does this Role Approval workflow support? (Choose 2.)
A. The ability to display the role using localized display names
B. The ability to process SoD conflicts in either serial or quorum mode
C. The ability to process role approvals in either serial or quorum mode
D. The retrieval of SoD approver DNs from the request object (nrfRequest)
E. E-mail notification to all approvers per SoD conflict found for SoD workflow
Answer: A, C
Question: 111
When using the Role Mapping Administrator to create a new role, you will need to
select a level for the role. Which level defines lower-level privileges?
A. IT Role
B. Mapping Role
C. Systems Role
D. Business Role
E. Permission Role
Answer: E
Question: 112
Given the XML Document below:

Novell, Inc.

dn="\DA- TREE\DA\USERS\E123456" src-entry-id="34042" from-merge="true">


Frank Jones



Within the Policy Builder Rule Conditions, what value will the XPATH Statement
"@from- merge='true'" return?
A. null
B. true
C. false
D. error
E. success
Answer: B
Question: 113
In which order does the metadirectory engine apply policies?
A. 1) Matching policy 2) Placement policy 3) Creation policy
B. 1) Matching policy 2) Creation policy 3) Placement policy
C. 1) Creation policy 2) Placement policy 3) Matching policy
D. 1) Creation policy 2) Matching policy 3) Placement policy
E. 1) Placement policy 2) Creation policy 3) Matching policy
F. 1) Placement policy 2) Matching policy 3) Creation policy
Answer: B
Question: 114
Which statement is true regarding the output that DSTrace generates?
A. Each policy can have only one rule.
B. Each rule is processed multiple times per event.
C. Rules will only be executed if their condition logic evaluates to be true.
D. IDM engine trace levels 0 through 3 show policies as they are being applied.
Answer: C
Question: 115
Which connected systems support bidirectional password synchronization? (Choose 3.)
A. PeopleSoft
B. Lotus Notes
C. JDBC databases
E. Novell eDirectory
F. Microsoft Active Directory
G. Network Information Services (NIS)
Answer: E, F, G
Question: 116
Which user type works with the User Applications Identity Self-Service, Work
Dashboard, and Roles and Resource tabs and has no administrative permissions?
A. Designers
B. Team Manager
C. Business Users
D. Domain Manager
Answer: C
Question: 117
Which statement is true regarding regular expressions?
A. Must be case sensitive
B. Can match entire string
C. Cannot use wildcard characters
D. Cannot be changed by escape characters
Answer: B
For More exams visit
Kill your test at First Attempt....Guaranteed!

Novell Administrator questions - BingNews Search results Novell Administrator questions - BingNews Structured Interview Questions for a Contract Administrator

Jan Simon is a career and life coach with more than 20 years of experience in corporate human resources. She holds a bachelor's degree from Central Michigan University. Simon enjoys writing career articles and is a columnist for the CV Weekly. She also publishes a weekly blog called Life on the Sunny Side.

Tue, 17 Jul 2018 08:55:00 -0500 en-US text/html
Essential Questions to Ask When Choosing a Nursing Home No result found, try new keyword!While many of the questions you’ll have can be adequately answered by the nursing home’s administrator or sales team, it’s also important to spend some time chatting with other folks at the ... Wed, 06 Dec 2023 21:50:00 -0600 Frequently Asked Questions

Continuing medical education (CME) consists of educational activities which serve to maintain, develop, or increase the knowledge, skills, and professional performance as well as relationships that a physician uses to provide services for patients, the public, or the profession. The content of CME is that body of knowledge and skills generally recognized and accepted by the profession as within the basic medical sciences, the discipline of clinical medicine, and the provision of health care to the public.

Core requirements for certifying an activity for AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™:
  1. Must conform to AMA's definition of CME;
  2. Address demonstrated educational needs;
  3. Communicate to prospective participants a clearly identified educational purpose and/or objectives in advance of participation in the activity;
  4. Be designed using approved learning formats (Live, Enduring Materials, etc.);
  5. Present content appropriate in depth and scope for the intended audience;
  6. Be nonpromotional in nature and planned in accordance with the ACCME's Standards for Commercial Support;
  7. Evaluate the effectiveness in achieving its educational purpose and/or objectives;
  8. Document credits claimed;
  9. Be certified in advance of the activity (an activity may not be retroactively approved for credit); and
  10. Include the AMA Credit Designation Statement in any promotional materials. Credit is awarded hour-for-hour and a physician can only claim the amount of time they spent in the activity.

CME Application Questions

A "professional practice gap" can be defined as the difference between processes or outcomes observed in practice, and those potentially achievable. Said another way, a gap can be expressed as the difference between what actually occurs and what ought to occur. The educational planning process begins by identifying the "practice gaps" of your own learners. Professional practice is not limited to clinical, patient care practice, but can also include, for example, research practice or administrative practice.

Ask yourself: Why does the gap or problem exist? What are the underlying needs or causes of the gap that should be addressed? Does the problem or gap exist because there is a knowledge deficit (learners don’t know something), a competency problem (learners don’t have methods or strategies to do something) or a performance deficit (learners don’t execute the methods or strategies resulting in sub-optimal behavior)? Or some combination of causes? Describe how the gap or problem was analyzed. What sources and kinds of information did you use to determine the cause of the gap or problem? Your analysis of the causes of the gaps is your needs assessment and must link to the sources you have included with the application.

CME activities are designed to increase physician competency, influence physician behavior and /or Excellerate patient outcomes. After you have identified the gap or problem and determined the causes, you must decide the goals you want to achieve. What is the desired level of change in your learners you are striving for? How can the CME activity be designed to produce the changes in competence, performance or patient outcomes you want?

The American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) have determined that there are 10 critical competencies that physicians must master in order to provide optimal clinical care. Determine which of the competencies is relevant to the gap or problem you have identified and that the CME activity will address. Integrate the competency into your educational design.

You want to create content and format that promotes improvements or quality in healthcare.  CME activities cannot promote proprietary interests of commercial interests. How will you ensure that all decisions concerning the activity (needs, objectives, content, faculty, methods, etc.) are free from the influence or control of commercial interests? How will you ensure that faculty present education that is fair, unbiased and non-promotional? Identifying relevant financial relationships, resolving conflicts of interest, disclosure to learners, and appropriate management of commercial support contribute to ensuring the independence of the CME activity.

Scope of practice refers to the rational link between the content of the activity and what the learners or target audience are reasonably expected to be doing in the type of professional practices they have.

Identified gaps and desired results should be considered before the learning objectives and educational content are developed. Learning objectives represent the translation of identified practice gaps into relevant educational goals. Planners should develop and present learning objectives to speakers and faculty, not vice versa. Well thought out objectives serve as a guide to faculty so that they can create content that will help the learners close their gaps. Objectives should contain action verbs and criteria that will help activity planners evaluate whether or not the gap was closed and if the activity improved competency, influenced behavior and/or improved patient outcomes.

Educational planners need to recognize why their learners have not been able to translate new knowledge, competence or performance into practice. Think about what factors can be identified to explain why the physician has not changed what they are doing. Educational planners need to consider addressing these barriers to change in their CME activities.

Formal CME activities are only one strategy that can be used to close the gaps of learners and affect learner change. Educational planners can include support strategies and additional resources as an adjunct to the educational activity that may further help close the gaps of learners. These tactics go beyond the educational activity or intervention.

The current CME application fee is $1,000. Direct any additional questions regarding application fees to your CME specialist.

Commercial Support

Commercial Support is financial, or in-kind, contributions given by a commercial interest, which is used to pay all or part of the costs of a CME activity. (Examples: meals, speaker honoraria or travel expenses, meeting space, etc.).
UAB has very strict rules regarding commercial support of CME activities.  If you are considering or intending to use commercial support for your activity, please contact the Division of CME prior to submitting your application to make certain your activity is in compliance with both UAB and ACCME commercial support standards. More information is available in our Help Files.

You will need to make a direct request to the commercial company. but first, you must review our Help Files on standards for commercial support and attest that you understand and will abide by all requirements.

Commercial support must be acknowledged on your publicity and at your event. The wording to use to acknowledge commercial support should be "We gratefully acknowledge an unrestricted educational grant from ...".

No, a commercial support company should never be listed as a sponsor of an activity. They can only be listed as a "supporter".

Yes. The most updated certification statement needs to be listed on any promotional material. If you receive commercial support, it must also be acknowledged.  Please send a copy of the promotional materials to your CME specialist for review prior to publication.

Ensure that all planners and presenters are familiar with our clinical content validation policy.

Commercial Support Letter of Agreement

A LOA is a written agreement specifying the terms, conditions, and purposes of the commercial support awarded by a commercial entity to a provider. All commercial support, both monetary and in-kind, requires a LOA with signature by UAB (at the University-level, not the department level) and signature by the supporting company. All support must be disclosed in writing to participants prior to the educational activity. A copy of the signed LOA should be dated and received in the CME office prior to the live program date or enduring format release date.

You can request one from the CME office and we will either email or fax it to you.

No, the LOA must be fully executed through Grants and Contracts in the University.

We need a copy of the fully executed LOA, after all signatures, before the activity begins.

Lunch is an "in kind" contribution and should be noted on the form under "Program Expenses".

Financial Disclosure

All individuals who are in a position to control the content of an educational activity are required to disclose all relevant financial relationships in any amount occurring within the past 24 months related both to content and to commercial supporters of the activity.  An individual must disclose to learners any relevant financial relationship(s), including the following information: name of the individual, name of the commercial interest(s) and nature of the relationship the person has with each commercial interest.  For an individual with no relevant financial relationship(s), the learners must be informed that no relevant financial relationship(s) exist.

A financial disclosure form must be completed by anyone who is in the position to control the content of an educational activity. This means that we definitely need a signed form from the speaker, regardless of degree, training, expertise, faculty or nonfaculty status, external or internal to UAB, etc. and anyone else who has any control of the content of the presentation.

Every speaker must sign a form at least once a year (prior to the first presentation) and then as appropriate if any of the information changes within the year. The planner and/or faculty member in charge of the series should also complete a form.  All disclosure forms must be uploaded to the file.

Faxed forms are acceptable, as are emailed forms.

You will need to re-contact the speaker to clarify whether or not they have anything to disclose. We can't assume that they do not have anything to disclose, just because nothing was checked.

The results MUST be shared with the audience. This can be done in a number of ways: written on the top of each sign-in sheet; posted next to the sign-in sheet; posted as the first or an introductory slide on the screen. For live, one offering activities; your CME specialist will also provide a disclosure summary to provide learners.

A provider must disclose the above information to learners prior to the beginning of the educational activity.

No, you must upload them to the online file before the presentation. The CME office also needs the evidence that the disclosure was made to the audience and how the disclosure was made.

A Conflict of Interest Resolution must be completed for that presentation by the activity director.  If the activity director is the one with the potential conflict, then the department/division director should complete the form.

Conflict of Interest

A conflict of interest is present when individuals in a position to control the content of CME (or their spouses/partners) have a relevant personal financial relationship with a commercial entity that benefits the individual and may ultimately bias the presentation of that content to colleagues and participants.
If a perceived conflict exists, it must be resolved by the completion of the conflict of interest form.

The current CME Application fee is $1,000. For any questions about application fees, please contact your CME specialist.

You will need to upload disclosures, flyers, and advertisements to the file for the activity on a regular basis prior to the session date.

For Regularly Scheduled Series (RSS), your our activity must now be re-certified once a year.  Certification is based on the academic year (July 1 - June 30).  You should receive a reminder to re-apply from your CME specialist.  For live, one offering activities; they must be certified at least 90 days before the activity begins.

Schedule Revisions

Yes, schedules and any changes should be uploaded to the activity file. You should also notify your CME specialist that a change has been made.

Program Evaluation

Quarterly for RSS activities.

Yes, you can send your evaluation forms to your CME specialist. A summary of the activity will be uploaded in the file.

Mon, 19 Sep 2022 08:01:00 -0500 en-US text/html
Online Evaluation FAQs

For Faculty

What questions are on the evaluation form?

Questions are selected by your department/program/school.  Both the "rating" answers (i.e., 5 being Excellent and 1 being poor) and the questions requiring a text answer are included.  The students simply receive an electronic copy instead of a scantron.

Can I add my own questions?

The online system does allow instructors to add additional questions for each course.  Information will be sent to each faculty member by email.  Faculty may add questions with a "rating" answer (5=Excellent; 1=Poor) or a written answer.  You should check with your department/program/school eval administrator if you would like further information on this option.

How will the online evaluation be administered?

The most important way to ensure a good response rate and receive thoughtful feedback from students is to communicate the importance of course evaluations to the success of our academic programs.  Students will receive several email communications from their respective Dean or Associate Dean. These emails stress the importance the university places on the course evaluations and explains the simple process for completion.  Students who do not complete upon the first prompt can receive up to 3 more prompts through the system.

In addition:

  • Faculty are encouraged to stress the various ways of accessing evaluations (Blackboard or myLaw, myWM, William & Mary Mobile App, or email link).
  • Faculty can encourage their students to complete the online evaluations.
  • Faculty may continue to set aside time during class when students can complete the evaluation. In selecting this method, faculty are asked to remind students to bring their laptops (or device of choice) to class on the scheduled evaluation day.
  • The evaluation window for all courses will be determined by each school or department/program.  During this period, students will receive notice that the evaluations are available and subsequent reminders. 

Will I be able to monitor response rates while the course evaluation is open for students?

Yes.  The faculty of record for each course can login to to review response rates while the evaluation is open.  Final response rates will be available through summary reports.  IMPORTANT NOTE:  Faculty will NOT be able to identify the status of any student or whether a particular student has completed the evaluation.

How will I know the evaluations for my courses are complete?

  • Faculty will receive an email indicating the reports are ready to be viewed.  Reports will be available after all grades are submitted.
  • Faculty can also view reports at, using your W&M Username and password to login.  Business faculty will also use their W&M Username - rather than their Mason username.

How do I save a copy of my course evaluation results?

Reports can be saved either as an HTML file or as a PDF.  Reports may also be printed directly from the web interface.

Who will have access to the results of my course evaluations?

There is no change in who can review faculty course evaluations in your school/department/program - Dean, Associate Dean, chairs/directors, and of course, you - the faculty member.  As in the past, the evaluations can be reviewed by the appropriate committee when a faculty member is up for tenure and/or promotion.

Who should I contact for support?

If you have trouble logging-in to the system, contact the Technology Support Center (TSC).  All other questions should be directed to the appropriate department/school/program eval administrator.


Contact the Technology Support Center (TSC)
757-221-4357 (HELP) | [[support]] | Monday - Friday, 8:00 am - 5:00 pm

Sat, 17 Oct 2020 23:57:00 -0500 en text/html
The Pension Money That EPO Employees Might Never See

posted by Roy Schestowitz on Jan 03, 2024,
updated Jan 03, 2024

Back to EPO...

Jan Boulanger: In your letter dated 25 May 2023 regarding the inward transfer of pension rights from the UK, you are raising several practical questions. Please find our answers outlined below.

THE EPO situation is being revisited (covered again) this month and yesterday we covered the lack of incentive to work hard. The management was dismantling the career system, which had historically been necessary to attract and retain high-calibre scientists (as examiners). The outcome, as one may predict, is loads of patent monopolies that should never have been allowed, including software patents, which ought not exist.

Yesterday we also relayed an old statement about the EPC (foundations of the EPO) turning 50. This establishment deteriorates rapidly and the media - what's left of it at least - no longer talks about it or very rarely talks about the issues.

Back in May the EPO's staff inquired about the pensions, perhaps irritated that they - or some portion of them - were outside the EU and inside the same system that had me and my colleague defrauded (I uncovered this around the same time). It was also around that time, or maybe a month earlier, that we kept discussing the pension system in the UK being in disarray and nobody held accountable for pension fraud. Even my MP was rebuffed and the municipality of London (a former large client) did not do anything about this matter. To them, perhaps (or so it would seem), pension fraud wasn't a big deal. Seeing how rampant corruption has been at the EPO (Benoît Battistelli and his friend António Campinos leveraged immunity to commit white-collar crimes), it would make staff more likely to be sceptical and wary. See "EPO May be Financially Defrauding the Public and Its Employees" (2019).

This past October the Central Staff Committee of the EPO wrote about "Inward transfer of pension rights from the United Kingdom," showing a "Reply from the administration" of the EPO. To quote:

Dear colleagues,

In a past publication we informed you about an open letter in which we sought the administration’s assistance in clarifying the status of the possibility of transferring pension rights from the United Kingdom.

During the summer we received a letter of reply. We thank the administration for their assistance.

The core part of it is a two-page letter from an administration that crushes the staff:

European Patent Office

80298 Munich


HR Essential Services

Jan Boulanger

Tel. +49 (0)89 2399 - 4320

Date: 20.07.2023

European Patent Office

Bob-van-Benthem-Platz 1

80469 Munich


European Patent Office | 80298 MUNICH | GERMANY

Central Staff Committee

European Patent Office

80298 Munich


Your letter dated 25 May 2023 with reference sc23062cl

Dear Mr Chair,

In your letter dated 25 May 2023 regarding the inward transfer of pension rights from the UK, you are raising several practical questions. Please find our answers outlined below.

The new pension scheme of the EPO allows transferring pension rights accrued under another pension scheme, provided that this scheme allows such transfer (Article 12 Old and New Pension Scheme).

The Office has never concluded a written agreement for transferring pension rights with the UK. For transferring UK pension rights without exit taxation towards overseas pension providers such as the new pension scheme of the EPO, these schemes need to fulfil certain conditions and self-register with His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC). For non-qualifying schemes, HMRC imposes at least 40% exit tax before the pension transfer, making it less attractive.

The EPO was registered as Qualifying Recognised Overseas Pension Scheme (QROPS) up to April 2015. Because of doubts surrounding the compatibility of our scheme’s severance grant provision and minimum retirement age, the Office did not continue its QROPS status between 2015 and 2019. Despite the EPO not being QROPS within the said period, the possibility to request a transfer under the statutory deadlines continued to exist. Indeed, three staff requested UK transfers during 2015-2018 which could however not be completed at the time, but have since then been re-launched.

In August 2019 the EPO registered anew as QROPS following changes in UK legislation regarding schemes of international organisations. This

registration does not differentiate transfers from both UK pension pillars: the UK state pension and private pensions. It is however to be noted that the EPO never received any funds from the UK state pension (so called first pillar).

From 2019 to date, the Office received fifteen new requests from staff members to transfer their pension rights from the UK. For completeness, the three previous cases of inward transfers from private pension funds were completed, while several others are pending with various UK pension funds. The reasons for the delays and lacking decisions of the funds were not communicated to the Office.

Since August 2019, newcomers have been informed of the possibility to request a transfer of pension rights from the UK (via their introduction session during onboarding). The possibility of UK transfer is also mentioned in the new Intranet, along with information regarding the other countries.

In view of allowing other colleagues to consolidate their pension rights, the Office is also exploring re-opening a transitional period of 6 months for staff whose appointment was confirmed between 2015 and August 2019.

I trust the above clarifies the matter.

Yours sincerely,

Jan Boulanger


Digitally signed by Signature Jan

Date: 2023.07.20

11:35:25 +02'00'

Well, having spent over a year scrutinising UK pensions, even on the phone for many hours, it just seems like more of the same. They'd do anything to prevent you taking out any of the money and in some cases you'll never even see the money. They use people's hard-earned money for gambling on the stock market, inflating valuations of companies (making worthless companies that cannot make a profit seem like giants, i.e. a total bubble).

Pay attention to this part: "From 2019 to date, the Office received fifteen new requests from staff members to transfer their pension rights from the UK. For completeness, the three previous cases of inward transfers from private pension funds were completed, while several others are pending with various UK pension funds. The reasons for the delays and lacking decisions of the funds were not communicated to the Office."

This is so typical. When I studied internal reports of pension funds I saw many allusions and references to "war in Ukraine" and "COVID-19". Be sure if that if they refuse to pay out they'll have all the "politically-correct" excuses ready. When you look beyond brochures and Web sites you start to understand just how rogue some of these 'outfits' are; they only exist to play or game the market with other people's money (in essence borrowing from the future). They reckon they can get away with it until some date in the distant future. And it's almost impossible to withdraw the money, even if you pay the taxes, as they have all sorts of escalation routines to prevent you doing so. They even call the "big bosses" just to ensure you do not or cannot withdraw anything. They try to tire people down, assuming that mental fatigue will keep the money in the "Ponzi pot".

Tue, 02 Jan 2024 15:24:00 -0600 text/html
Biden admin facing congressional probe for sending billions to solar company accused of scamming elderly

FIRST ON FOX: Republican leaders in the House and Senate are probing the Department of Energy (DOE) over its accurate $3 billion award to a solar energy company that has been accused of scamming vulnerable customers.

In a letter to DOE Loan Programs Office Director Jigar Shah, the Republicans — House Energy and Commerce Chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., and Senate Energy and Natural Resources Ranking Member John Barrasso, R-Wyo. — expressed concern about rewarding the Houston-based Sunnova Energy Corporation. They cited reports highlighting how Sunnova has previously scammed and misled consumers.

"We are alarmed about recent, credible reports that Sunnova has racked up numerous consumer complaints, including those alleging troubling sales practices, such as Sunnova pressing elderly homeowners in poor health to sign long-term contracts costing tens of thousands of dollars," they wrote to Shah. 

"These reports cite interviews with individuals who struggled to deal with large contracts that their elderly parents signed shortly before passing away as well as state consumer complaints alleging maintenance delays and predatory sales strategies," the letter continued.


House Energy and Commerce Chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., left, and Senate Energy and Natural Resources Ranking Member John Barrasso, R-Wyo., right, penned the letter to DOE Loan Programs Office Director Jigar Shah. (Getty Images)

In late September, the DOE Loan Programs Office announced that it had closed on a $3 billion partial loan certain to Sunnova's Project Hestia which will provide solar and battery storage to low-income individuals, as part of President Biden's sweeping green energy agenda. The agreement marked the federal government's largest commitment ever made to solar power.

The announcement stated that the project will provide loans for clean energy systems for approximately 75,000 to 115,000 homeowners throughout the U.S. and Puerto Rico.

But, while the reports cited in the letter by McMorris Rodgers and Barrasso focus on specific incidents, the Republican leaders wrote in their letter that those reports "are not isolated incidents."


Earlier this year, for example, the Better Business Bureau issued an alert for Sunnova and assigned it an "F rating" over its pattern of "deceptive sales practices," poor customer service and repair technicians not arriving on schedule. And consumers reported that their issues were only resolved by Sunnova after filing a complaint with the Better Business Bureau.

"To this date, despite countless phone calls, we still have not received service for that part almost 5 months later," one complaint filed in October with the Better Business Bureau states. "Our panels have not been working, therefore we are not receiving any benefit for them given that we are not receiving any credit with our electrical company due to them not working. We have tried over 100 times to call and work with the company to get them fixed."

Jigar Shah, director of the loan office at the Department of Energy, speaks during the 2023 CERAWeek by S&P Global conference in Houston on March 9. Shah is overseeing billions of dollars in green energy funds for projects nationwide. (Aaron M. Sprecher/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

"Our solar system (Sunova) [sic] has not been working properly for 4+ months," another October complaint states. "We have contacted Sunova [sic] multiple times with little to no action. Our contract states that Sunova [sic] will monitor our system and if there is an issue will fix in a timely manner. We have been fighting with this company for months to fix our system with no success. We have paid over a thousand dollars for electricity to national grid since our system isn’t working. Sunova [sic] is in breach of contract."


In 2019, Puerto Rico's Energy Bureau published a report, USA Today reported, that accused Sunnova of misleading consumers on the costs, contract length and potential savings from their services. The report went as far as to state that the company's "practices during the contracting process are not consistent with the obligations that power companies have."

Sunnova, which owns a majority of the residential market share in Puerto Rico, was hit with 436 complaints in the aftermath of Hurricane Maria, the report stated.

And the Washington Free Beacon reported last month that Sunnova has allegedly scammed vulnerable consumers including the elderly and sick. The report pointed to multiple examples of door-to-door Sunnova salesmen persuading such individuals to sign 25-year solar panel leases.

"It was truly ripping off old people," Terry Blythe, a Texas resident, told the outlet. "It was the biggest ripoff I've ever seen."

Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm hosts a Department of Energy news conference in December 2022. (REUTERS/Mary F. Calver/File Photo)

Blythe said her late father had been coerced into signing a 25-year solar panel lease in 2020 when he was 86 years old and suffering from dementia.

"All customers, regardless of age, are required to complete a thorough validation process where we confirm their identity and ensure that they have read and comprehended the terms of their agreements," a Sunnova spokesperson told the Washington Free Beacon, explaining that the company "cannot and [does] not decline to enter into an agreement based on a customer's age."

The spokesperson added Sunnova is "fully dedicated to assisting all our customers in resolving any issues that may arise during the life of their agreement or due to external factors."


Sunnova was founded in 2012 and ultimately went public seven years later in 2019. The company offers to install rooftop solar panels, mainly for residential customers, in exchange for a low-cost lease.

However, in accurate years, the company has lost hundreds of millions of dollars and its stock price has plummeted. In 2021, it lost $147.5 million; in 2022, it lost $130 million; and, since January 2021, its stock price has fallen more than 77%.

The DOE and Sunnova didn't respond to requests for comment.

Fri, 08 Dec 2023 01:26:00 -0600 Fox News en text/html
Biden Admin’s Iran ‘Fielded’-Weapon Walk-Back Leaves Unanswered Questions No result found, try new keyword!The administration, in statements since then, has walked back the remarks. But there are still unanswered questions, which are all the more important in light of reports that the U.S. is reviving ... Thu, 06 Apr 2023 07:32:00 -0500 en-US text/html Advantage Pro - Vectra Technosoft Pvt Ltd

Advertise Here





*Type the characters you see in the picture

Sign in to your SiliconIndia account

Don't have SiliconIndia account? Sign up     Forgot your password? Reset
IT Courses > Advantage Pro - Vectra Technosoft Pvt Ltd

Advantage Pro - Vectra Technosoft Pvt Ltd


Advantage Pro, the IT training division of Vectra Technosoft Pvt. Ltd., established in the year 1996. Advantage Pro is an upbeat global player in IT Training, redefining continuously the standard of training methodology and professional advancement. A fact to be cherished forever, it is probably the only institute in computer Hardware and Networking that has turned out more than 10,000 students functioning as a single center. Empowered by its versatile service offerings and globally certified expert faculty the company is keenly poised to become most preferred vender in Networking and Open Source Training segment. Today we are No.#1 in Red Hat Certification training, in the state of Tamil Nadu.

Strategic business alliance with key International market leaders like Red Hat, Pearson VUE, Prometric and Novell have enabled Advantage Pro to readily offer all leading global certification courses to its student and professional community through a single window.

The hallmark of various achievements includes our pride in the fact that one can find all most all our Alumni staff in all most all leading MNCs & IT organizations in the country today.

Courses Offered :

# MCSE Windows 2003 – 7 Papers
# Certified Novell Administrator (CNA)
# Suse Certified Linux Professional

Duration: 9 months
# Sun Solaris System Administration – Level 1
# Cisco Certified Network Associate
# Hardware & Networking Devices Maintenance
# Internet, Intranet & HTML
# 6 months of Professional Practice at a leading IT company with stipend

Courses offered

Hardware / Networking   Red Hat certifications: 
CISCO Certifications:  Microsoft Certifications: 
MCSE Windows   Certified Novell Administration CNA  
Sun Solaris   Linux 
Wed, 01 Aug 2018 10:47:00 -0500 text/html
SLHT administrator Caroline Taylor refuses to answer questions about 'deliberate cover-up' of £22m NHS Croydon overspend

SOUTH London Healthcare Trust’s new administrator Caroline Taylor was in charge of NHS Croydon when there was a deliberate cover-up of a £28m black hole in its budget, it has been revealed.

Ms Taylor has been appointed to oversee the trust as it prepares for dissolution later this year.

And once the SLHT - which runs Orpington Hospital, the Queen Elizabeth in Woolwich, Sidcup's Queen Mary's and the PRUH in Farnborough - is dissolved later this year, she will continue as an implementation director until 2016.

But she still has questions to answer about her time at Croydon Primary Care Trust.

Members of the South West London Joint Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee (JHOSC) are urging the Secretary of State for Health to compel her to answer crucial questions that remain unanswered about her time there.

They say the refusal of Ms Taylor, former finance director Stephen O’Brien and interim deputy director of finance Mark Phillips to supply evidence means they do not know the full extent of financial mismanagement at Croydon Primary Care Trust (PCT), despite a seven-month investigation.

The committee, formed by six south-west London councils to probe why the PCT reported a £5.54m surplus in its 2010/11 budget when it was actually £22.4m in debt, said there was "significant motivation for senior officers to disguise the extent of the financial incompetence at NHS Croydon to safeguard their own positions".

The report, published yesterday (April 29), also criticised the NHS for failing to hold individuals to account for the overspend and flatly contradicted the findings of a 2012 NHS-commissioned Ernst & Young report which lay the blame on a systems failure rather than staff.

JHOSC chairman Councillor Jason Cummings said: "What has become clear from the committee’s review is that the accounting errors were deliberately hidden.

“This was not the result of any system failure but a consequence of the action of individuals, who have still to explain their actions.

"We have been faced by a wall of silence from key witnesses in the NHS and subsequently there are still some questions that remain unanswered.

"In particular, we still don’t know why the accounts were altered and whether patients had been directly affected.

"This cannot be right, and we now call on the Department of Health to carry out rigorous investigation and ensure the relevant officers can be publicly held to account."

Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:19:00 -0500 en text/html
Online Evaluation FAQs

For Students

Where do I go to complete my evaluations?

Any of the following will work:

Can I complete my course evaluation using a mobile device? 

Yes.  Blue Evaluations is a web based solution and will work with smart phones and tablets.

Does it really matter if I complete these evaluations? 

Yes. Your feedback is vital to the university.  Results of evaluations are used by faculty to make changes in both the content and delivery of the course.  The evaluation results are also used to make personnel decisions and provide additional information for accreditation purposes.

Are all courses evaluated?

No.  While most courses are evaluated, for purposes of anonymity or for other reasons, some will not be. 

Will my instructor know if I completed the evaluation? 

No.  While instructors are able to view overall response rates, they can not identify individual student completion status. 

Are my responses confidential? 

Yes.  Faculty are provided summary reports only after grades have been submitted.  Summary reports DO NOT include any identifying student information.  Written comments are provided as submitted.

If the instructor does not know if I complete my evaluation, how am I able to receive reminders?

The course evaluation software automatically sends reminders to non-responders on a pre-defined schedule.  These reminders are 'personalized' using student names which are populated automatically by referencing the class list within Banner.  Faculty do not have access to the genuine course evaluation.

I am in a course with more than one instructor.  Do I have to complete an entire evaluation form for every instructor? 

No. The evaluation forms have course-specific questions and instructor-specific questions.  Students answer the course-specific questions once.  Students receive the instructor-specific questions for each instructor (instructor names will be included in the question).

I do not see an evaluation for one of my courses, what should I do?

Course evaluations are released at different times.  Please check your dashboard in as evaluations will appear as they are released.  Please contact your school's course eval administrator if you have any questions about the invitation(s) you have or have not received.

Are all the course evaluations released at the same time?

No. Each academic area determines the dates that the evaluations open and close.

Will I have time in class to complete the evaluation?

The instructor determines whether or not class time will be used to complete the evaluation. 

I receive an error when I attempt to login.  What do I do?

Students must use their W&M Username and password to access the course evaluations.  Make sure you are entering your W&M Username and password correctly.  Business students should also use their W&M Username instead of their Mason username.  If you continue to receive a message that your credentials are invalid, please contact the Technology Support Center at

When I try to access my evaluations, I receive an error indicating the 'tasks are not accessible'.  What's wrong?

This error message is typically displayed when an evaluation is no longer available for completion.  The evaluation may have already been completed or the evaluation window may already be closed.  Students receiving this message in error should contact their school's course eval administrator.

I thought I completed my evaluations.  Why am I still receiving reminders?

Reminders are sent to students with any incomplete evaluations.  Login to to confirm you have submitted all your evaluations.  To avoid email reminders - complete your course evaluations.

Who should I contact for support?

If you have trouble logging-in to the system, contact the Technology Support Center (TSC).  All other questions should be directed to the appropriate department/school/program eval administrator.


Contact the Technology Support Center (TSC)
757-221-4357 (HELP) | [[support]] | Monday - Friday, 8:00 am - 5:00 pm

Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:41:00 -0600 en text/html

050-730 helper | 050-730 plan | 050-730 techniques | 050-730 pdf | 050-730 outline | 050-730 Practice Test | 050-730 history | 050-730 study help | 050-730 testing | 050-730 test success |

Killexams test Simulator
Killexams Questions and Answers
Killexams Exams List
Search Exams
050-730 exam dump and training guide direct download
Training Exams List